Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH 1/4] Add CT suspend/resume support via PVE2 API

2014-10-05 Thread Daniel Hunsaker
I know I'd like to try it. The potential issue is when migrating between nodes with different kernel versions/modules/configurations. It would probably be useful to detect those cases (as best we can), and either issue a warning, or automatically switch to an offline migration, shutting down and

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH 1/4] Add CT suspend/resume support via PVE2 API

2014-10-05 Thread Dietmar Maurer
I don't really understand what you talk about. If you suspend to disk, you also need/should transfer that state when you migrate the VM. This is unrelated to online migration. Sure, this can fails, but that should be handled by vzctl chkpnt/restore internally. > I know I'd like to try it.  The

[pve-devel] Roadmap

2014-10-05 Thread Michael Rasmussen
Hi all, I would also suggest adding ploop support to openvz as part of the roadmap since ploop will give real live migration to CT's, improve backup performance, add snapshot feature, and add support for thin provisioned CT's. -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michae

Re: [pve-devel] Roadmap

2014-10-05 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> I would also suggest adding ploop support to openvz as part of the roadmap > since ploop will give real live migration to CT's, improve backup performance, > add snapshot feature, and add support for thin provisioned CT's. I will not add that until it is 100% sure that OpenVZ team will support t

Re: [pve-devel] Roadmap

2014-10-05 Thread Michael Rasmussen
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 12:45:28 + Dietmar Maurer wrote: > > I will not add that until it is 100% sure that OpenVZ team will support that > for newer 3.X kernels. > Where do you get this information? I have not seeing anything on openvz.org indicating ploop should not be supported on 3.1x kerne

Re: [pve-devel] Roadmap

2014-10-05 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> > I will not add that until it is 100% sure that OpenVZ team will support > > that for > newer 3.X kernels. > > > Where do you get this information? I have not seeing anything on openvz.org > indicating ploop should not be supported on 3.1x kernels. There is no information so far (that is why I

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH 1/4] Add CT suspend/resume support via PVE2 API

2014-10-05 Thread Daniel Hunsaker
It would simply fail, and not necessarily in a way that the reason makes sense to the user. But that answers my question on how to handle such scenarios. KVM doesn't have the same issue, since the entire system is virtualized in that case. So it may not be obvious why CT migrations are failing,