On 4 November 2010 04:20, James Turnbull ja...@lovedthanlost.net wrote:
From: John E. Vincent lusis.org+github@gmail.com
We need testing on 1.8.1 upwards. Do we not want json/pure rather than json?
Signed-off-by: James Turnbull ja...@lovedthanlost.net
---
bin/facter |
We need testing on 1.8.1 upwards. Do we not want json/pure rather than json?
i.e. PSON?
-- Markus
---
When in trouble or in doubt, run in circles,
scream and shout. -- 1920's parody of the
maritime general prudential rule
On 4 November 2010 16:52, Markus Roberts mar...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
We need testing on 1.8.1 upwards. Do we not want json/pure rather than
json?
i.e. PSON?
I really don't want to have to do embed that in facter.
Paul
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
We need testing on 1.8.1 upwards. Do we not want json/pure rather than
json?
i.e. PSON?
I really don't want to have to do embed that in facter.
P --
Aw. But if you just embed everything in everything else all the version
compatibility problems just magically vanish! :)
-- M
From: John E. Vincent lusis.org+github@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: James Turnbull ja...@lovedthanlost.net
---
bin/facter|5 -
lib/facter/application.rb | 13 +
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bin/facter b/bin/facter
index
