On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 04:00:11 +, Toby Haynes
wrote:
> So glad to hear this is landing in the main branch, having run
> Hajime's code for at least a couple of years.
>
> Thanks to everyone involved in getting this landed.
Oh that's great ! I'll be happy to see it shipped
So glad to hear this is landing in the main branch, having run Hajime's
code for at least a couple of years.
Thanks to everyone involved in getting this landed.
Toby Haynes
On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 at 22:57 Hajime Fujita wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2017, at 7:46 PM, Tanu Kaskinen
On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 21:56 -0600, Hajime Fujita wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2017, at 7:46 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > And so ends this journey of several years... I pushed these patches to
> > the "next" branch now. Thank you all for your work and patience!
>
> Awesome! Thank you for
Hi Tanu and Anton,
> On Jan 10, 2017, at 5:57 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 22:34 +0100, Anton Lundin wrote:
>> On 06 November, 2016 - Hajime Fujita wrote:
>>
>>> This patch set adds a support for UDP version of RAOP (so called
>>> raop2). Most of the RAOP
On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 22:34 +0100, Anton Lundin wrote:
> On 06 November, 2016 - Hajime Fujita wrote:
>
> > This patch set adds a support for UDP version of RAOP (so called
> > raop2). Most of the RAOP devices (e.g. AppleTV, AirportExpress,
> > third party AV receivers) today use UDP version, so
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 22:34:29 +0100, Anton Lundin
wrote:
> I've tested and glanced at the raop-code and it ain't perfect but its
> way better than the current code for anything modern, so I'd suggest
> merging this.
Yay :) That's good news !
--
Colin
On 06 November, 2016 - Hajime Fujita wrote:
> This patch set adds a support for UDP version of RAOP (so called
> raop2). Most of the RAOP devices (e.g. AppleTV, AirportExpress,
> third party AV receivers) today use UDP version, so this patch
> set is expected to support those devices.
>
I've