don't have problem here,
I have migrate a lot of debian guest (kernel 3.7), and win2012/2008.
I'm runing kernel 3.10 on host.
(I had migration problem previously between amd and xeons host with 2.6.32
kernel)
Alexandre Derumier
Ingénieur système et stockage
Fixe : 03 20 68
don't have problem here,
I have migrate a lot of debian guest (kernel 3.7), and win2012/2008.
I'm runing kernel 3.10 on host.
So the situation is better than expected. Nevertheless, we cannot release
code with reproducible bugs to stable repositories.
So the update from 2.1.2 to 2.1.3
also with kernel 2.6.32, I has problem of migration from opteron 63XX to
opteron 61XX
(qemu 2.1 and qemu 2.2)
- Mail original -
De: datanom.net m...@datanom.net
À: pve-devel pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
Envoyé: Vendredi 30 Janvier 2015 18:07:02
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] new branch for
Am 30.01.2015 um 16:21 schrieb Dietmar Maurer diet...@proxmox.com:
Did you already test 2.1.3 from pvetest?
No i didn't but i can't go back either as all my vms already run 2.2
since weeks. But i don't have old / slow hw...
And live migration works stable for you? Do you live migrate
random failures with live migration and snapshots, mostly on slow/older
hardware.
Could you define slow and older more specific?
I have a reproducable problem on a host with:
AMD Athlon(tm) II Neo N36L Dual-Core Processor
# qm config 102
boot: cdn
bootdisk: ide0
cores: 1
ide0:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:41:10 +0100 (CET)
Dietmar Maurer diet...@proxmox.com wrote:
AMD Athlon(tm) II Neo N36L Dual-Core Processor
AMD Opteron here. No problems.
ide0: test3:vm-102-disk-1,cache=writethrough,size=32G
Is this only happening using ide or is it a general thing?
--
Hi all,
We just updated the pvetest repository and uploaded a lot of latest packages
required to support ZFS on Linux.
Also note that we have downgraded pve-qemu-kvm from 2.2 to 2.1, because live
migration was unstable on some hosts. So please downgrade that package manually
(using and wget
Did you already test 2.1.3 from pvetest?
No i didn't but i can't go back either as all my vms already run 2.2
since weeks. But i don't have old / slow hw...
And live migration works stable for you? Do you live migrate windows guests?
___
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:10:32 +0100 (CET)
Dietmar Maurer diet...@proxmox.com wrote:
random failures with live migration and snapshots, mostly on slow/older
hardware.
Could you define slow and older more specific?
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael at
on stackoverflow i read that vmware and RHEV / oVirt already do this in
clusters.
For mixed clusters, use the lowest available CPU version, so if one
host is Penryn and the other Nehalem, use Penryn on both. If you are
using RHEV or oVirt, this is already built in. VMWare have this called
Hi,
is there any way or has anybody thought about optimizing the cpu flags
in pve automatically?
Currently the default is kvm64 which is more like a very limited set of
cpu flags/features which qemu can software emulate.
For example on a modern intel CPU there is a really big bunch of
ide0: test3:vm-102-disk-1,cache=writethrough,size=32G
Is this only happening using ide or is it a general thing?
Seems a general problem.
But I also have problem with snapshots on total different hardware.
___
pve-devel mailing list
also with kernel 2.6.32, I has problem of migration from opteron 63XX to
opteron 61XX
I use exactly the same hardware in that test cluster.
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
FYI, I create a new branch for pve-qemu-kvm 2.1.3, because 2.2 has bugs in live
migration code.
https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-qemu-kvm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/stable-3.3-fixes
2.1.3 runs stable for us.
- Dietmar
___
pve-devel mailing list
Am 30.01.2015 um 15:56 schrieb Dietmar Maurer:
FYI, I create a new branch for pve-qemu-kvm 2.1.3, because 2.2 has bugs in live
migration code.
https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-qemu-kvm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/stable-3.3-fixes
2.1.3 runs stable for us.
strange - to me 2.1.2 was buggy but
Am 30.01.2015 um 15:56 schrieb Dietmar Maurer:
FYI, I create a new branch for pve-qemu-kvm 2.1.3, because 2.2 has bugs in
live
migration code.
https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-qemu-kvm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/stable-3.3-fixes
2.1.3 runs stable for us.
strange - to me 2.1.2 was
Am 30.01.2015 um 16:10 schrieb Dietmar Maurer:
Am 30.01.2015 um 15:56 schrieb Dietmar Maurer:
FYI, I create a new branch for pve-qemu-kvm 2.1.3, because 2.2 has bugs in
live
migration code.
https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-qemu-kvm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/stable-3.3-fixes
2.1.3 runs stable
Hi,
I'm going to fosdem at brussels tomorrow
https://fosdem.org/2015/schedule/event/leveragingceph/
Loic dachary invite me to talk briefly about the ceph integration in proxmox :)
Sage Weil will be there too,
I'll try to talk with him abour librbd vs krbd performance.
Alexandre
I'm going to fosdem at brussels tomorrow
https://fosdem.org/2015/schedule/event/leveragingceph/
Loic dachary invite me to talk briefly about the ceph integration in proxmox
:)
Sage Weil will be there too,
I'll try to talk with him abour librbd vs krbd performance.
Great!
I'll test it today
works fine, thanks!
- Mail original -
De: aderumier aderum...@odiso.com
À: dietmar diet...@proxmox.com
Cc: pve-devel pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
Envoyé: Jeudi 29 Janvier 2015 08:24:04
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] bump to 0.9 v2
I just updated to 0.9.1, which is
Hi Alexandre,
On 30/01/15 11:16, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to fosdem at brussels tomorrow
https://fosdem.org/2015/schedule/event/leveragingceph/
Loic dachary invite me to talk briefly about the ceph integration in proxmox :)
Sage Weil will be there too,
I'll try to talk with
21 matches
Mail list logo
