Jo,
this thread is starting to confuse me, I am no longer sure what you're
suggesting, precisely.
a) Make it possible to nullify notifications under certain circumstances.
b) Make it possible to ignore file owner/mode for files that exist already.
While (b) is rather tasteless to me (as is the
On 15.06.2012 21:19, Byron Appelt wrote:
I have an application package that needs to be installed on certain
application servers but before it can be installed, database access has
to be setup on a database server.
I have figured out how to export a resource on the app server that gets
On 16.06.2012 02:42, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Jun 15, 2012, at 8:19 AM, Nan Liu wrote:
To support purging, the puppet type need to to be able to query all
instances of the resource. In this case because ssh_authorized_keys
can write to different file locations, it does not have the ability to
detect
On 16.06.2012 02:21, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Jun 15, 2012, at 3:13 PM, jcbollinger wrote:
You seem to be interpreting many of the responses as assertions that
you shouldn't want what you're asking for. I don't think anyone is
saying that, at least not at the level of generality at which you
Hi,
Am I close?
Yes, but some details are far out ;-)
On 06/16/2012 09:58 AM, Marc Lucke wrote:
I think I an interate through the arrays using an inline_template in a
define to run an exec using creates (to look for the .private file and
generate it only if it doesn't exist).
I don't see
Hi Puppet Users,
I have just started playing with Puppet and Hiera. I am curious if it is
possible to control how hiera does variable lookup within a module I am
creating to test it.
I have read through the documentation I can find on Hiera and Puppet however I
cannot find any documentation
Has anyone ever got this right before?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/DiGW9XkhIF4J.
To post to this group, send email to
Good morning.
Scenario: install SNMP (agent and daemon), change config file and restart
of service.
What's wrong? The logs showed that AFTER the new config file is applied,
the service (snmpd) is restarted, but looks like this is not true.
I arrived to this conclusion because if just after
Hi.
I have the following facts available:
# facter | grep oper
operatingsystem = CentOS
operatingsystemrelease = 6.2
Now, if I wish to use conditionals on these facts, I have to do it like
this:
case $operatingsystem {}
case $::operatingsystemrelease {}
I'm puzzled as to why can't I just use
I understand that only the CA cert needs to be copied on the LB and not the
private key, as the private key is just for signing the agents
certificates. Just wanted to note that the CA also needs
SSLCARevocationFile, for revocation to work it seems.
The only other concept that is not clear to
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 7:06 AM, kai kaiva...@gmail.com wrote:
I understand that only the CA cert needs to be copied on the LB and not
the private key, as the private key is just for signing the agents
certificates. Just wanted to note that the CA also needs
SSLCARevocationFile, for
Hi Jakov,
the two semicolons locate these variables as being in top-scope/variables
outside of any specific module.
otherwise it might be $modulename::variable
Does that help at all?
W
On Jun 18, 2012, at 8:25 AM, Jakov Sosic wrote:
Hi.
I have the following facts available:
# facter |
Thanks Justin! It appears that the extract was modified in some way.
On Saturday, June 16, 2012 5:27:48 PM UTC-5, Justin Stoller wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:07 PM, hulk15 wrote:
Hey guys,
Trying to install PE for a PoC and have run into the following: Has
anyone seen this?
Hi,
On 18.06.2012, at 17:14, Wolf Noble wrote:
Hi Jakov,
the two semicolons locate these variables as being in top-scope/variables
outside of any specific module.
please note that these are colons (:) no semicolons(;).
otherwise it might be $modulename::variable
Does that help at
I'm having the same problem, but I never saw a solution in this thread.
I've been over the permissions for config.ru and /var/lib/puppet about a
1000 times and can't see any permissions problems.
-rw---. 1 puppet puppet 431 Jun 18 00:07 /etc/puppet/rack/config.ru
(I've also tried 700, 770,
Jeff, thank you very much for taking the time to answer all my questions. I
really appreciate it. This thread had helped me a lot in my journey to
mastering Puppet.
Thank you again!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To view this
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Chris Price ch...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
Hi Matt,
I think it would be worth opening a ticket for this
( http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppet/issues/new ).
Hi Chris,
This is now #15086. Hopefully there's enough info on the ticket to reproduce.
The VM
D'oh
On Jun 18, 2012, at 11:26 AM, Martin Alfke wrote:
Hi,
On 18.06.2012, at 17:14, Wolf Noble wrote:
Hi Jakov,
the two semicolons locate these variables as being in top-scope/variables
outside of any specific module.
please note that these are colons (:) no semicolons(;).
I will
On Monday, 18 June 2012 13:02:33 UTC+2, Peter wrote:
Hi Puppet Users,
I have just started playing with Puppet and Hiera. I am curious if it is
possible to control how hiera does variable lookup within a module I am
creating to test it.
I have read through the documentation I can
jbrown,
Sorry for not posting my solution. I've been working on this install for
weeks, and I *did* overcome this error, but I've had to overcome so many
errors, I can't recall the exact fix. iirc, the solution might have been
installing rubygem-rack through yum as opposed to gems.
In any
On Jun 15, 2012, at 8:21 PM, Brian Gallew wrote:
As has already been suggested, make the change yourself, submit a patch. You
have indicated several times that this isn't that big a change. Further,
it's a change that is clearly only of benefit to you at this point, so trying
to convince
On Jun 18, 2012, at 12:55 AM, Felix Frank wrote:
this thread is starting to confuse me, I am no longer sure what you're
suggesting, precisely.
a) Make it possible to nullify notifications under certain circumstances.
b) Make it possible to ignore file owner/mode for files that exist already.
What is the status of compatibility with Puppet 2.7.16+ and Ruby
1.9? I searched through this group and found some older posts. I am
not certain what the core issues are (and there's probably a
PuppetLabs page for it, I bet).
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Forrie for...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the status of compatibility with Puppet 2.7.16+ and Ruby
1.9? I searched through this group and found some older posts. I am
not certain what the core issues are (and there's probably a
PuppetLabs page for it, I bet).
Hi, was just wondering if there's a way to create a local forge
repositories to host our local modules? Has anyone done that?
I found this post, http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/5033.
that was one year ago. Wondering if there's a way to do it now?
Thanks.
--
You received this message
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Lian Zhu leanne@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, was just wondering if there's a way to create a local forge
repositories to host our local modules? Has anyone done that?
I found this post, http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/5033.
that was one year ago. Wondering
Hi All,
I've been trying to use Hiera for node classification, my sit.pp is simple:
node default {
hiera_include(classes)
}
which has been working well with simple class definitions like:
user@host$ cat testagent.yaml2012-06-18 14:55:48 jon pts/13
---
classes:
- motd
Is anyone
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:02:10PM +0300, Ohad Levy wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Forrie for...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the status of compatibility with Puppet 2.7.16+ and Ruby
1.9? I searched through this group and found some older posts. I am
not certain what the core
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:02:10PM +0300, Ohad Levy wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Forrie for...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the status of compatibility with Puppet 2.7.16+ and Ruby
1.9? I searched through this group and found some older
posts. I am
not certain what the core
On Jun 18, 2012, at 2:08 AM, David Schmitt wrote:
I say running puppet *hot* on a system *when* restarting a service might
create a booboo is a bad idea. Emphasis on *hot* and *when*. For both
emphasises, there are solutions (noop, cron, schedules, mcollective, dssh).
Using a different CM
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Lian Zhu leanne@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, was just wondering if there's a way to create a local forge repositories
to host our local modules? Has anyone done that?
I found this post, http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/5033.
that was one year ago. Wondering
On Monday, June 18, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
*boggle* Um, so your configuration management system is not part of your
change management implementation? That's what you just said, and it makes no
sense.
Jo,
Not to speak for David but in general - the point is that they are different
On Monday, June 18, 2012 12:18:51 PM UTC-7, jon wrote:
If so, is it possible to pass in parameterized classes this way, like:
user@host$ cat openstackall.yaml 2012-06-18 14:56:01 jon pts/13
---
classes:
- openstack::all: {
public_address: %{ipaddress_eth0},
public_interface:
On Monday, June 18, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
*boggle* Um, so your configuration management system is not part of your
change management implementation? That's what you just said, and it makes no
sense.
On Jun 18, 2012, at 1:10 PM, Eric Shamow wrote:
Not to speak for David but in
Hi,
Has anyone had success getting the Inventory Service running in RHEL 6?
My Puppet Nodes are getting the following error:
[root@puppetnode-01 ~]# puppetd --debug --verbose --no-daemonize
...
err: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: Error 400 on SERVER:
Could not autoload
… Now that I'm excessively caffeinated (I'm not actually sure if that's better,
or worse, than my previous state, but)…
On Jun 18, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Jun 18, 2012, at 12:55 AM, Felix Frank wrote:
this thread is starting to confuse me, I am no longer sure what you're
Michael,
Thanks for the quick response. I'll take a closer look at the instructions
and see if they work in my environment.
I appreciate the thoughtful reply.
Cheers,
Justin
On Monday, June 18, 2012 12:31:28 PM UTC-5, Michael Altfield wrote:
jbrown,
Sorry for not posting my solution.
On Jun 18, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Wolf Noble wrote:
Well, a in the service of b -- but as a general point, I think that every
notify/subscribe should be tune-able as to which things changing will cause
the action to take place.
Not to continue this thread longer than it needs to go, but
On Monday, June 18, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
Same software, same management functions, same configs… just a different
permissions change on new installations. Should I really duplicate the entire
module, and manage all changes in both places? And forever try to manage
which host
On Jun 18, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Jun 18, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Wolf Noble wrote:
Well, a in the service of b -- but as a general point, I think that every
notify/subscribe should be tune-able as to which things changing will cause
the action to take place.
Not to continue this
On Jun 18, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Wolf Noble wrote:
No, it's not the easiest way to break your environment. but it is a direct
line to future obfuscated breakage, red herrings, and new and exciting ways
to waste lots of engineers' time trying to suss out what in the the last N
changes broke
--Original Message--
From: Felix Frank
Sender: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
ReplyTo: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] can we avoid notify/subscribe firing on a mode
change?
Sent: Jun 14, 2012 7:18 AM
On 06/14/2012 12:39 PM, Jo
Right, sure. Instead of 18 lines of puppet policy that do exactly what I need,
I should instead go create an infrastructure based around a barely
documentation and SLOW part of puppet. Because who wants finer granularity for
your controls, when you could implement a huge infrastructure
Brutal you are.
-yoda
Sent via BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com
Sender: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 17:07:21
To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] can we avoid
Okay back to the original problem. It's become a bit hard to follow.
Without code change to puppet you're stumped. But without knowing your systems
a combination of package based deployments and excluding mode or owner maybe
will get you by?
But with puppet code change, would a way of doing
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Wendell Araujo
johnnatah.ara...@gmail.com wrote:
Good morning!
I have a server running Nagios and would like to monitor the service in my
puppet server puppetmaster. Has anyone managed to do this?
grateful
Wendell
So this doesn't exactly answer your
Jo,
Let's not make this personal. You don't know how old I am or what
infrastructures I've managed.
You don't need to use Hiera. You can use any data lookup tool you like to do
the same thing.
What you are seeing is not an official stance of any kind, it's a spontaneous
community reaction.
I saw a post a little while back about this, but didn't see the
details of the solution. So I'm posting to see if someone can explain
to me the correct way to do this in puppet 2.7+.
I have a variable ldap_server that is used inside some templates.
Some of my nodes use ldap1.company.com an some
48 matches
Mail list logo
