com/theforeman/puppet-foreman_proxy/blob/master/manifests/init.pp
the $dns_realm parameter isn't exposed for configuration - it's only used
within params.pp to set $dns_tsig_principal (which *is* available in
init.pp). Feel free to submit a bug or even send a patch if you feel that
behaviour is wrong :)
create_resources. We get this question a lot on the
Foreman mailing list, so we have a wiki page detailing some examples. See
http://projects.theforeman.org/projects/foreman/wiki/Instantiate_Puppet_resources
Hope that helps!
Greg
--
Greg Sutcliffe
IRC: gwmngilfen
--
You received this message be
On 13 October 2015 at 15:54, UK_beginner wrote:
> I'm wanting to make some changes to the conditions used in building the
> dashboard lists - is it possible to just edit the erb files in
> app/views/dashboard?
>
> I've tried editing one of the conditions in the
On 16 October 2013 11:48, Steve Wray stevedw...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, I'm using this repository
deb http://deb.theforeman.org/ precise stable
it looks as if the upgrade didn't make the required changes to the
database, or something like that. I dropped the db and recreated it and the
On 16 October 2013 14:39, Steve Wray stevedw...@gmail.com wrote:
Your response is encouraging, thanks.
I wasn't using sqlite, I was using postgresql. I have about 100 nodes (and
growing) sqlite quickly became unusable.
Ah ok. There are changes to the ENC script (which also registers new
Is this puppet3? As I recall, in puppet3, the master makes a separate call
to the enc to determine the environment the should authoritatively be in.
Once that's established, it makes a second call to get the classes and
parameters.
Hth,
Greg
On 20 Sep 2013 13:46, pierra mathieu
On 20 Sep 2013 18:05, Greg Sutcliffe greg.sutcli...@gmail.com wrote:
the should authoritatively be in.
Gah, phone keyboard. The *client* should authoritatively...
Sorry
Greg
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To unsubscribe from
On 23 May 2013 22:25, Eric Sorenson eric.soren...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
Quick question for those of you affected by this -- what did you to do to
add the puppetlabs apt repo?
Did you do it through the method described here:
On 24 May 2013 21:55, Eric Sorenson eric.soren...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
Hi Greg, thanks for the info -- I slightly disagree that the docs should
describe manual installation; IMO they should describe supported/official
ways to do things, because anything that's documented gets interpreted as
On 25 November 2012 21:36, Ugo Bellavance u...@lubik.ca wrote:
Ok, but it looks like foreman is not fully puppet-3 compatible up to now. I
think I'll wait for that.
We have all the required changes for puppet-3 compatibility in the
develop branches of foreman and foreman-proxy - hoping to get
On 1 November 2012 17:54, Lucas Vickers lucasvick...@gmail.com wrote:
I am currently using the open source edition so I have no dashboard.
Puppet Dashboard is opensource, so you could use it, but it's being
deprecated (last I heard, anyway). You could also checkout The Foreman,
which will
On 25 September 2012 12:03, Jon Ward jghw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm attempting to use exported resources to dynamically generate an nginx
config file. What I'd like to do if have all my web servers export their
hostname inside a file resource, and have these collected by my loadbalancer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1 here
As a distribution packager, a clear place to put things specific to the
distribution is a big win for me. I've struggled in the past decided
whether to package the clean upstream sources, or to add my own tweaks
as well. To date, I've kept it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu 26 Apr 2012 17:24:17 BST, Brian Carpio wrote:
$subnet = [ 192.168.10.0, 192.168.20.0, 192.168.30.0 ]
$range = [ 192.168.10.115 192.168.10.120 ]
Sounds like you need a Hash here:
$subnets = { '192.168.10.0' = '192.168.10.115 192.168.10.120',
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri 13 Apr 2012 12:01:13 BST, Sans wrote:
I'm not entirely sure but I don't think you can do that with single
server - Puppet is actually for that. Someone please correct me if I'm
wrong. But, as Puppet can maintain itself, all your users can
Hi Josh,
Of course. I'll pastie so as not to spam the list :)
Here's an Arch client - http://pastie.org/2993397
Here's the Debian running puppet master -- trace --debug -
http://pastie.org/2993401
Cheers,
Greg
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On 25 November 2011 12:18, linuxbsdfreak linuxbsdfr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Greg,
There are some problems with SSL and ruby 1.9.2. Please visit the
link below for solving the issue.
http://urgetopunt.com/puppet/2011/09/14/puppet-ruby19.html
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the reply. As I stated in my
Hi all,
I'm having issues with getting a client to request a certificate from
my master when using Ruby 1.9. The error message is:
err: Could not request certificate: SSL_connect returned=1 errno=0
state=SSLv3 read server certificate B: certificate verify failed
I saw earlier messages on this
On Friday, 7 October 2011 15:12:08 UTC+1, Bruno Leon wrote:
sorry for the delay, I did a few tests and found out that the puppet
master does not even go as far a querying the database.
Starting from a clean query log (mysql), there is no sign of
Concat::Fragment (tried small case as well).
Almost a me-too post, I should try to avoid that...
This sounds like the mail I sent on Monday - I can certainly confirm Bruno's
findings for collecting exported custom defines. I get the same error
message, and I'm also using a remote MySQL database (no queueing agent, just
direct access).
Hi all,
I use a number of exported resources, some of which are exported custom
definitions.Since
upgrading to 2.7.5, I've seen an issue which is driving me up the wall
trying to debug it. Hopefully
someone can help :)
Consider the following three snippets of code:
Hi all,
Since upgrading a few test machines from 2.6.7 to 2.7.3, I've noticed
something slightly odd. Every single run reports 6 skipped resources, yet
the reports are empty - they only state the execution time as per usual). On
digging further it seems that the auto-generated Schedule
Hi Trevor,
I'll add my thanks to the pile, this is pretty awesome stuff! I compared the
--graph results with the old concat moule, and this one - impressive
difference :)
As Larry says, the fact that it executes Concat_build on every run is a
stopper for us, since the dependant services get
Hi again,
After an hour or three of hacking, I've managed to add the insync? checks to
both the build and fragment types. It's the first time I've ever really
messed with types and providers, so it's very ugly (and probably has bugs),
however I'm happy to share my patches. Would that be best
Hi,
In my exported resource manifests, if using code like:
File | tag == nagios::target | { notify = Service[nagios3] }
Does that work for you?
Cheers,
Greg
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email
Heya,
I've merged both approaches. First, I dropped the db on my development
server, and then let puppet recreate it. Since I don;t want to lose my
historical data in production, I then dumped and compared the schema's from
the dev (2.6.7) and prod (2.6.2) environments. I then upgraded prod to
On Thursday, March 17, 2011 2:41:06 PM UTC, Felix.Frank wrote:
I call possible bug on this one. I don't see an open issue that sounds
quite like this, so you may want to report this.
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppet/issues/new
Cheers,
Felix
Thanks Felix - nice to know I'm
,
Greg Sutcliffe
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit
28 matches
Mail list logo