[Puppet Users] Re: Explanation of the resource package, little information in reference type

2012-01-17 Thread Antonio Xanxess
Hi Felix, You've finally found the problem. Indeed you were right, it was no problem of the resource package, had a problem with DNS name resolution prevented our local repository. Currently we solve this, so thank you very much for the help offered. A new greeting and apologies for the

[Puppet Users] Re: Explanation of the resource package, little information in reference type

2012-01-13 Thread Antonio Xanxess
Hi Frank, Thanks for the reply, but in principle I think that there is no need for this procedure because the resource itself package can do, besides not a good practice to patch existing functionality. The problem is that there is little documentation about it, I would like someone who has dealt

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Explanation of the resource package, little information in reference type

2012-01-13 Thread Felix Frank
On 01/13/2012 09:31 AM, Antonio Xanxess wrote: Hi Frank, Actually it's Felix :) Thanks for the reply, but in principle I think that there is no need for this procedure because the resource itself package can do, besides not a good practice to patch existing functionality. Uhm, what? o_O

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Explanation of the resource package, little information in reference type

2012-01-13 Thread Walter Heck
I'm pretty sure he means that that code is already there (note: currently too laz... euh busy to look that up), he just doesn't know how to make it apply. On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:22, Felix Frank felix.fr...@alumni.tu-berlin.de wrote: On 01/13/2012 09:31 AM, Antonio Xanxess wrote: Hi Frank,

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Explanation of the resource package, little information in reference type

2012-01-13 Thread Felix Frank
On 01/13/2012 11:05 AM, Walter Heck wrote: I'm pretty sure he means that that code is already there (note: currently too laz... euh busy to look that up), he just doesn't know how to make it apply. Oh, I see. Apologies to the OP then, got that totally the wrong way. I've taken a quick look.