Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] block-job-complete : retry if block job cannot be complete

2014-11-10 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
OK, it is not possible to implement this, because qemu only allows a single qmp connection. So if we keep a connection open to get events, we would block everything else. Yes, maybe with some kind of proxy daemon qmp command --- qmp proxy daemon-events---qemu process But that mean another

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] block-job-complete : retry if block job cannot be complete

2014-11-10 Thread Dietmar Maurer
OK, it is not possible to implement this, because qemu only allows a single qmp connection. So if we keep a connection open to get events, we would block everything else. Yes, maybe with some kind of proxy daemon qmp command --- qmp proxy daemon-events---qemu process But that

Re: [pve-devel] PVE + Ceph + Ceph fencing?

2014-11-10 Thread Eneko Lacunza
Hi, On 08/11/14 11:02, Dietmar Maurer wrote: SCENARIO: proxmox HA cluster, VM images exclusively on RBD GOAL: use Ceph auth for fencing Currently this can't be done, but I think the following changes would allow it: - Move storage client auth keyring from /etc/pve/priv/ceph to somewhere

[pve-devel] ipv6 multicast filter

2014-11-10 Thread Dietmar Maurer
Below command does not work for me: # ip6tables -A INPUT -m addrtype --dst-type MULTICAST -j DROP ip6tables: No chain/target/match by that name. Any ideas whats wrong? ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com

Re: [pve-devel] ipv6 multicast filter

2014-11-10 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
# ip6tables -A INPUT -m addrtype --dst-type MULTICAST -j DROP ip6tables: No chain/target/match by that name. Any ideas whats wrong? Strange, It's working for me (kernel 3.10) #ip6tables -A INPUT -m addrtype --dst-type MULTICAST -j DROP # ip6tables-save # Generated by ip6tables-save

Re: [pve-devel] ipv6 multicast filter

2014-11-10 Thread Dietmar Maurer
Does not work with 2.6.32. But maybe we can simply use -d ff00::/8 to match ipv6 multicast traffic? -Original Message- From: Alexandre DERUMIER [mailto:aderum...@odiso.com] Sent: Montag, 10. November 2014 11:39 To: Dietmar Maurer Cc: pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com Subject: Re: ipv6

Re: [pve-devel] Maintenance mode

2014-11-10 Thread Michael Rasmussen
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:27:46 +0100 Michael Rasmussen m...@datanom.net wrote: Hi all, Just to let you know. I have started implementing the feature for applying maintenance mode to a node. Right-click on any node will open a context menu which, at the moment, only contains one item:

Re: [pve-devel] Maintenance mode

2014-11-10 Thread Andrew Thrift
Option 4, You could have a drop down box with a default selection of Distribute Evenly then a list of all available nodes. This would allow the user to just click through and have them distribute evenly, OR they could select a specific node. On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Michael Rasmussen

Re: [pve-devel] Maintenance mode

2014-11-10 Thread Daniel Hunsaker
Agree with Andrew on this one. I could also see default migration paths being defined somewhere, such that when a node goes into maintenance mode, VMs are migrated to the preconfigured target node, with a fallback to the user-selected mode (that is, distribute evenly, or distribute to selected

Re: [pve-devel] Maintenance mode

2014-11-10 Thread Dietmar Maurer
Option 4, You could have a drop down box with a default selection of Distribute Evenly then a list of all available nodes. For each VM? ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

Re: [pve-devel] Maintenance mode

2014-11-10 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
Would a shutdown option for VM's make sense? On 11 November 2014 09:32, Michael Rasmussen m...@datanom.net wrote: On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:27:46 +0100 Michael Rasmussen m...@datanom.net wrote: Hi all, Just to let you know. I have started implementing the feature for applying maintenance mode

Re: [pve-devel] Maintenance mode

2014-11-10 Thread Daniel Hunsaker
Would a shutdown option for VM's make sense? I think there would be situations where that would make sense. We have suspend now, too, so it would make sense to add that to the list as well. ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com