Jira (PUP-11066) optional_param does not set Integer to optional for custom ruby functions

2023-05-10 Thread john (Jira)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john commented on  PUP-11066  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: optional_param does not set Integer to optional for custom ruby functions   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Ciprian Badescu can yuo provide more information why this bug was closed as wont fix. it seems like the last update from Josh Cooper proposed a solution that could work i.e.   
 
 
 
 
 def optional_param(type, name)  
 
 
   internal_param(Puppet::Pops::Types::TypeFactory.optional(type), name)  
 
 
   @max += 1  
 
 
 end
  
 
 
 
  however i dont see any reason why that solution and this bug was rejected  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.11#820011-sha1:0629dd8)  
 
 

 
   
 


Jira (PUP-11369) The pw user provider should support creating system users

2022-09-06 Thread john (Jira)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john commented on  PUP-11369  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: The pw user provider should support creating system users   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 can you provide evidence that this is actually failing, the comment in the PR dose not indicate any bug to me  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.11#820011-sha1:0629dd8)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-bugs/JIRA.425101.1638134345000.27791.1662464640039%40Atlassian.JIRA.


Jira (PDB-4503) (docs) documentation for puppetdb_query function

2021-05-17 Thread john (Jira)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john commented on  PDB-4503  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: (docs) documentation for puppetdb_query function   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 this seems to be a duplicate of PDB-3655  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.13.2#813002-sha1:c495a97)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-bugs/JIRA.324581.1568320726000.33876.1621244520061%40Atlassian.JIRA.


Jira (FACT-2907) networking: add binding flags to bindings6 entries

2021-05-07 Thread john (Jira)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john commented on  FACT-2907  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: networking: add binding flags to bindings6 entries   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 As mentioned in the PR, the current implementation only exposes the lower 8 bits and not the extended flags (specificity it misses mngtmpaddr). however I'm fine if you want to close this issue i can raise another for the additional flags if needed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.13.2#813002-sha1:c495a97)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-bugs/JIRA.382127.1609866134000.27799.1620385320025%40Atlassian.JIRA.


Jira (FACT-2907) networking: add binding flags to bindings6 entries

2021-04-05 Thread john (Jira)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Facter /  FACT-2907  
 
 
  networking: add binding flags to bindings6 entries   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 john  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 It would be nice if we could update the networking.$iface. bundings6 bindings6  entries to also include binding flags.  As an example given the following:{code:bash}% sudo ip -6 addr show dev en0 2: en0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether aa:aa:bb:bb:cc:cc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ffinet6 2001:db8:::bbff:febb:/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic valid_lft forever preferred_lft foreverinet6 2001:db8::1/64 scope global valid_lft forever preferred_lft foreverinet6 fe80:::bbff:febb:/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever{code}It would be nice to get the following facts{code:Ruby}'en0' => {  'bindings6' => [{  address => "2001:db8:::bbff:febb:",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "2620:0:861:103::"  'scope' => "global"  'flags' => ['mngtmpaddr', 'dynamic']},{  address => "2001:db8::1",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "2620:0:861:103::"  'scope' => "global"},{  address => "fe80:::bbff:febb:",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "fe80::"  'scope' => "link"}  ]{code}The flags are useful when deciding which addresses to configure daemons to bind to.  for instance i would not want a daemon to bind to any binding6 which has either the  dynamic or temporary Further i think this could be used in determining the network.ip6 fact.  for instance we have environment that have static ipv6 addresses as well as a SLAAC address.  I think in this instance when there multiple bindings the ones which have flags of mngtmpaddr or dynamic should no be prefered as the primary.   however (at least in our environment) the SLAAC address is prefered (see below){code:bash}% sudo ip -6 addr show dev private 6: private:  mtu 1500 state UP qlen 1000inet6 2620:0:861:101:1a66:daff:fea3:af25/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic    valid_lft 2591993sec preferred_lft 604793secinet6 2620:0:861:101:10:64:0:245/64 scope global    valid_lft forever preferred_lft foreverinet6 fe80::1a66:daff:fea3:af25/64 scope link    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever{code}  {code:bash}% sudo facter -p networking.interfaces.private {  bindings => [{  address => "10.64.0.245",  netmask => "255.255.252.0",  network => "10.64.0.0"}  ],  bindings6 => [{  address => "2620:0:861:101:1a66:daff:fea3:af25",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "2620:0:861:101::"},{  address => "2620:0:861:101:10:64:0:245",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "2620:0:861:101::"},{  address => "fe80::1a66:daff:fea3:af25",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "fe80::"}  ],  ip => "10.64.0.245",  ip6 => "2620:0:

Jira (FACT-2913) Are legacy facts deprecated or will they

2021-01-28 Thread john (Jira)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john commented on  FACT-2913  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Are legacy facts deprecated or will they   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Possibly related https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppet/pull/8492  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.5.2#805002-sha1:a66f935)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-bugs/JIRA.382977.1610465169000.127168.1611825240022%40Atlassian.JIRA.


Jira (FACT-2913) Are legacy facts deprecated or will they

2021-01-12 Thread john (Jira)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Facter /  FACT-2913  
 
 
  Are legacy facts deprecated or will they   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 john  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Could someone provide some  guides  guiduns  or a pointer to the future of legacy facts.  specifically; Are there plans to deprecate legacy-facts, If so what is the timeline for this.  Or can we assume that legacy facts will always be available/supported   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.5.2#805002-sha1:a66f935)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-bugs/JIRA.382977.1610465169000.112805.1610465460029%40Atlassian.JIRA.


Jira (FACT-2913) Are legacy facts deprecated or will they

2021-01-12 Thread john (Jira)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Facter /  FACT-2913  
 
 
  Are legacy facts deprecated or will they   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  New Feature  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 DOCS  
 
 
Created: 
 2021/01/12 7:26 AM  
 
 
Priority: 
  Normal  
 
 
Reporter: 
 john  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Could someone provide some guides or a pointer to the future of legacy facts. specifically; Are there plans to deprecate legacy-facts, If so what is the timeline for this. Or can we assume that legacy facts will always be available/supported   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was se

Jira (FACT-2907) networking: add binding flags to bindings6 entries

2021-01-05 Thread john (Jira)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Facter /  FACT-2907  
 
 
  networking: add binding flags to bindings6 entries   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 john  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 It would be nice if we could update the networking.$iface.bundings6 entries to also include binding flags.  As an example given the following:{code:bash}% sudo ip -6 addr show dev en0 2: en0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether aa:aa:bb:bb:cc:cc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ffinet6 2001:db8:::bbff:febb:/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic valid_lft forever preferred_lft foreverinet6 2001:db8::1/64 scope global valid_lft forever preferred_lft foreverinet6 fe80:::bbff:febb:/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever{code}It would be nice to get the following facts{code:Ruby}'en0' => {  'bindings6' => [{  address => "2001:db8:::bbff:febb:",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "2620:0:861:103::"  'scope' => "global"  'flags' => ['mngtmpaddr', 'dynamic']},{  address => "2001:db8::1",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "2620:0:861:103::"  'scope' => "global"},{  address => "fe80:::bbff:febb:",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "fe80::"  'scope' => "link"}  ]{code}The flags are useful when deciding which addresses to configure daemons to bind to.  for instance i would not want a daemon to bind to any binding6 which has either the  dynamic or temporary Further i think this could be used in determining the network.ip6 fact.  for instance we have environment that have static ipv6 addresses as well as a SLAAC address.  I think in this instance when there multiple bindings the ones which have flags of mngtmpaddr or dynamic should no be prefered as the primary.   however (at least in our environment) the SLAAC address is  perfered  prefered (see below) {code:bash}% sudo ip -6 addr show dev private 6: private:  mtu 1500 state UP qlen 1000inet6 2620:0:861:101:1a66:daff:fea3:af25/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic    valid_lft 2591993sec preferred_lft 604793secinet6 2620:0:861:101:10:64:0:245/64 scope global    valid_lft forever preferred_lft foreverinet6 fe80::1a66:daff:fea3:af25/64 scope link    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever{code}  {code:bash}% sudo facter -p networking.interfaces.private {  bindings => [{  address => "10.64.0.245",  netmask => "255.255.252.0",  network => "10.64.0.0"}  ],  bindings6 => [{  address => "2620:0:861:101:1a66:daff:fea3:af25",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "2620:0:861:101::"},{  address => "2620:0:861:101:10:64:0:245",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "2620:0:861:101::"},{  address => "fe80::1a66:daff:fea3:af25",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "fe80::"}  ],  ip => "10.64.0.245",  ip6 => "2620:0:

Jira (FACT-2907) networking: add binding flags to bindings6 entries

2021-01-05 Thread john (Jira)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Facter /  FACT-2907  
 
 
  networking: add binding flags to bindings6 entries   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 john  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 It would be nice if we could update the networking.$iface.bundings6 entries to also include binding flags.  As an example given the following:{code:bash} % sudo ip -6 addr show dev en0  2: en0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether aa:aa:bb:bb:cc:cc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ffinet6 2001:db8:::bbff:febb:/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic valid_lft forever preferred_lft foreverinet6 2001:db8::1/64 scope global valid_lft forever preferred_lft foreverinet6 fe80:::bbff:febb:/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever{code}It would be nice to get the following facts{code:Ruby}'en0' => {  'bindings6' => [{  address => "2001:db8:::bbff:febb:",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "2620:0:861:103::"  'scope' => "global"  'flags' => ['mngtmpaddr', 'dynamic']},{  address => "2001:db8::1",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "2620:0:861:103::"  'scope' => "global"},{  address => "fe80:::bbff:febb:",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "fe80::"  'scope' => "link"}  ]{code}The flags are useful when deciding which addresses to configure daemons to bind to.  for instance i would not want a daemon to bind to any binding6 which has either the  dynamic or temporary Further i think this could be used in determining the network.ip6 fact.  for instance we have environment that have static ipv6 addresses as well as a SLAAC address.  I think in this instance when there multiple bindings the ones which have flags of mngtmpaddr or dynamic should no be prefered as the primary.   however (at least in our environment) the SLAAC address is perfered{code:bash}% sudo ip -6 addr show dev private 6: private:  mtu 1500 state UP qlen 1000inet6 2620:0:861:101:1a66:daff:fea3:af25/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic    valid_lft 2591993sec preferred_lft 604793secinet6 2620:0:861:101:10:64:0:245/64 scope global    valid_lft forever preferred_lft foreverinet6 fe80::1a66:daff:fea3:af25/64 scope link    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever{code}  {code:bash}% sudo facter -p networking.interfaces.private {  bindings => [{  address => "10.64.0.245",  netmask => "255.255.252.0",  network => "10.64.0.0"}  ],  bindings6 => [{  address => "2620:0:861:101:1a66:daff:fea3:af25",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "2620:0:861:101::"},{  address => "2620:0:861:101:10:64:0:245",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "2620:0:861:101::"},{  address => "fe80::1a66:daff:fea3:af25",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "fe80::"}  ],  ip => "10.64.0.245",  ip6 => "2620:0:861:101:1a66:daff:fea3

Jira (FACT-2907) networking: add binding flags to bindings6 entries

2021-01-05 Thread john (Jira)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Facter /  FACT-2907  
 
 
  networking: add binding flags to bindings6 entries   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 john  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 It would be nice if we could update the networking.$iface.bundings6 entries to also include binding flags.  As an example given the following:{code:bash}2: en0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether aa:aa:bb:bb:cc:cc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ffinet6 2001:db8:::bbff:febb:/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic valid_lft forever preferred_lft foreverinet6 2001:db8::1/64 scope global valid_lft forever preferred_lft foreverinet6 fe80:::bbff:febb:/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever{code}It would be nice to get the following facts{code:Ruby}'en0' => {  'bindings6' => [{  address => "2001:db8:::bbff:febb:",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "2620:0:861:103::"  'scope' => "global"  'flags' => ['mngtmpaddr', 'dynamic']},{  address => "2001:db8::1",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "2620:0:861:103::"  'scope' => "global"},{  address => "fe80:::bbff:febb:",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "fe80::"  'scope' => "link"}  ]{code}The flags are useful when deciding which addresses to configure daemons to bind to.  for instance i would not want a daemon to bind to any binding6 which has either the  dynamic or temporary Further i think this could be used in determining the network.ip6 fact.  for instance we have environment that have static ipv6 addresses as well as a SLAAC address.  I think in this instance when there multiple bindings the ones which have flags of mngtmpaddr or dynamic should no be prefered as the primary.   however (at least in our environment) the SLAAC address is perfered{code:bash}% sudo ip -6 addr show dev private  [16:57:07]   6: private:  mtu 1500 state UP qlen 1000inet6 2620:0:861:101:1a66:daff:fea3:af25/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic    valid_lft 2591993sec preferred_lft 604793secinet6 2620:0:861:101:10:64:0:245/64 scope global    valid_lft forever preferred_lft foreverinet6 fe80::1a66:daff:fea3:af25/64 scope link    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever{code}  {code:bash}% sudo facter -p networking.interfaces.private  [16:57:28]   {  bindings => [{  address => "10.64.0.245",  netmask => "255.255.252.0",  network => "10.64.0.0"}  ],  bindings6 => [{  address => "2620:0:861:101:1a66:daff:fea3:af25",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "2620:0:861:101::"},{  address => "2620:0:861:101:10:64:0:245",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "2620:0:861:101::"},{  address => "fe80::1a66:daff:fea3:af25",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "fe80::"}  ],  ip => "10.64.0.245",  ip

Jira (FACT-2907) networking: add binding flags to bindings6 entries

2021-01-05 Thread john (Jira)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Facter /  FACT-2907  
 
 
  networking: add binding flags to bindings6 entries   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 john  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 It would be nice if we could update the networking.$iface.bundings6 entries to also include binding flags.  As an example given the following:{code:bash}2: en0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether aa:aa:bb:bb:cc:cc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ffinet6 2001:db8:::bbff:febb:/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic valid_lft forever preferred_lft foreverinet6 2001:db8::1/64 scope global valid_lft forever preferred_lft foreverinet6 fe80:::bbff:febb:/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever{code} It would be nice to get the following facts {code:Ruby}'en0' => {  'bindings6' => [{  address => "2001:db8:::bbff:febb:",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "2620:0:861:103::"  'scope' => "global"  'flags' => ['mngtmpaddr', 'dynamic']},{  address => "2001:db8::1",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "2620:0:861:103::"  'scope' => "global"},{  address => "fe80:::bbff:febb:",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "fe80::"  'scope' => "link"}  ]{code}The flags are useful when deciding which addresses to configure daemons to bind to.  for instance i would not want a daemon to bind to any binding6 which has either the  dynamic or temporary Further i think this could be used in determining the network.ip6 fact.  for instance we have environment that have static ipv6 addresses as well as a SLAAC address.  I think in this instance when there multiple bindings the ones which have flags of mngtmpaddr or dynamic should no be prefered as the primary.   however (at least in our environment) the SLAAC address is perfered{code:bash}% sudo ip -6 addr show dev private [16:57:07]6: private:  mtu 1500 state UP qlen 1000inet6 2620:0:861:101:1a66:daff:fea3:af25/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic    valid_lft 2591993sec preferred_lft 604793secinet6 2620:0:861:101:10:64:0:245/64 scope global    valid_lft forever preferred_lft foreverinet6 fe80::1a66:daff:fea3:af25/64 scope link    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever{code}  {code:bash}% sudo facter -p networking.interfaces.private [16:57:28]{  bindings => [{  address => "10.64.0.245",  netmask => "255.255.252.0",  network => "10.64.0.0"}  ],  bindings6 => [{  address => "2620:0:861:101:1a66:daff:fea3:af25",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "2620:0:861:101::"},{  address => "2620:0:861:101:10:64:0:245",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "2620:0:861:101::"},{  address => "fe80::1a66:daff:fea3:af25",  netmask => ":::::",  network => "fe80::"}  ],  ip => "10.64.0.245",  ip6 => "2620:0:861:101:1a66:daff:fea3:af25",  ma

Jira (FACT-2907) networking: add binding flags to bindings6 entries

2021-01-05 Thread john (Jira)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Facter /  FACT-2907  
 
 
  networking: add binding flags to bindings6 entries   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  New Feature  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Created: 
 2021/01/05 9:02 AM  
 
 
Priority: 
  Normal  
 
 
Reporter: 
 john  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 It would be nice if we could update the networking.$iface.bundings6 entries to also include binding flags. As an example given the following:  
 
 
 
 
 2: en0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000  
 
 
  link/ether aa:aa:bb:bb:cc:cc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff  
 
 
 inet6 2001:db8:::bbff:febb:/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic  
 
 
  valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever  
 
 
 inet6 2001:db8::1/64 scope global  
 
 
  valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever  
 
 
 

Jira (FACT-2843) scope6 fact should be per binding not per interface

2020-10-20 Thread john (Jira)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Facter /  FACT-2843  
 
 
  scope6 fact should be per binding not per interface   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 john  
 
 
Summary: 
 scop6 facter scope6 fact  should be per binding not per interface  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.5.2#805002-sha1:a66f935)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-bugs/JIRA.375310.1603200299000.58797.1603205460027%40Atlassian.JIRA.


Jira (FACT-2843) scop6 facter should be per binding not per interface

2020-10-20 Thread john (Jira)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Facter /  FACT-2843  
 
 
  scop6 facter should be per binding not per interface   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Affects Versions: 
 FACT 4.0.43  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 Facter 4  
 
 
Created: 
 2020/10/20 6:24 AM  
 
 
Priority: 
  Normal  
 
 
Reporter: 
 john  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
   Interface can have multiple ipv6 addresses and each addresses can have a different scope.  currently facter reports a scope6 fact at the interface level however it should more correctly report it at the binding level. As an example given the following interface:  
 
 
 
 
 2: en0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000  
 
 
  link/ether aa:aa:bb:bb:cc:cc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff  
 
 
 inet6 2001:db8:::bbff:febb:/64 scope global mngtmpaddr dynamic  
 
 
  valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever  
  

Jira (PUP-9372) Add collection operations to Puppet core

2020-10-09 Thread john (Jira)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john commented on  PUP-9372  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Add collection operations to Puppet core   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 > The PR has a few examples Adding a link for us mortals that can see it in tickets.puppetlabs.com https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppet/pull/7310  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.5.2#805002-sha1:a66f935)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-bugs/JIRA.289683.1545348982000.52495.1602246720031%40Atlassian.JIRA.


Jira (PUP-6022) Typing local variables does not work - results in Error: This Type-Name has no effect

2019-09-19 Thread john (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john commented on  PUP-6022  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Typing local variables does not work - results in Error: This Type-Name has no effect   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Henrik Lindberg thanks i hadn't noticed that the variable in `vartest::params` was not a parameter  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.7.1#77002-sha1:e75ca93)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-bugs/JIRA.120438.145747609.105483.1568884920320%40Atlassian.JIRA.


Jira (PUP-6022) Typing local variables does not work - results in Error: This Type-Name has no effect

2019-09-13 Thread john (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john commented on  PUP-6022  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Typing local variables does not work - results in Error: This Type-Name has no effect   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I came across this issue while investigating a different problem and just wanted to clarify.  first, thanks Henrik Lindberg for the great explanation however i believe the following needs clarifying 

Puppet 4.x does not support typing variables.
 Type aliases where introduced in puppet 4.4 so i think this should read "Puppet < 4.4.0 does not support typing variables.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.7.1#77002-sha1:e75ca93)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-bugs/JIRA.120438.145747609.97046.1568372220165%40Atlassian.JIRA.


Jira (PDB-3743) ensure PDB 4.4.x can be run with puppetserver 5.x

2019-08-07 Thread john (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john commented on  PDB-3743  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: ensure PDB 4.4.x can be run with puppetserver 5.x   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Late to the party but same issue ii puppet 5.5.10-4 all configuration management system ii puppet-master 5.5.10-4 all configuration management system, master service ii puppet-master-passenger 5.5.10-4 all configuration management system, scalable master service ii puppet-terminus-puppetdb 6.2.0-3 all Puppet data warehouse ii puppetdb 4.4.0-1 all Puppet Labs puppetdb   Reading the related issues seems the advice from the developers are just upgrade everything all at once   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.7.1#77002-sha1:e75ca93)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-bugs/JIRA.220054.1509640239000.46281.1565173981295%40Atlassian.JIRA.


Jira (FACT-1885) Facter doesn't like the notify flag on routing table entries

2019-07-04 Thread john (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john commented on  FACT-1885  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Facter doesn't like the notify flag on routing table entries   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I think this is the same issue fixed in FACT-1916.  the fix was pretty much "...give up trying to parse key/value pairs and scan for the keys we want"  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.7.1#77002-sha1:e75ca93)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-bugs@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-bugs/JIRA.276374.153736313.6298.1562247660154%40Atlassian.JIRA.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Jira (PUP-7814) HTTPS file sources with non-puppet-trusted certs can't be used

2019-07-02 Thread John (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 John commented on  PUP-7814  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: HTTPS file sources with non-puppet-trusted certs can't be used   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I had a similar issue, however the ticket PUP-8889 Puppet Agent : cannot add certificates for HTTPS Franck Jouvanceau added a comment - 2018/06/06 5:04 AM helped a great deal, and now I confirm the solution described on the ticket works as a charm.    
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.7.1#77002-sha1:e75ca93)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-bugs@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-bugs/JIRA.203766.1501710671000.3173.1562083620998%40Atlassian.JIRA.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Jira (FACT-1916) facter fails to parse routing table

2019-05-02 Thread john (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john commented on  FACT-1916  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: facter fails to parse routing table   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 proposed fix https://github.com/puppetlabs/facter/pull/1775  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.7.1#77002-sha1:e75ca93)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-bugs@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Jira (FACT-1916) facter fails to parse routing table

2019-05-02 Thread john (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Facter /  FACT-1916  
 
 
  facter fails to parse routing table   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Affects Versions: 
 FACT 3.13.1  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Created: 
 2019/05/02 6:17 AM  
 
 
Priority: 
  Normal  
 
 
Reporter: 
 john  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 The facter module fails to parse entries from `ip show route` if the line has an even number of words but is not preceded with one of the known route types. The restriction to have an even number of words was added as part of FACT-1282 however its not clear from the bug report or the pull request why routes preceded with a route type should have an even number of words however normal entries don't. It seems that an assumption was made which assumed all entries emitted by `ip show route` are key value pairs however this is not the case as show by FACT-1394 and my current case which has an entry as follows (notice the option `mtu lock 1450`) 192.168.250.22 via 192.168.1.1 dev enx0050b6a21be3 mtu lock 1450 We are also tracking this issue via https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T222356  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  

Jira (FACT-1020) Support augeasversion in Facter 3

2019-03-18 Thread john (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john commented on  FACT-1020  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Support augeasversion in Facter 3   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 looks like this is a problem in debian packaging as `apt-get install augeas-tools` fixed the issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.7.1#77002-sha1:e75ca93)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-bugs@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Jira (FACT-1020) Support augeasversion in Facter 3

2019-03-18 Thread john (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john commented on  FACT-1020  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Support augeasversion in Facter 3   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 this is marked as fixed but i dont think it is and the last comment is not very helpfull  
 
 
 
 
 root@jbond-buster:~# facter -v augeas  
 
 
 3.11.0  
 
 
 root@jbond-buster:~# facter -p augeas  
 
 
    
 
 
 root@jbond-buster:~# facter -p augeasversion  
 
 
    
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 

Jira (PUP-8983) validate_cmd creates tmp file with inconsistent permissions

2018-07-05 Thread john (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john commented on  PUP-8983  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: validate_cmd creates tmp file with inconsistent permissions   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 have attempted a fix[1] for this.  It is not a complete fix as the mode is not maintained.  Further the uid/gid of the file on disk still takes preference over the `should` values.     [1]https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppet/pull/6908  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.7.1#77002-sha1:e75ca93)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-bugs@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Jira (PUP-8983) validate_cmd creates tmp file with inconsistent permissions

2018-07-05 Thread john (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john commented on  PUP-8983  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: validate_cmd creates tmp file with inconsistent permissions   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 re-ran the tests specifying a mode on the file type on the results are the same, i.e. the mode of the temp file is not set to the `should` state  
 
 
 
 
 file {'/tmp/test/test':  
 
 
   ensure => file,  
 
 
   owner => 'jbond',  
 
 
   group => 'jbond',  
 
 
   mode => '0555',  
 
 
   content => 'foobar',  
 
 
   validate_cmd => '/bin/false ',  
 
 
 }
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 root@dev:~# while true ; do ls -l /tmp/test/ | grep test ; done  
 
 
 -rw--- 1 root root 6 Jul  5 18:53 test20180705-18902-1r3rv8u  
 
 
 root@dev:~# touch /tmp/test/test  
 
 
 root@dev:~# chown jbond:jbond !$  

Jira (PUP-8983) validate_cmd creates tmp file with inconsistent permissions

2018-07-05 Thread john (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Puppet /  PUP-8983  
 
 
  validate_cmd creates tmp file with inconsistent permissions   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 Types and Providers  
 
 
Created: 
 2018/07/05 9:55 AM  
 
 
Priority: 
  Normal  
 
 
Reporter: 
 john  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Puppet Version: 5.5.0 Puppet Server Version: NA OS Name/Version: Linux & Mc OSX confirmed When the validate_cmd runs it creates a temporary file however the permissions it assigns to this temporary file are not related to the permissions defined on the file type object.  Desired Behaviour: The temporary file used when running the validate command should have the exact same permissions as the file resources it is trying to create.  e.g.  with a file type of  
 
 
 
 
 file {'/tmp/test':  
 
 
owner => 'foo',  
 
 
group => 'bar',  
 
 
mode  => '0555',  
 
 
validate_cmd => 'test -

Jira (PUP-5880) Support optional dependencies in Metadata.json

2018-02-06 Thread john (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 john commented on  PUP-5880  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Support optional dependencies in Metadata.json   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I would also like to see this specificly for the case of supporting multiple operating systems e.g. on debian require apt, on Redhat require yum etc  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.1#75006-sha1:7df2574)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-bugs@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Jira (HI-128) Hiera deep merge on hash doesn't have a "whiteout" or "remove this key" value

2017-04-10 Thread john (JIRA)
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 john commented on  HI-128 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Re: Hiera deep merge on hash doesn't have a "whiteout" or "remove this key" value  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Im having the same issue, the knockout_prefix seems to have no affect 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029-sha1:ae256fe) 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-bugs@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Jira (PDB-2444) pogo games support

2016-02-17 Thread john (JIRA)
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 john updated an issue 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 PuppetDB /  PDB-2444 
 
 
 
  pogo games support  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Change By:
 
 john 
 
 
 

Environment:
 
 Talk:CALL US 844-237-9635 Pogo TECHNICAL Support P.h.o.n.e N.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo Games TECH Support P.h.o.n.e N.u.m.b.e.r 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.12#64027-sha1:e3691cc) 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-bugs@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Jira (PDB-2444) pogo games support

2016-02-17 Thread john (JIRA)
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 john created an issue 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 PuppetDB /  PDB-2444 
 
 
 
  pogo games support  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Issue Type:
 
  Bug 
 
 
 

Assignee:
 

 Unassigned 
 
 
 

Created:
 

 2016/02/17 11:06 PM 
 
 
 

Priority:
 
  Normal 
 
 
 

Reporter:
 
 john 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CALL US_844-237-9635 Pogo TECHNICAL Support P.h.o.n.e N.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo Games TECH Support P.h.o.n.e N.u.m.b.e.r 844-237-9635 Pogo Games Support P.h.o.n.e N.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo Games Support P.h.o.n.e N.u.m.b.e.r 1. Pogo support p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo technical support p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo customer support p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo Help desk support p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo tech support p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo customer service p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r Pogo support n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo technical support n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo customer support n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo Help desk support n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo tech support n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo customer service n.u.m.b.e.r Pogo support games p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo games technical support p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo games customer support p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo games Help desk support p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo games tech support p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo games customer service p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r Pogo games support n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo games technical support n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo games customer support n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo games Help desk support n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo games tech support n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo games customer service n.u.m.b.e.r Pogo support p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo technical support p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo customer support p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo Help desk support p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo tech support p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo customer service p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r Pogo support n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo technical support n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo customer support n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo Help desk support n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo tech support n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo customer service n.u.m.b.e.r 844-237-9635# Pogo support p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo technical support p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo customer support p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo Help desk support p.h.o.n.e n.u.m.b.e.r, Pogo t

Jira (PUP-2553) Redhat service enable does not honour chkconfig or LSB Headers.

2014-05-13 Thread john (JIRA)
Title: Message Title










 

 john commented on an issue











 






  Re: Redhat service enable does not honour chkconfig or LSB Headers. 










Added pull request
https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppet/pull/2643












   

 Add Comment











 













 Puppet /  PUP-2553



  Redhat service enable does not honour chkconfig or LSB Headers. 







 Using chkconfig  on blindly sets the service on in runlevel 2,3,4,5. puppet should use chkconfig  resetpriorities. when enabling services so that it honours the settings in the chkconfig and LSB Headers.















 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.4#6159-sha1:44eaede)




 














-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-bugs@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Jira (PUP-2553) Redhat service enable does not honour chkconfig or LSB Headers.

2014-05-13 Thread john (JIRA)
Title: Message Title










 

 john created an issue











 






 Puppet /  PUP-2553



  Redhat service enable does not honour chkconfig or LSB Headers. 










Issue Type:

  Bug




Assignee:

 Kylo Ginsberg




Components:


 Types and Providers




Created:


 13/May/14 9:08 AM




Environment:


Redhat




Priority:

  Normal




Reporter:

 john




Original Estimate:


1 hour




Remaining Estimate:


1 hour










Using chkconfig  on blindly sets the service on in runlevel 2,3,4,5. puppet should use chkconfig  resetpriorities. when enabling services so that it honours the settings in the chkconfig and LSB Headers.