Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: Puppet 4 delivery and upgrades

2014-12-07 Thread Justin Lambert
I was also curious where (and if there was a guess when) to look for nightly builds so I can start testing the decisions made. Thanks, jl > On Dec 7, 2014, at 16:33, Trevor Vaughan wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'm curious as to what decisions (if any) have been made here. > > Thanks, > > Trevor

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: Puppet 4 delivery and upgrades

2014-12-07 Thread Trevor Vaughan
Hi All, I'm curious as to what decisions (if any) have been made here. Thanks, Trevor On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Trevor Vaughan wrote: > I'm in 100% agreement with John here. > > Right now, I have a forked Hiera that I'm using based off of some patches > that I have PRs in for. Once th

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: Puppet 4 delivery and upgrades

2014-11-24 Thread Trevor Vaughan
I'm in 100% agreement with John here. Right now, I have a forked Hiera that I'm using based off of some patches that I have PRs in for. Once this gets resolved, I'll merge everything back to the mainline, but I *must* have the ability to deviate when necessary for the best results of my users. As

[Puppet-dev] Re: Puppet 4 delivery and upgrades

2014-11-24 Thread John Bollinger
On Friday, November 21, 2014 2:47:05 PM UTC-6, Eric Sorenson wrote: > 5 - Why not use a metapackage which has no content of its own, but has > requirements on specific versions of the other 'real' packages that contain > the actual programs? > • Avoiding a coordinated major version

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: Puppet 4 delivery and upgrades

2014-11-22 Thread Daniel De Marco
* Eric Sorenson [11/21/2014 21:47]: > Commercial OS'es (Windows excepted) will get PE-only AIO > Mac OS X will there be a FOSS puppet 4 for OSX ? It will still be available as a gem or as a single package, right? Thanks, Daniel. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: Puppet 4 delivery and upgrades

2014-11-21 Thread Rob Reynolds
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Nan Liu wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Eric Sorenson < > eric.soren...@puppetlabs.com> wrote: > >> >> On Nov 18, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Eric Sorenson >> wrote: >> >> > 7. Umm.. I think that's all. >> >> Wow thanks for all the responses, there are a ton of

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: Puppet 4 delivery and upgrades

2014-11-21 Thread Nan Liu
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Eric Sorenson < eric.soren...@puppetlabs.com> wrote: > > On Nov 18, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Eric Sorenson > wrote: > > > 7. Umm.. I think that's all. > > Wow thanks for all the responses, there are a ton of very good questions > in here -- some of them got answered in

[Puppet-dev] Re: Puppet 4 delivery and upgrades

2014-11-21 Thread Eric Sorenson
On Nov 18, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Eric Sorenson wrote: > 7. Umm.. I think that's all. Wow thanks for all the responses, there are a ton of very good questions in here -- some of them got answered inline and I think we rolled up the rest into this little FAQ. which I''m sure will generate a new s

[Puppet-dev] Re: Puppet 4 delivery and upgrades

2014-11-20 Thread Corey Osman
I can only imagine how much time has been lost over the years trying to support ruby 1.8.7. I think this is a great move as long as we can still install puppet using gems under a newer ruby. Will the ffi gem be part of the AIO package? I won't even bother creating a ticket for a bug I just