On 7/8/2010 10:33 PM, Joe McDonagh wrote:
On 07/02/2010 04:45 AM, David Schmitt wrote:
On 6/30/2010 1:47 AM, Joe McDonagh wrote:
Also, it would be *huge* to be able to append to vars. Right now I open
fw ports via a variable in the node def like:
$open_tcp_ports = 22,443
If I could always
On 07/02/2010 04:45 AM, David Schmitt wrote:
On 6/30/2010 1:47 AM, Joe McDonagh wrote:
Also, it would be *huge* to be able to append to vars. Right now I open
fw ports via a variable in the node def like:
$open_tcp_ports = 22,443
If I could always open 22 in the node def, but += inside
On 7/5/2010 12:04 AM, Matt wrote:
On 2 July 2010 09:50, David Schmittda...@dasz.at wrote:
On 6/30/2010 10:57 AM, Matt wrote:
On 29 June 2010 17:22, Luke Kaniesl...@puppetlabs.comwrote:
Hi all,
Given the number of threads on variable scoping recently, it's pretty
clear
we need to
On 5 July 2010 09:15, David Schmitt da...@dasz.at wrote:
On 7/5/2010 12:04 AM, Matt wrote:
On 2 July 2010 09:50, David Schmittda...@dasz.at wrote:
On 6/30/2010 10:57 AM, Matt wrote:
On 29 June 2010 17:22, Luke Kaniesl...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
Hi all,
Given the number of threads on
On 2 July 2010 09:50, David Schmitt da...@dasz.at wrote:
On 6/30/2010 10:57 AM, Matt wrote:
On 29 June 2010 17:22, Luke Kaniesl...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
Hi all,
Given the number of threads on variable scoping recently, it's pretty
clear
we need to change how it works. Markus has a lot
On 6/30/2010 1:47 AM, Joe McDonagh wrote:
Also, it would be *huge* to be able to append to vars. Right now I open
fw ports via a variable in the node def like:
$open_tcp_ports = 22,443
If I could always open 22 in the node def, but += inside classes for
httpd, nfs, etc. things would be nice.
On 6/30/2010 10:57 AM, Matt wrote:
On 29 June 2010 17:22, Luke Kaniesl...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
Hi all,
Given the number of threads on variable scoping recently, it's pretty clear
we need to change how it works. Markus has a lot of this redone in his
futures branch, and I'm asking him to
On 6/30/2010 5:07 PM, Patrick Mohr wrote:
By the way, ignoring the technical aspect, how do you think defined
should work in this case? In this case, what aleart should be printed,
or what error should be printed? This is a rather contrived example, but
I'm not really sure what puppet should
On 29 June 2010 17:22, Luke Kanies l...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
Hi all,
Given the number of threads on variable scoping recently, it's pretty clear
we need to change how it works. Markus has a lot of this redone in his
futures branch, and I'm asking him to fully describe what the results will
- Luke Kanies l...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
Hi all,
Given the number of threads on variable scoping recently, it's pretty
clear we need to change how it works. Markus has a lot of this redone
in his futures branch, and I'm asking him to fully describe what the
results will be when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If possible, I would like to see a special variables derivative of class
that allow for multiple inheritance so that you could pull variables
from multiple top-level classes and override them at a single point.
This would prevent the multiple tree to
- Trevor Vaughan tvaug...@onyxpoint.com wrote:
Also, I'm not entirely convinced that variables can't be overridden.
I understand that the final compilation is order independent, but I
believe that the initial run is file order dependent. I.e. if you
don't declare an 'include' before an
Fair enough.
If it is a bug, then consider that suggestion null and void.
Did you note that defined() should not blow up if you don't have the
class on your system at all?
Sorry, running in text only mode today :-/.
Thanks,
Trevor
On 6/30/10, R.I.Pienaar r...@devco.net wrote:
- Trevor
'lo
- Trevor Vaughan tvaug...@onyxpoint.com wrote:
Did you note that defined() should not blow up if you don't have the
class on your system at all?
hehe never seen this behavior but did just test, I'd say that another bug worth
filing separately
Sorry, running in text only mode
On Jun 30, 2010, at 3:09 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
- Trevor Vaughan tvaug...@onyxpoint.com wrote:
Also, I'm not entirely convinced that variables can't be overridden.
I understand that the final compilation is order independent, but I
believe that the initial run is file order
hey
- Patrick Mohr kc7...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 30, 2010, at 3:09 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
- Trevor Vaughan tvaug...@onyxpoint.com wrote:
Also, I'm not entirely convinced that variables can't be
overridden.
I understand that the final compilation is order independent, but
On Jun 30, 2010, at 8:33 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
hey
- Patrick Mohr kc7...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 30, 2010, at 3:09 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
- Trevor Vaughan tvaug...@onyxpoint.com wrote:
Also, I'm not entirely convinced that variables can't be
overridden.
I understand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FYI, it's this bug: http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/3490
That's definitely going to need to get fixed before the module forge is
really going to take off.
Trevor
On 06/30/2010 10:05 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
'lo
- Trevor Vaughan
Hi all,
Given the number of threads on variable scoping recently, it's pretty
clear we need to change how it works. Markus has a lot of this redone
in his futures branch, and I'm asking him to fully describe what the
results will be when that's merged, but my guess is that there are
On 2010-06-29 19:47, Joe McDonagh wrote:
On 06/29/2010 12:22 PM, Luke Kanies wrote:
Hi all,
Given the number of threads on variable scoping recently, it's pretty
clear we need to change how it works. Markus has a lot of this redone
in his futures branch, and I'm asking him to fully describe
20 matches
Mail list logo
