>>Yes, but qcow3 is also non-existent? Or do they simply improve qcow2 now?
yes,qcow3 should be qcow2 V3. I don't think they want to rewrote from strach a
new format, only try to improve current.
It could be fine to bench FVD vs current qcow2 (with metadata preallocation,
and the new lazycou
Many thanks for the link.
> No idea where it went, but the qemu-devel mailing list has the patches for
> FVD:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-01/msg01948.html
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox
> It was never in qemu upstream.
>
> qemu dev prefer to not maintain to much disk format . (FVD seem to be great
> on the paper)
I just wrote a mail to the developer - maybe I will get a reply.
> They prefer to take idea from FVD and push them in the (futur) qcow2 v3
Yes, but qcow3 is also non
It was never in qemu upstream.
qemu dev prefer to not maintain to much disk format . (FVD seem to be great on
the paper)
They prefer to take idea from FVD and push them in the (futur) qcow2 v3
- Mail original -
De: "Dietmar Maurer"
À: pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
Envoyé: Vendredi 7
lsi can't boot on scsi-block for now.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Derumier
---
PVE/QemuServer.pm |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
index 8ee0dac..5d827d3 100644
--- a/PVE/QemuServer.pm
+++ b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
@@ -1012,7
Found some old code at:
https://sites.google.com/site/tangchq/qemu-fvd
From: pve-devel-boun...@pve.proxmox.com
[mailto:pve-devel-boun...@pve.proxmox.com] On Behalf Of Dietmar Maurer
Sent: Freitag, 07. September 2012 17:31
To: pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
Subject: [pve-devel] FVD
Anybody knows wha
No idea where it went, but the qemu-devel mailing list has the patches
for FVD:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-01/msg01948.html
On 09/07/2012 11:31 AM, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> Anybody knows what happened to the FVD code?
>
>
>
> http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/FVD
>
>
>
Anybody knows what happened to the FVD code?
http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/FVD
Is the code still available somewhere?
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>
> But maybe can we use scsi-hd default for lsi when we need to boot?
>
>
> (virtio-scsi + scsi-block no problem)
We can always use that - no problem for me.
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman
bug of qemu 1.2 : lsi + scsi-block don't boot
scsi-hd works fine.
I have sent a message to the qemu mailing list.
"> I'm trying to boot scsi-block device with lsi controller, and it doesn't
boot. (don't find devices).
>
>
> lsi + scsi-block : don't boot
>
> lsi + scsi-hd : boot
>
> virtio-scsi
updated in git
> -Original Message-
> From: pve-devel-boun...@pve.proxmox.com [mailto:pve-devel-
> boun...@pve.proxmox.com] On Behalf Of Alexandre DERUMIER
> Sent: Freitag, 07. September 2012 11:13
> To: pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
> Subject: [pve-devel] libiscsi 1.6.0
>
> Can you bump libi
Can you bump libiscsi to 1.6.0 ?
https://github.com/sahlberg/libiscsi/commit/61488fd38121460f46faac28f81ffcf5caec7b57
I really need
Support > 255 LUNs :-)
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
maybe this new qemu patch can help for scsi tapes?
(But require kernel 3.6 )
- Mail transféré -
De: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
À: "Nicholas A. Bellinger"
Cc: "target-devel" , "lf-virt"
, "kvm-devel"
, "qemu-devel" , "Stefan Hajnoczi"
, "Zhi Yong Wu" , "Anthony
Liguori" , "Paolo Bonzi
also if
> Improved support for passthrough of SCSI tapes and media changers.
so this is with local /dev/sgX. file=/dev/sgx scsi-blk ?
don't work, maybe create a lio target to expose the /dev/sgx to iscsi can work ?
But I don't know if lio is already backported in redhat kernel.
- Mail ori
> Three new SCSI host bus adapter devices are available: am53c974 and dc390
> emulate
>> should we add them (scsihw)?
I think this is for old guest, like win NT4. Not sure we really need them ;)
>>Also, how can we passthrough SCSI tapes?
I don't have hardware to test it But Yes, I have re
15 matches
Mail list logo
