On May 15, 1:23 pm, Steve Roberts strob...@strobe.net wrote:
I've contacted the person at puppetlabs we
have been working with to get his take on things. may even be part of
a professional services implementation for him at this point.
I hope that your contact will be able to help you work
On May 14, 9:05 pm, Steve Roberts strob...@strobe.net wrote:
On Apr 30, 6:10 am, jcbollinger john.bollin...@stjude.org wrote:
It is conceivable that providers for Windows or OS X, which use
different primary keys for their user and group databases, could be
given special parameters that
On May 15, 9:19 am, jcbollinger john.bollin...@stjude.org wrote:
That's excellent advice, but regardless of POSIX, there is a wide
variety of real-world systems that do not enforce such a constraint,
and there are many machines that have users and/or groups with
duplicate IDs. Therefore
On Apr 30, 6:10 am, jcbollinger john.bollin...@stjude.org wrote:
On Apr 27, 6:21 pm, Steve Roberts strob...@strobe.net wrote:
Ah. No. You're still missing a critical aspect of this situation:
independent of the system tools used (useradd, etc.), the UNIX
architecture provides username /
On Apr 27, 6:21 pm, Steve Roberts strob...@strobe.net wrote:
On Apr 18, 6:46 am, jcbollinger john.bollin...@stjude.org wrote:
On Apr 17, 5:04 pm,SteveRobertsstrob...@strobe.net wrote:
On Apr 17, 6:25 am, jcbollinger john.bollin...@stjude.org wrote:
well, allowdupe doesn't fix the
On Apr 18, 6:46 am, jcbollinger john.bollin...@stjude.org wrote:
On Apr 17, 5:04 pm,SteveRobertsstrob...@strobe.net wrote:
On Apr 17, 6:25 am, jcbollinger john.bollin...@stjude.org wrote:
well, allowdupe doesn't fix the issue only masks it. I knew about
taht attribute but
it just adds a
On Apr 17, 5:04 pm, Steve Roberts strob...@strobe.net wrote:
On Apr 17, 6:25 am, jcbollinger john.bollin...@stjude.org wrote:
well, allowdupe doesn't fix the issue only masks it. I knew about
taht attribute but
it just adds a duped group instead of making right the user/group.
Indeed, but
On Apr 16, 10:03 pm, Steve Roberts strob...@strobe.net wrote:
I'm hoping I'm just missing something simple.
I ran across this in my deployment setup and have replicated in a
simple set of manifests. command output and the manifests below.
basically start with a user/group name but it had
On Apr 17, 6:25 am, jcbollinger john.bollin...@stjude.org wrote:
On Apr 16, 10:03 pm, Steve Roberts strob...@strobe.net wrote:
I thought one of the key ideas for puppet was the ability to define a
manifest and puppet would make the machine look like that manifest.
That is correct. Another
