Re: [pve-devel] Gitlab-ci

2019-09-02 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
On 9/2/19 2:33 PM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: >> I'm curious, do you use some kind of email scripts, special email client, to >> manage current workflow ? >> (Sometime I'm lost myself with my patches ;) > most of the actively reviewing people use either (neo)mutt or some > variant of notmuch, but

Re: [pve-devel] Gitlab-ci

2019-09-02 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On August 27, 2019 11:24 am, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: > Hi, > > I think 1 benefit of gitlab,github,... is the tracking of merge request. IMHO this is a big downside of Github and Gitlab - cleanly checking out an older iteration of a PR/MR is very cumbersome (and wasn't even really possible

Re: [pve-devel] Gitlab-ci

2019-08-27 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
workflow ? (Sometime I'm lost myself with my patches ;) - Mail original - De: "Thomas Lamprecht" À: "pve-devel" , "Kamil Trzciński" Envoyé: Lundi 26 Août 2019 19:47:56 Objet: Re: [pve-devel] Gitlab-ci On 26.08.19 12:43, Kamil Trzciński wrote: > Did you thi

Re: [pve-devel] Gitlab-ci

2019-08-26 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
On 26.08.19 12:43, Kamil Trzciński wrote: > Did you think about using GitLab to at least to host all sources? For now that won't happen soon. > > I think that using Merge Requests workflow could actually be better and > easier to contribute to > than current mailing list. > IMO this depends

Re: [pve-devel] Gitlab-ci

2019-08-26 Thread Kamil Trzciński
Did you think about using GitLab to at least to host all sources? I think that using Merge Requests workflow could actually be better and easier to contribute to than current mailing list. On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:53 AM Rene Jochum wrote: > On 2018-04-17 10:27, Dietmar Maurer wrote: > > I

Re: [pve-devel] Gitlab-ci

2018-04-17 Thread Rene Jochum
On 2018-04-17 10:27, Dietmar Maurer wrote: > I personally think this adds much overhead and does not really help > developing software. > Ok. ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com

Re: [pve-devel] Gitlab-ci

2018-04-17 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> I've made some Dockerfiles for PVE (easy to add more for PMG). These > don't require the Docker HUB - so it will be able to build them > even when the hub goes down. > > https://git.lxch.eu/git/pve-dockerfiles > > Is that something Proxmox is interested in? If yes, I'll continue my >

Re: [pve-devel] Gitlab-ci

2018-04-16 Thread Andreas Steinel
Nicely done! I love gitlab :-D On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:50 PM, Rene Jochum wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi! > > I've been working on Gitlab CI for Proxmox. In a dockerized environment > I'm now able to build the current 4.15 pve-kernel for

[pve-devel] Gitlab-ci

2018-04-16 Thread Rene Jochum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi! I've been working on Gitlab CI for Proxmox. In a dockerized environment I'm now able to build the current 4.15 pve-kernel for Debian Buster and Stretch. The Stretch build: https://git.lxch.eu/git/pve-kernel/-/jobs/43