/puppet.com/docs/puppet/6.4/modules_fundamentals.html#files-in-modules>
>
> On Thursday, May 23, 2019 at 10:13:38 PM UTC+2, Chris Phillips wrote:
> I am using Puppet v5.5.13 and am receiving the following error. Any help
> would be appreciated.
>
> Error: /Stage[main]/Profiles::Base/Fil
I am using Puppet v5.5.13 and am receiving the following error. Any help
would be appreciated.
*Error: /Stage[main]/Profiles::Base/File[/etc/bashrc]: Could not evaluate:
Could not retrieve file metadata for puppet:///files/etcbashrc: Error 500
on SERVER: Server Error: Not authorized to call
Howdy,
I've been getting this issue for about a month in dashboard. All our
nodes poll on a cronjob between 00:00 and 01:00 daily, but one node
has been getting this as a failed task for a while, with the yaml
files building up on the server. Outside of this one cronjob, other
puppet runs on the
On 10 October 2011 13:05, Jonathan Gazeley
jonathan.gaze...@bristol.ac.ukwrote:
On 08/10/11 21:22, Chris Phillips wrote:
What better way to monitor the puppet runs than by executing that run as
part of the check?
I assume your Nagios plugin execution timeout must be insanely long
My take on it is to run it from our nagios server. What better way to
monitor the puppet runs than by executing that run as part of the check?
retry intervals also help push changes out much quicker if they could take
multiple runs etc.
We also run a single daily cron job.
Chris
On 8 October
Our approach is to combine the monitoring and the execution. Totally ditch
the puppet client service and use nagios to run a check_puppet script
which does the puppet run and reports the exit codes. This also covers
things like having a defined retry interval, so if puppet runs and there are
no
This doesn't seem to have been done yet any progress? I'd like to look
at a 2.7.2 upgrade fairly soon and there seems no properly consistent way to
get the RPM's for this.
Thanks
Chris
On 15 July 2011 21:35, Michael Stahnke stah...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
I'd like to reorganize
On 14 July 2011 15:00, Todd Zullinger t...@pobox.com wrote:
rvlinden wrote:
I used to download the Puppet and Facter RHEL5 rpm packages from
http://people.fedoraproject.org/~tmz/repo/puppet/epel/
but the latest version on that site is puppet 2.6.9 and facter
1.5.9.
Does anyone know
On 5 July 2011 16:26, Chris Phillips ch...@untrepid.com wrote:
On 5 July 2011 14:24, Martin Alfke tux...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/05/2011 03:19 PM, Brian Gallew wrote:
I was seeing the behavior on my Solaris boxes when running Puppet under
SMF. The issue, in my case, was that I was trying
On 11 July 2011 14:54, Dominic Cleal dcl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/07/11 09:18, Chris Phillips wrote:
Coming into work this morning I've seen a bunch of func processes have
stopped and puppet is doing nothing at all about it, despite a manifest
advising something else:
Manifest says
Hi,
I was just searching for all systems where selinux is true on Dashboard
and firstly I got no results, despite there being some (any clues?) but that
search also seems to have resurrected some nodes I deleted a few weeks ago.
7 systems instantly appeared under Never reported. I just deleted
Hi,
I've a puppet module running which ensures the puppet service is not running
and not starting on boot. A few times a few different nodes have become
stuck, apparently always thinking that the service is running when it is
not. The following below excerpt just goes round and round run after
I wasn't aware of that layout of the syntax, that's a really interesting way
of writing it. The OP would seem to want blocks added to this though. This
is all very reminiscent of Stages though, so surely if there IS a solution
that satisfies the original need it would be an adjustment to stages.
.
Thanks
Chris
On 5 July 2011 10:42, Ken Barber k...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
What does your service {} block look like? Are you using hasstatus =
true? For example:
service { puppet:
ensure = running,
enable = true,
hasstatus = true,
}
ken.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Chris Phillips
On 5 July 2011 14:24, Martin Alfke tux...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/05/2011 03:19 PM, Brian Gallew wrote:
I was seeing the behavior on my Solaris boxes when running Puppet under
SMF. The issue, in my case, was that I was trying to work around an SMF
bug. My workaround was to svcadm disable
Well that's odd, I was looking at the exact same issue this morning for
sysctl.conf / oracle stuff.
But why are people writing new facts?? Why not just take a copy of the
original function and simply not run the function that normalizes the
number? It seems very odd to make a more limited version
memsize_raw
end
end
end
Thanks
Chris
On 30 June 2011 13:29, Chris Phillips ch...@untrepid.com wrote:
Well that's odd, I was looking at the exact same issue this morning for
sysctl.conf / oracle stuff.
But why are people writing new facts?? Why not just take a copy
Hi,
I've seen some weird behaviour using extlookup, and wondered if anyone has
seen it too...
Basically it seems that if the $extlookup_* variables are defined in site.pp
then an early stage use of extlookup doesn't see these variables at all, yet
main stage ones do. I added some debug
I would see a principle whereby nodes should not ever be defined within
the manifest code at all. To me the manifests should be written to be very
generic, and then use ENC's to modify their behaviour at a user level.
There is still a lot of inconsistency within Puppet as to how device
specific
Hi,
I'm happily aware of the way that there is no concept of unmanaging
something and when this is in the context of a file ownership or whatever,
then that makes sense. But when this is applied to things like nagios
configuration data the principle seems to come unstuck. Or at least, it
seems so
On 10 Jun 2011 07:52, Jacob Helwig ja...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
Chris Phillips ch...@untrepid.com wrote:
On 10 June 2011 02:50, Jacob Helwig ja...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:42:54 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
One problem
On 10 June 2011 09:06, Brice Figureau brice-pup...@daysofwonder.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 18:50 -0700, Jacob Helwig wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:42:54 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
One problem people producing modules that make use
On 10 June 2011 02:50, Jacob Helwig ja...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:42:54 -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7697
One problem people producing modules that make use of stages are hitting
is
that it's difficult to create something
On 8 June 2011 13:30, Martijn Grendelman mart...@iphion.nl wrote:
Hi,
i want to archive the following:
i define an exported ressource for HostX to be monitored in nagios:
@@nagios_host { $fqdn:
ensure = present,
alias = $hostname,
that generated a list of hostgroups based on that.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Chris Phillips ch...@untrepid.com wrote:
On 8 June 2011 13:30, Martijn Grendelman mart...@iphion.nl wrote:
Hi,
i want to archive the following:
i define an exported ressource for HostX to be monitored
g...@gallew.org wrote:
I solved this in a similar manner. I wrote a custom fact (which
essentially returned /var/lib/puppet/state/classes.txt) and then a custom
function that generated a list of hostgroups based on that.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Chris Phillips ch...@untrepid.com wrote
|
if line =~ /^(.+)::nagios-client/
bp_nagios_hostgroups $1 +
end
}
}
next bp_nagios_hostgroups if bp_nagios_hostgroups
end
nil
end
end
On 8 June 2011 15:18, Chris Phillips ch...@untrepid.com
Sounds like it can't resolve puppet from your DNS.
On 27 May 2011 09:14, Sumith Sudhakaran sumit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
When I am trying update from puppet client, getting error like blow
err: Could not request certificate: getaddrinfo: Name or service not known
Please help to solve the
Hi,
I've successfully hooked up func to use the puppet certs, mostly nicely. I'm
now looking at using func to perform nagios checks (instead of installing
nrpe, which is more pants than func). Here the nagios service runs as the
nagios user, and so func also runs as that user, I thought I was
On 19 May 2011 18:48, Gabriel Filion lelu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm using puppet 0.25.5 and a puppetlast script [1].
[1] : http://humangenomeinfo.com.ar/1.txt/usr/share/puppet/ext/puppetlast
I get a negative checkin time from one node..
UNKNOWN: somenode.fqdn checked in -16 minutes ago
On 16 May 2011 21:05, Chris Phillips ch...@untrepid.com wrote:
On 16 May 2011 20:14, Jonathan Gazeley jonathan.gaze...@bristol.ac.ukwrote:
Hi Chris,
We have configured puppet to manage its own puppet.conf on clients, and to
ensure that puppetd is running on all hosts. However it does
On 15 May 2011 20:27, Matthias Saou
th...@spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net wrote:
Dan Bode d...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
I have an implementation question:
1. Why are you doing the chkconfig exec:
exec { chkconfig ${title} on:
notify =
On 16 May 2011 20:14, Jonathan Gazeley jonathan.gaze...@bristol.ac.ukwrote:
Hi Chris,
We have configured puppet to manage its own puppet.conf on clients, and to
ensure that puppetd is running on all hosts. However it does not manage
puppet.conf on the puppetmaster, so if we accidentally mess
Howdy,
I've just built a VM where the system clock was 2 hours off. Part of the
puppet manifest is to get NTP going, so the system itself takes care of
itself OK. However I just noticed on Dashboard that the report listed for
the build phase was also two hours off. As such I'm given to assume
On 13 May 2011 18:46, Patrick kc7...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 8:36 AM, Chris Phillips wrote:
Why would you ever want to trust a time stamp from the client instead of
just using your own time as you receive the report?
In my case, when I run the import rake task, it imports
Hi,
I've got a 2.6.7 server and client setup running pretty nicely in a single
site on a few rhel5 and 6 boxes, and today branched out with a RHEL4 node on
a remote site. This was installing 2.6.7 (and facter 1.5.8) from source due
to the lack of el4 rpms (el5's from yum.puppetlabs.com on all
On 5 May 2011 14:04, jcbollinger john.bollin...@stjude.org wrote:
On May 3, 3:56 pm, Chris Phillips ch...@untrepid.com wrote:
Hi,
I don't know if I'm just not getting it, but I'm struggling to find
the way to elegantly disable a class in its entirety. I am aware of
the foo::disabled
On 5 May 2011 14:52, Felix Frank felix.fr...@alumni.tu-berlin.de wrote:
Sort of funky, I like it!
First and last time for everything!
It may work, but $exclude_classes should not be a vairable, but a
parameter to your define instead.
This way, you can override the include_class in a
On 5 May 2011 17:22, Nan Liu n...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Chris Phillips ch...@untrepid.com wrote:
On 5 May 2011 14:04, jcbollinger john.bollin...@stjude.org wrote:
On May 3, 3:56 pm, Chris Phillips ch...@untrepid.com wrote:
Hi,
I don't know
Howdy,
Can someone enlighten me as to how I can disable a service *IF* it is
installed? I want to ensure rsyslog is installed and running, which requires
syslogd to not be running, but the only way I can see to enforce this in
Puppet is to remove the sysklogd package, which I'd rather not do, I'd
Hi,
I don't know if I'm just not getting it, but I'm struggling to find
the way to elegantly disable a class in its entirety. I am aware of
the foo::disabled conventions, but these are about the disabling of
the end service defined by the class, not the class itself. I'm
looking to have an most
41 matches
Mail list logo
