On 12/07/2012 11:05 AM, Andrew Beresford wrote:
How about creating a processorcorecount and processorthreadcount with
correct meanings? That then leaves the option to deprecate
processorcount.
I've realised that at some point in the past I have created a
processorthreadcount fact because I
On Friday, December 7, 2012 9:05:32 PM UTC+11, Andrew Beresford wrote:
How about creating a processorcorecount and processorthreadcount with
correct meanings? That then leaves the option to deprecate
processorcount.
I've realised that at some point in the past I have created a
How about creating a processorcorecount and processorthreadcount with
correct meanings? That then leaves the option to deprecate
processorcount.
I've realised that at some point in the past I have created a
processorthreadcount fact because I needed a consistent source of this
information on both
I prefer the core count definition, but whatever it is, it should be
consistent between Linux and Solaris.
Yes it certainly should be the same on all platforms - the question is if
we change it who is going to be impacted and how can we manage the change?
I believe the vast majority of
Apologies,
I re-read your post and understand what you mean.
I prefer the core count definition, but whatever it is, it should be
consistent between Linux and Solaris.
Andrew
On Wednesday, 5 December 2012 04:37:19 UTC, Alex Harvey wrote:
On Monday, December 3, 2012 9:54:49 PM UTC+11,
On Monday, December 3, 2012 9:54:49 PM UTC+11, Andrew Beresford wrote:
Feature :)
I do understand what the code is doing but question whether that's what it
should be doing. While it's ultimately a matter of opinion, it violates
the 'principle of least surprise' for me and also my
Feature :)
This all comes down to the architecture of your processor.
Your SPARC64-VII processors is a quad-core, two-way SMT processor. So, you
have one physical CPU, four cores, and 8 threads.
physicalprocessorcount is derived from the output of psrinfo -p
and processorcount is derived
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 12:02:21 PM UTC+11, Alex Harvey wrote:
Hi all,
This relates to a discussion we are having in the Redmine ticket
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/11612.
I am extending the processorcount, physicalprocessorcount and processorX
facts that exist for
