Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet symlink

2012-01-03 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 08:32, Len Rugen lenru...@gmail.com wrote: We have a case where we've been requested to create an extra symlink.  The system provides libsomething.so.0.vv.rr and a symlink of libsomething.so.0. We need create a symlink libsomething.so (without the .0).  I'm afraid

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet symlink

2012-01-01 Thread vagn scott
Can you make your symlinks look like this? libsomething.so --- libsomething.so.0 libsomething.so.0 --- libsomething.so.0.vv.rr the base links can change all they want, in that case. --vagn On 12/30/2011 11:32 AM, Len Rugen wrote: We have a case where we've been requested to create an extra

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet symlink

2011-12-31 Thread Shawn
So I would use puppet to create the symlink or in your cause looks like you are doing this via RPM?? Then I would use puppet to create a cron to check if the symlink is still valid and if not create it, set this to run after your scheduled maintenance time. On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Len

[Puppet Users] Puppet symlink

2011-12-30 Thread Len Rugen
We have a case where we've been requested to create an extra symlink. The system provides libsomething.so.0.vv.rr and a symlink of libsomething.so.0. We need create a symlink libsomething.so (without the .0). I'm afraid maintenance may change the base file and break the puppeted symlink. Can