I know this is old, but ran into it due to some concat dep cycle errors I
had.
But the way you can do this without stages is with collections. If you're
using the apt module, you'd
Class['myrepositories'] -> Apt::Source<| |>
On Friday, June 7, 2013 2:59:17 PM UTC-7, Jakov Sosic wrote:
>
> On
On 06/04/2013 03:43 PM, jcbollinger wrote:
If you stick to simple uses of stages, on the other hand, then you
probably don't have any potential gains over Puppet's sharper, more
precise alternatives in the first place.
I use stage (before main) for setting up yum repositories. That's
because
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:39:27 AM UTC-5, R.I. Pienaar wrote:
>
>
> stages is generally just bad and you should find better ways to do what
> you
> want, maybe using chaining or something else.
>
>
+1
Really. Stages are a very blunt tool. If you try to do anything very
complicated with
- Original Message -
> From: "Mario Abajo"
> To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 3:28:23 AM
> Subject: [Puppet Users] Stages and concat
>
> Hi!,
> I'm working on a module that's being called in a different stage tha
Hi!,
I'm working on a module that's being called in a different stage than main,
a previous one. THis modules is composed of various "defines" and use the
concat module inside. My question is ¿may i use concat different stages? i
was having cycle problems because of the class concat::setup.
Is t
