Hi!
After a few hours of trial and error my problem is solved.
Here is the Solution:
/etc/apache2/sites-enabled/02-foreman.conf:
SSLEngine on
SSLCertificateFile #Here you have to use
SSLCertificateKeyFile #your own signed certificate + key
/etc/puppet/foreman.yaml:
...
On 3/13/15 10:45 AM, Alex Miroshnik wrote:
Hi Guys,
I need to install multiple packages on the Ubuntu 14.0.4 using puppet.
All packages are listed in the file (about 100 packages) one package
name on the row. Is this possible? If it is possible, could you please
give me a hint how to do
The ruby call you're looking for is each_pair used like this:
% scope.lookupvar('hash').each_pair do |key,value| -%
%= key % = %= value %
% end -%
On Sunday, March 15, 2015 at 9:16:08 PM UTC+11, Luca Gervasi wrote:
Hello,
i'm trying to achieve aconfiguration where i can applt a non
I would consider using something like hiera and loading the packages from a
YAML file. It is trivial to convert your existing file to YAML.
On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 10:15:07 PM UTC+11, Alex Miroshnik wrote:
Hi Guys,
I need to install multiple packages on the Ubuntu 14.0.4 using puppet.
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 at 10:46:05 PM UTC-5, Alex Harvey wrote:
Can't you avoid this problem altogether by determining the PHP version in
your custom provider code? Then you wouldn't need a custom fact at all,
and in your manifest, have the custom type require the PHP package.
Great
Have a look at how the build in RPM provider works, for instance:
https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppet/blob/master/lib/puppet/provider/package/rpm.rb#L37
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 2:46:05 PM UTC+11, Alex Harvey wrote:
Can't you avoid this problem altogether by determining the PHP version
hi Alex,
thanks for getting it works. But, what is the reasons having
environment.conf? Under which type of circumstance that we need this
configuration file? Thanks Again!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To unsubscribe
Hi all.
I am testing hiera in our enviroment and I wonder if I can manage
everything from hiera without using the main site.pp.
Do you think is the right way? or I should use site.pp as well?
Here is what I am testing and so far so good.
- hiera.yaml
---
:backends:
- yaml
:hierarchy:
hi all,
I am wondering if I would like to retrieve the mount points values from the
facter. From the facter -p, I can see that I do have the information. e.g.
partitions = {
sda1={
mount=/boot,
uuid=4e5014d1-080a-4182-aa89-bc83159b85fb,
filesystem=ext4,
size=614400},
sda2={
mount=/,
On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 11:50:08 AM UTC+11, Hiu wrote:
hi Alex,
thanks for getting it works. But, what is the reasons having
environment.conf? Under which type of circumstance that we need this
configuration file? Thanks Again!
As you can see from the documentation, environments
Thanks for the answers. I'll be having my support team build me another VM
to evaluate PE on. Wish we had gone this way six months ago.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:00 PM Rilindo Foster rili...@gmail.com wrote:
1) Does it work with Foreman?
Yes, though if you are not using Foreman for
and to add one more thing - I do see some values coming out of the second
backend - out of the role level.. but not everything. I don't know how
this could be getting some but not all..
Maybe I have my wires crossed on something, but I think everything is in
place...
On Wednesday,
Hi all,
Looking for some best practice, guideline, documentation puppet testing
in all its aspect, sometimes I try to figure out the following :
How does one tests roles and profiles ?
Do we still write rspec-puppet for profiles ? Since we are using
modules that have there own unit (rspec)
I've found the time to deliver a multiple hiera backend for our ops guys,
and I'm seeing some weird behaviour.
With a single backend, it works great - add host level configs in the host
hierarchy, and common stuff in what we had a 'role' hierarchy.
I have since split the backends, so there is
14 matches
Mail list logo