On Dec 10, 12:20 am, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
On Dec 8, 1:07 pm, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
I've found some problems due to the extremely random ordering puppet does.
It is necessary for some of these items to all happen together, with no
other random
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 22:20, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
On Dec 8, 1:07 pm, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
I've found some problems due to the extremely random ordering puppet does.
It is necessary for some of these items to all happen together, with no
other random
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:33:37AM -0800, Daniel Pittman wrote:
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 22:20, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
On Dec 8, 1:07 pm, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
I've found some problems due to the extremely random ordering puppet
does. It is necessary for
It sounds like he wants to not only assue that foo happens before bar,
but that nothing happens between foo and bar. I think the only way to
ensure that is to use stages, and have a separate stage for the two
items that need to be executed together.
On Dec 8, 1:58 pm, Jacob Helwig
On Dec 8, 1:07 pm, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
I've found some problems due to the extremely random ordering puppet does.
It is necessary for some of these items to all happen together, with no other
random resources executed in between.
That's rather unusual. I'll discuss
