On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 8:10 AM Dietmar Maurer wrote:
>
> I thought we all agreed that swap does not make sense on
> high memory system?
Very true.
I'd still suggest - as I did for many years on the forums - to install
zram. This can be done automatically and then you have some swap,
compressed
I thought we all agreed that swap does not make sense on
high memory system?
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 07:43:41PM +0200, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> >
> > wouldn't it make more sense to create a swap partition on all boot vdevs
> > instead? if you need swap, this is very cumbersome to do after
>
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 07:43:41PM +0200, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 12:41:57PM +0200, Stoiko Ivanov wrote:
> > I would propose to disable the default creation of a swap-zvol if installing
> > with zfs on root currently, since it introduces deadlocks in some
> >
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 12:41:57PM +0200, Stoiko Ivanov wrote:
> I would propose to disable the default creation of a swap-zvol if installing
> with zfs on root currently, since it introduces deadlocks in some
> circumstances.
>
> Should a solution be implemented, we can revert the changes.
>
>
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 3:53 PM Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> Looks good to me, I'll let it still ripe a bit on the mailing list though,
> for other possible commenters :-)
Great!
--
With kind regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Andreas Steinel
M.Sc. Visual Computing
M.Sc. Informatik
On 10/1/18 12:41 PM, Stoiko Ivanov wrote:
> I would propose to disable the default creation of a swap-zvol if installing
> with zfs on root currently, since it introduces deadlocks in some
> circumstances.
>
> Should a solution be implemented, we can revert the changes.
>
> This patchset
I would propose to disable the default creation of a swap-zvol if installing
with zfs on root currently, since it introduces deadlocks in some circumstances.
Should a solution be implemented, we can revert the changes.
This patchset contains 4 changes:
* disabling the creation of a zvol for swap
