On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Trevor Vaughan
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a very interesting conversation and I'm monitoring to see where it
> ends up.
>
I see what you did there ;) Thanks for the chuckle.
>
> You're going to want to have a central location for
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Nan Liu wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:43 AM R.I.Pienaar wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: "Kylo Ginsberg"
>> > To: "puppet-dev"
>> > Sent:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:43 AM R.I.Pienaar wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Kylo Ginsberg"
> > To: "puppet-dev"
> > Sent: Wednesday, 2 March, 2016 06:59:08
> > Subject: Re: [Puppet-dev] metaparam question
>
>
Ugh, I forgot about that. I fixed it over in IPTables but may not have gone
back to cgroups since it was pretty much deprecated under systemd in EL7.
Try this one:
https://github.com/simp/pupmod-simp-iptables/blob/master/lib/puppet/provider/iptables_rule/manage.rb
.
Basically, nailing up the
> On Feb 6, 2016, at 4:09 PM, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
>
> Hi Shawn,
>
> This is very much possible, but the implementation is going to be a true hack
> that pollutes the global namespace until
> https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP-4002
>
> On 2 Mar 2016, at 21:16, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
>
> R.I., did I just hear you make a suggestion for writing fact DDL files? Not
> sure how I feel about that, they're a pain to deal with and confuse users.
Not specifically. Types already have doc strings similar would
R.I., did I just hear you make a suggestion for writing fact DDL files? Not
sure how I feel about that, they're a pain to deal with and confuse users.
The features that I would like to add my vote for:
* Fact TTLs
* Custom fact execution timeouts
* Fact execution timeouts
* Fact parallelization
Now that I'm thinking more about it, I 100% want this.
There have been quite a few occasions where I didn't want to pass back an
epic ton of fact data just to change a small amount of logic.
Being able to bookend my resources without a hacky exec chain would be
great.
Propagating that check to
Hi all,
This is a very interesting conversation and I'm monitoring to see where it
ends up.
You're going to want to have a central location for organizing this
information between nodes since there are no guarantees that any two nodes
can get bi-directional communications between each other.
- Original Message -
> From: "Kylo Ginsberg"
> To: "puppet-dev"
> Sent: Wednesday, 2 March, 2016 06:59:08
> Subject: Re: [Puppet-dev] metaparam question
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:02 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
>
>>
10 matches
Mail list logo