Re: [pve-devel] corosync, multicast problem because of vmbr multicast_snooping enabled

2013-03-10 Thread Michael Rasmussen
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 10:41:53 +0100 (CET) Alexandre DERUMIER aderum...@odiso.com wrote: So, I don't known for HP switchs, but for Cisco switches it seem to break the election of igmp. Some thoughts: 1) You have an aggregation spanning over two switches, I only use one 2) The switch is up

Re: [pve-devel] corosync, multicast problem because of vmbr multicast_snooping enabled

2013-03-10 Thread Dietmar Maurer
here another bug with igmp report from bridge and bonding, if failover occur in bonding, igmp report are not send anymore :/ http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=1c3ac42 89a0e4d60cbd4787b4a91de4a0c785df1 If you find a bug including a patch we can try to

Re: [pve-devel] Count monthly traffic

2013-03-10 Thread Stefan Priebe
do i need to add pve2.4? sub extract_vm_stats Am 10.03.2013 20:00, schrieb Stefan Priebe: Where does this stuff go into rrd? My idea would be to split receive / transmit into a subkey in $d. So: $d-{net0}{netin/out} $d-{net1}{netin/out} ... Stefan Am 09.03.2013 11:04, schrieb Alexandre

Re: [pve-devel] corosync, multicast problem because of vmbr multicast_snooping enabled

2013-03-10 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
If you find a bug including a patch we can try to fix it (by applying the patch)?  yes, sure, I'll try to look at bridge code deeply this week, I don't known what is the version that redhat have backported and if it's easy to include other patches. - Mail original - De: Dietmar

Re: [pve-devel] corosync, multicast problem because of vmbr multicast_snooping enabled

2013-03-10 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
Thank for help Michael 1) Configure your switches to always have numerical lower IP than any hosts on the same vlan Not sure it'll help, as igmp query from linux have 0.0.0.0 address and not real host address. But my switches have lower ip than my proxmox hosts also, cisco doc say: