Re: [pve-devel] Google patch - fix a critical fail in Linux kernel for TCP protocol

On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 08:08:27 +0200 (CEST) Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: > >>Ok, but i guess that if we have several VMs into a Server, the problem be > >>multiplied > I'm not sure, because each vm have control of his own tcp congestion. > > (if it's bridged, the host

Re: [pve-devel] Google patch - fix a critical fail in Linux kernel for TCP protocol

>>Ok, but i guess that if we have several VMs into a Server, the problem be >>multiplied I'm not sure, because each vm have control of his own tcp congestion. (if it's bridged, the host shouldn't do nothing) - Mail original - De: "Cesar Peschiera" À: "pve-devel"

Re: [pve-devel] Google patch - fix a critical fail in Linux kernel for TCP protocol

@Alexandre DERUMIER: I'm not sure, because each vm have control of his own tcp congestion. (if it's bridged, the host shouldn't do nothing) Ohh, ok, it isn't a great problem (i use KVM VM). Many thanks for the clarification. And please let me to do a question: Is the same for conatiners (LCX

Re: [pve-devel] Google patch - fix a critical fail in Linux kernel for TCP protocol

This is not a critical bug it merely affects network performance. Ok, but i guess that if we have several VMs into a Server, the problem be multiplied ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com

Re: [pve-devel] Google patch - fix a critical fail in Linux kernel for TCP protocol

On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 01:24:36 -0400 "Cesar Peschiera" wrote: > > My Question: > What will be the policy of PVE about of this? > This is not a critical bug it merely affects network performance. -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael