I thing 3.10 will be stable in a few months, so there is no need to do a
backport.
Yes, I look at the patch, it's not small, and touch in mutiple
netfilter/ipstack files
Better to wait.
(I think rhel7 should be release for this summer, so it should be ok pour
proxmox 3.3 :)
BTW,after
Hi all,
Yesterday I might have discovered a bug in either Debian or the new
KVM-1.7.
Howto reproduce:
1) Install Debian Wheezy from install media. For demonstration purpose
stick to the bare minimum.
2) Choose use entire disk using LVM. Accept suggested layout from the
installer
3) After
BTW,after firewall (not soon ;) , I would like to work on dhcp server
implementation.
great!
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
are you sure that is not a debian lvm bug (as it's the unstable repo) ?
I have tested debian kernel until 3.12 (wheezy-backport), withtout boot problem.
- Mail original -
De: Michael Rasmussen m...@datanom.net
À: pve-devel pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
Envoyé: Mercredi 12 Mars 2014
My submission was rejected previously because I was not a member of
pve-devel mailing list. I added myself to this list and I'm now
re-submitting my patches.
From 753d826597851ef8bd55b7359ff7ee1c5b579920 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Allen ca.al...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 23:56:02
Hi Chris,
I am working on a refactor of ZFS Plugin which will decouple specific LUN
implementations from the driver, by providing a single interface for LUN
implementation by means of invoking an external script/program/binary. As
such, I will try to review your patches and incorporate what is
