Hi All!
So, Beaker is awesome. But there are some features that are nice-to-haves
that aren't needed for Puppetlabs themselves:
https://github.com/puppetlabs/beaker/issues/512
https://github.com/puppetlabs/beaker/issues/499
So, I thought about having these as extensions in a separate gem, that
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Trevor Vaughan tvaug...@onyxpoint.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I've got a couple of issues running rspec-puppet tests under Ruby 2 that I
was hoping someone could shed some light on.
First, under Ruby 2, any validation functions in the code appear to be
getting
I think this is a good idea. It is a bit concerning that Alice doesn't
think there is a good way to add extensions to beaker right now, maybe
development time at #puppethack could be spent shoring that up. I'm +1
on this and would add my limited experience to the maintainer hat pool.
--
Spencer
I have to +1 this as well. I think it is hugely important to work out an
extension mechanism if only so that we can eventually break up the codebase and
have them managed separately.
I am pretty familiar with the code at this point so I am happy to get involved,
either directly on the current
How bizarre. This does seem like a bit of a show stopper to me in terms of
testing in multiple environments.
Hopefully, we can figure it out at some point.
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Dan Bode bod...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Trevor Vaughan
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Dan Bode bod...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Trevor Vaughan tvaug...@onyxpoint.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I've got a couple of issues running rspec-puppet tests under Ruby 2 that
I was hoping someone could shed some light on.
First, under
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Kylo Ginsberg k...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Dan Bode bod...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Trevor Vaughan tvaug...@onyxpoint.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I've got a couple of issues running rspec-puppet tests under
