Hi all,
DISCLAIMER: not entirely sure if it's appropriate to announce this
here, but I thought I'd give it a try. If it's not appropriate,
repremand me and I'll make sure to never do it again :)
We're very excited to let you know that there's going to be a puppetcamp
for Southeast Asia on June
Hello,
We are currently evaluating Puppet and Chef on several criteria and we
have found a big difference between the amount of information
retrieved by Facter in Puppet and the amount of information retrieved
by Ohai in Chef for a same virtual machine.
There is about 2000 lines in the JSON file
Does this require that a human being has to be in the loop every time a
node joins the site? How would one automate 100% the provisioning of new
hosts? With the current system, I can turn on auto-sign and have some
simple rules for which nodes I will accept, and trust in the knowledge that
I
Thanks, it was the solution that I tried after posting this. I had seen in
a puppet bug something about regex matchers at either side of the inherits
expression and thought that it could be possible.
I had not thought about doing the double definition, the textual one and
the regex. Thanks for
Hi Jeff,
On 11-05-2012 0:08, Jeff McCune wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:08 PM, mparrad marco.parr...@gmail.com
mailto:marco.parr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys, I realized that If I make the file udp_status.rb and I
put on D:\Program Files (x86)\Puppet
Labs\Puppet\facter\lib\facter,
From the documentation I have found that, theoretically, I can install a
module from a tar ball or zip. I need that feature because I have to
configure a master that, at the present time, is stored in an offline
machine (it should serve modules, libraries and facts related with our
local
John,
Sorry for not updating this post with the additional details. And I agree
with you on everything you just said (probably not regression, should work,
shouldn't be doing what I'm doing ...) and I plan on figuring that out
today ... as I need a workaround for this issue now. ;)
And also
Does that mean there is currently not a way to do this straight in foreman?
This is something I would like also (as of yesterday :P). I don't really
want to script my own solution based off foreman data ... cause maybe my
'defaults' will change and I would love to have that tracked in foreman
Christophe,
Let me ask a question: what extra information is Ohai providing (that
Facter does not currently) that you would be using in your
manifests/cookbooks? Usually people utilize similar bits of
Facter-provided information (operatingsystem, release version, ipaddress,
interfaces, domain,
Continuing discussion at thread in foreman users @
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/foreman-users/uhW_EwO4LLg
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
I reply myself... --force is my friend :)
On Friday, May 11, 2012 3:15:39 PM UTC+2, David Campos wrote:
From the documentation I have found that, theoretically, I can install a
module from a tar ball or zip. I need that feature because I have to
configure a master that, at the present time,
Hi all,
I've been improving our sysctl module and come across an interesting
design problem I'd like feedback on.
I approached the re-factor with Hiera in mind - I would put all our
sysctl data in Hiera hash and pull that into a hiera_hash, merging the
hierarchy of data and allowing higher
I see this with people looking to move to the hierarchical system that
Hiera brings. It essentially boils down to How do I do this without
having a ton of hierarchy levels?. Usually we tend to recommend using the
hierarchy to hit the 80% mark for the data you need in your modules.
Anything
On Thursday, May 10, 2012 3:05:38 PM UTC-7, jcbollinger wrote:
On May 10, 2:04 pm, Daniel Sauble djsau...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On Thursday, May 10, 2012 11:37:34 AM UTC-7, ohad wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Daniel Sauble
djsau...@puppetlabs.comwrote:
On
I thought the answer to this would be tagging. User a conditional and a tag
such that a class is only included if a tag has been set. The problem is
that the tags that you specify with puppet-kick do not get evaluated when
the node manifests are running. There is a low priority feature request
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Daniel Sauble djsau...@puppetlabs.comwrote:
On Thursday, May 10, 2012 3:05:38 PM UTC-7, jcbollinger wrote:
On May 10, 2:04 pm, Daniel Sauble djsau...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On Thursday, May 10, 2012 11:37:34 AM UTC-7, ohad wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012
puppet 2.6.4
puppet --configprint modulepath
/home/user/.puppet/modules:/usr/share/puppet/modules
I have the following file defined: /home/user/.puppet/modules/apacheWS/
manifests
#init.pp
class apacheWS {
case $operatingsystem{
ubuntu:{ $apache=apache2}
}
package
On a clean Debian system - without Rubygems installed - I want to install a
Rubygem package (ruby-ldap) with Puppet. So the package has gem as
package Provider.
This is my manifest so far (I kept it simple):
# test.pp
Package { ensure = 'installed' }
package {
'rubygems'
Unfortunately, you'll need to rename your apacheWS folder to apachews.
On Thursday, May 10, 2012 4:09:58 PM UTC-7, Amit Shah wrote:
puppet 2.6.4
puppet --configprint modulepath
/home/user/.puppet/modules:/usr/share/puppet/modules
I have the following file defined:
On Friday, May 11, 2012 5:56:10 AM UTC-7, Marc Zampetti wrote:
Does this require that a human being has to be in the loop every time a
node joins the site? How would one automate 100% the provisioning of new
hosts? With the current system, I can turn on auto-sign and have some
simple rules
The connection to the Forge is being established to try to resolve
dependencies; the `--ignore-dependencies` flag (which is implied by
`--force`) is what you're looking for. :)
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 8:35 AM, David Campos noymn.the.archan...@gmail.com
wrote:
I reply myself... --force is my
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Pieter van de Bruggen
pie...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
The connection to the Forge is being established to try to resolve
dependencies; the `--ignore-dependencies` flag (which is implied by
`--force`) is what you're looking for. :)
Do we need a more explicit
Hi Gary,
Not quite... Let me go into more detail.
I'm trying to handle sysctl perfectly which is probably my real
problem. Hiera's ability to merge hashes together makes it perfect for
arriving at one set of sysctl options for a server based on business
logic (my hierarchy). For Hiera data
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Matt mjbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Reading the documentation so far, it looks like it has the option to query
a different repository other than forge. The question I have is if we have
modules that we need to host internally how can we serve them up to be
I suppose you could create a separate class for the entries that will
be fact-driven versus Hiera-driven. You wouldn't be able to use a
single template, but either augeas or concat should work. I wouldn't
call it elegant, but the code might be less ugly.
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Luke
While we might want to check the Forge for dependencies, not having a
network connection shouldn't be an error when installing from a tarball.
That is a bug.
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/13542
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Randall Hansen rand...@puppetlabs.comwrote:
On Fri, May
I see (and I saw your post on create_resources - I tested it out and also
noticed that inheritance didn't work as expected for me either). My
initial thought would be to try and break down the individual sysctl
entries as individual resources that could be declared with a defined type
(as Aaron
I have a similar issue with Hiera when decisions depend on more than facts
alone... thus exluded from the hierarchy.
In example, the hostname can tell a node is a database server (fact: role)
but only a custom group will tell it should run Oracle 10g or 11g (product)
and the proper sysctl
Hello Gary,
Thank you for your answer.
First, I should have written about raw meaningful data rather than raw
useful data because you are right that a lot of the extra information are
not actually useful :)
For information, the aim is not to use the information in modules, but to
fill a CMDB
Hi Christophe,
The facter tag is something a user would have to use when they release
their module. There are many more custom facts on the Forge that
simply aren't tagged. Your thread inspired me to create a feature
request for searching specifically for facts:
On Friday, May 11, 2012 11:42:52 AM UTC-7, Ryan Coleman wrote:
Hi Christophe,
The facter tag is something a user would have to use when they release
their module. There are many more custom facts on the Forge that
simply aren't tagged.
Given that the current module definitions
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Philip Brown p...@bolthole.com wrote:
Given that the current module definitions require known locations for factor
extensions, I find this a bit odd.
How about making the uploader autotag 'facter' any module that has files
under lib/facter ?
That's precisely
Christophe,
I would suggest not using Puppet or Chef to pass data around
constantly that isn't going to be used by your actual code. Instead,
you might want to set up a proper SNMP infrastructure such that you
can get all of the information that you want and poll your network
devices, etc... with
Hi
I want to know the comprehensive comparison between the puppet and chef ,
also include puppet and cfengine. What are the different,
each of which has advantages and disadvantages, I had read this article .
http://bitfieldconsulting.com/puppet-vs-chef
I need more information,
Thank you
34 matches
Mail list logo
