/etc/cron.daily/pve:
user config - ignore duplicate vmid '101' in pool 'test'
Apparently the previous VM having that ID was also member of the same
pool so could it be that when a VM is destroyed it is not removed from
the pool?
If so, this is a bug. Are you able to reproduce it?
Many feature are not implemented in OVS (multicast snooping/querier,
connection
tracking,
limited bond modes, iptables, ...), so why is OVS far superior?
I would prefer to have missing bits implemented with linux bridge code.
According to Alexandre's post much of this is coming
Added a vzdump.conf option to controll gzip compression.
When 'pigz' (defaults to 0) is 0, pigz support is enabled.
When the pigz option equals 1 pigz uses #cores/2 threads,
else it spawns N threads. To use it select gzip in the web
interface and set the aproppriate option in /etc/vzdump.conf
What is your opinion to this suggestion?
Can we implement that reliable?
Second. If the above is implemented then in my opinion using
openvswitch is far superior to Linux Bridge/Bond and gives greater
flexibility while at the same time is more logical and simple in use in
which case I
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:17:58 +0200 (CEST)
Dietmar Maurer diet...@proxmox.com wrote:
Can we implement that reliable?
I am positive. I guess the same applies to Linux bridge based vlans. I
am willing to give it a try.
I still prefer linux bridge, because it works without additional
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:09:07 +0200 (CEST)
Dietmar Maurer diet...@proxmox.com wrote:
If so, this is a bug. Are you able to reproduce it?
I will try to replicate it this evening. It could very well be a bug
from a previous release which I first stumble upon now.
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael
since kernel 3.10, it's possible to tag vlan by port on linux bridge too.
I had sent patches last year.
Maybe can I have a look with kernel 3.19,to see if it's still working fine ?
Yes, please. This would simplify our setup.
superior feature of ovs will be dpdk and vhost-user
Maybe better adopt nftables in PVE 4.0? It works on all network layers
of Linux and should be mature enough in 4.0.x kernels.
I'm not sure that nftables is already stable. (last time I checked (6month ago)
it was missing a lot of things).
But yes, I'm still looking at it.
but having an
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 18:14:07 +0200 (CEST)
Dietmar Maurer diet...@proxmox.com wrote:
really? i.e. can we use iptables with ovs?
In 2.4 something similar are implemented:
http://openvswitch.org/support/ovscon2014/17/1030-conntrack_nat.pdf
Most standard linux bond modes are missing? And I
but having an openvswitch openflow native implementation, could be great too.
Oh, you want to implement it with openflow? Would be quite interesting to
compare firewall performance (openflow vs. iptables) ...
___
pve-devel mailing list
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 19:06:52 +0200
Michael Rasmussen m...@datanom.net wrote:
balance-slb ~≃ balance-tlb (mode 5)
active-backup = active-backup (mode 1)
balance-tcp ~= 802.3ad (mode 4)
What more modes do you miss?
Forgot to mention I have made an example available on the wiki using
bond
really? i.e. can we use iptables with ovs?
In 2.4 something similar are implemented:
http://openvswitch.org/support/ovscon2014/17/1030-conntrack_nat.pdf
That is just an interface to the conntrack module - not really related
to iptables? We need iptables for our firewall implementation.
IMHO ovs is superior for two reasons:
1) vlans are linked to ports and not to bridges
2) it more closely resembles the physical world which means simpler to
grasp
since kernel 3.10, it's possible to tag vlan by port on linux bridge too.
I had sent patches last year.
Maybe can I have a look with
Forgot to mention I have made an example available on the wiki using
bond + balance-slb which imitates the default setup by the proxmox
installer:
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Open_vSwitch#Example_3:_Bond_.2B_Bridge_.2B_Internal_Ports_.2B_Untagged_traffic_.2B_No_LACP
Thanks.
I don't have any objection. (now that everybody will use a recent kernel, it
should work fine).
But maybe wait for ovs 2.4 (should come very soon)
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/announce/2015-June/74.html
- Native Linux kernel STT support
- Geneve tunneling
- DPDK
Hi all,
I have installed a proxmox 4.0 to test openvswitch and IMHO the current
network GUI config is not suited for the task since every time you need
to create or delete an OVSint Port a reboot of the node is required. I
will therefore propose a change in the GUI which allows creating or
---
www/manager5/data/ObjectStore.js | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/www/manager5/data/ObjectStore.js b/www/manager5/data/ObjectStore.js
index 03d0c7a..935f922 100644
--- a/www/manager5/data/ObjectStore.js
+++ b/www/manager5/data/ObjectStore.js
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+/* This
getRoot() semantics changed with ExtJS5.
To avoid further annoyances when ExtJS6 is around the corner, replace the call
to this private method, set rootProperty in the ObjectStore call,
and use the value of rootProperty to filter out the content of the server
answer.
---
在 2015年7月22日，下午4:26，Alexandre DERUMIER aderum...@odiso.com 写道：
Having bonding and vlan setup in installer could be a big improvement too !
this will be great! ___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
Hi all,
Yesterday I created a VM which was assigned an ID that was reused from
a previous VM (the algorithm in proxmox). I added this new VM to a pool
and this morning I received this mail from the cron.daily.
/etc/cron.daily/pve:
user config - ignore duplicate vmid '101' in pool 'test'
applied, thanks!
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
applied, thanks!
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
just found this:
http://openvswitch.org/support/ovscon2014/17/1030-conntrack_nat.pdf
I'll try to look at this in the next months. (ovs firewall without
iptables/bridge trick)
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
applied, thanks!
On July 22, 2015 at 10:37 AM Emmanuel Kasper e.kas...@proxmox.com wrote:
Hello !
This patch serie fixes the display of options in the Datacenter config panel.
Emmanuel
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
this patch recovers the config form the tarball.
It will nt recover the nework setting if you recover from OVZ
---
src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm | 30 +++-
src/PVE/LXCCreate.pm | 102 +++---
src/PVE/VZDump/ConvertOVZ.pm | 319 +++
this change will provide that it will be possibel to restore LXC and OVZ
dumpfiles over the gui.
---
www/manager/storage/ContentView.js | 4 ++--
www/manager/window/Restore.js | 8
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/www/manager/storage/ContentView.js
applied.
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
I had problems with DRBD 8.4.5 using dedicated NICs in linux-bridge
(NIC-to-NIC) and in mode balance-rr and OVS IntPort for the LAN
communication, and DRBD don't work correctly.
I have not tried DRBD if OVS is configured for the LAN without OVS IntPort,
simply i changed the LAN communication
applied
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
A minority of users requested that feature. So I guess we do not want to
'depend' on pigz.
--- a/debian/control.in
+++ b/debian/control.in
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Version: @VERSION@-@PACKAGERELEASE@
Section: admin
Priority: optional
Architecture: amd64
-Depends: perl (= 5.10.0-19),
22.07.2015 12:42, Alexandre DERUMIER пишет:
just found this:
http://openvswitch.org/support/ovscon2014/17/1030-conntrack_nat.pdf
I'll try to look at this in the next months. (ovs firewall without
iptables/bridge trick)
Maybe better adopt nftables in PVE 4.0? It works on all network layers
31 matches
Mail list logo
