Hi Brice,
Brice Figureau wrote:
Or I could change puppetdoc rdoc to take more arguments like
--modulepath /path/to/modules along with the path where to find the
global (or site) manifests. If --modulepath is not mentionned then we
assume that analysed path contains only modules.
+1
It
On Nov 4, 2008, at 2:24 AM, Brice Figureau wrote:
My concern is that puppetdoc right now doesn't use puppet.conf at all,
and I'd like to keep this behavior. I want to be able to generate docs
for a pile of manifests, modules or not. If I tie puppetdoc rdoc
generation to puppet.conf
On Nov 4, 2008, at 9:28 AM, Brice Figureau wrote:
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 09:05 -0600, Luke Kanies wrote:
I'd do that. Just generate docs for what people specify.
I'd also probably have puppetdoc accept standard ARGV arguments, and
consider those to be normal manifests, which it could
On Nov 4, 2008, at 10:54 AM, Brice Figureau wrote:
Right, of course :-)
My problem is:
Let's say I have:
/etc/puppet/modules/module1
/etc/puppet/modules/module2
and some global manifests
/etc/puppet/manifests/site.pp
...
and some other global manifests
/tmp/manifests/site.pp
If
Brice Figureau schrieb:
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 10:04 -0600, Luke Kanies wrote:
On Nov 4, 2008, at 9:28 AM, Brice Figureau wrote:
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 09:05 -0600, Luke Kanies wrote:
I'd do that. Just generate docs for what people specify.
I'd also probably have puppetdoc accept standard
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 18:13 +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
Brice Figureau schrieb:
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 10:04 -0600, Luke Kanies wrote:
On Nov 4, 2008, at 9:28 AM, Brice Figureau wrote:
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 09:05 -0600, Luke Kanies wrote:
I'd do that. Just generate docs for what
Hi Florian
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 04:04:01 -0800 (PST)
jerico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Lorenz,
I've commented on that before but i might revise my statement. I use
classes almost exclusively for grouping together defines and
therefore i'm not very concerned about class-level
On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:28 AM, Gunnar Wrobel wrote:
So taking that fact into account means one should refrain from using
puppet for more complex administration work?
I certainly hope not. There will always be problems that any given
tool can't handle well, and there are certainly classes of
On Oct 25, 2008, at 6:16 AM, Lorenz Schori wrote:
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:48:17 -0500
Luke Kanies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, first i want to say that i'm very happy with puppet and the way it
works. The require-thing is just one little annoyance which really
bugged me long enough that i
On Oct 30, 2008, at 5:22 AM, Lorenz Schori wrote:
Hell Again,
Well, after reading a big part of the puppet source, the rspec tests
and the wiki i'm still convinced that the puppet dependency handling
can be enhanced by implementing my original proposal. I now found a
way
to provide
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 10:04 -0600, Luke Kanies wrote:
On Nov 4, 2008, at 9:28 AM, Brice Figureau wrote:
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 09:05 -0600, Luke Kanies wrote:
I'd do that. Just generate docs for what people specify.
I'd also probably have puppetdoc accept standard ARGV arguments,
On Oct 31, 2008, at 10:33 AM, jerico wrote:
If you're interested in a more abstract discussion of my ideal
definition language for a configuration tool, then you may read on. I
think I gave answers to all of your more specific questions here.
I definitely am. I'm going to trim as much as
Hi all,
These problems keep cropping up, and it seems like we need a more
comprehensive solution.
The current 'master' branch has permission problems in puppetmasterd
(as implied), and it's basically a race condition that shows up again
and again.
The server needs to do these things:
-
parenthetical comment injected in the middle of possible ensure values was
masked the 3rd and 4th value.
will not delete directories isn't true if you add 'recurse = true'
---
lib/puppet/type/file/ensure.rb |9 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git
Great - +1.
On Nov 4, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Tim Harper wrote:
parenthetical comment injected in the middle of possible ensure
values was masked the 3rd and 4th value.
will not delete directories isn't true if you add 'recurse = true'
---
lib/puppet/type/file/ensure.rb |9 -
1
On Nov 4, 2008, at 3:42 PM, Florian Grandel wrote:
Hi Luke,
In other words, I think the low-cost approach (fixing current stuff)
is not the right idea here, and a higher-cost approach (where cost is
mostly design) is the right solution.
That's ok for me.
This would obviously be
(I'm kind of rate-limiting my response to this thread; it's long
enough that it could take over my life if I let it.)
On Oct 31, 2008, at 10:33 AM, jerico wrote:
[...]
The goal of a definition is to function as a composite resource,
allowing multiple Puppet resources to look like a single
I am running RedHat Enterprise 4.5 x86_64bit, and i have been having
some major problems getting
ruby-shadow working. As RHEL4 comes with Ruby 1.8.1 which is not
officially supported by Puppet,
I have tried for several days everything I can think of to get it to
work, but have failed every time.
Hi Luke,
oups, I saw now that whenever you reply to a mail with the previous
subject, then the discussion subject changes. That was not my intent...
I'll change it back to your new subject with this post.
You didn't like the term resource-bundle. I think class is a good
candidate for future
Hi Luke,
What I'm saying is that I'd like to once again hide the latter set of
attributes, if we get a different set of public attributes.
This way the developer has some control over whether every little
variable in a class is exposed.
Either that, or add a keyword that specifies
Luke Kanies schrieb:
Hi all,
These problems keep cropping up, and it seems like we need a more
comprehensive solution.
The current 'master' branch has permission problems in puppetmasterd
(as implied), and it's basically a race condition that shows up again
and again.
[...]
Luke Kanies schrieb:
On Oct 31, 2008, at 10:33 AM, jerico wrote:
I don't agree on that. It might be a specially declarative and less
procedural/imperative language and is probably not turing complete (no
idea about that, I didn't try the proof!) But maybe this is just an
argument about
22 matches
Mail list logo
