Let's see: Then I could do
Stage { ensure = enforcement, }
at the top and get the behavior I want:
prerequisites are satisfied before moving on.
But, what's the use case for relationship?
Why would I want that?
consider three stages in various
combinations of enforcement (e) and relationship
On 06/11/2011 01:06 PM, Nan Liu wrote:
I'm not sure if I captured the intention well, essentially still want
a way to coarsely organize classes, however without adding any
dependency requirement. So deploy user accounts/customization after
application deployment, however still proceed with
Chris Phillips ch...@untrepid.com wrote:
On 10 June 2011 02:50, Jacob Helwig ja...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:42:54 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
One problem people producing modules that make use of stages are hitting is
that
On 10 Jun 2011 07:52, Jacob Helwig ja...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
Chris Phillips ch...@untrepid.com wrote:
On 10 June 2011 02:50, Jacob Helwig ja...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:42:54 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
One problem
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 18:50 -0700, Jacob Helwig wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:42:54 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
One problem people producing modules that make use of stages are hitting is
that it's difficult to create something reusable that
On 10 June 2011 09:06, Brice Figureau brice-pup...@daysofwonder.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 18:50 -0700, Jacob Helwig wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:42:54 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
One problem people producing modules that make use
Puppet already has stage[ Main ] which is the only
stage it needs to define. All other stages
can be defined relative to main and each other, and should
be a matter of convention. So I think it would be more
fruitful to talk about the purpose of stages, along with
their proposed names.
For
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Jacob Helwig ja...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:42:54 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
One problem people producing modules that make use of stages are hitting
is
that it's difficult to create
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Vagn Scott vagnsc...@gmail.com wrote:
Puppet already has stage[ Main ] which is the only
stage it needs to define. All other stages
can be defined relative to main and each other, and should
be a matter of convention.
This is true, but only if you don't
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Nigel Kersten ni...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
One problem people producing modules that make use of stages are hitting is
that it's difficult to create something reusable that integrates seamlessly
into existing setups.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Dan Bode d...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Nigel Kersten ni...@puppetlabs.comwrote:
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
One problem people producing modules that make use of stages are hitting
is that it's difficult to
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Nigel Kersten ni...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Jacob Helwig ja...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:42:54 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
One problem people producing modules
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:42:54 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
One problem people producing modules that make use of stages are hitting is
that it's difficult to create something reusable that integrates seamlessly
into existing setups.
This feature
A while back I wrote down all the puppet patterns
I could think of, and this was one of them.
I named it Cradle To Grave, but probably that's not
appropriate. However, I was only focusing on
puppet runs at the time, so that name popped into my head.
It is an instance of the more general pattern
I prefer having a small number of predefined stages in puppet.
This makes it easier to share modules which use stages.
My suggestion:
- a small number of stages is easier to remeber
- a samll numer of possibilities makes people think in advance in which
stage they need to put their module
On 10 June 2011 02:50, Jacob Helwig ja...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:42:54 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
One problem people producing modules that make use of stages are hitting
is
that it's difficult to create something
16 matches
Mail list logo
