I this really a good idea?
On March 19, 2015 at 11:06 AM Alexandre Derumier aderum...@odiso.com wrote:
This patches serie move the iothread global option,
to disk option.
Currently on virtio-blk (virtio-scsi will come in a next patch series).
Now, we have 1 iothread by disk, which
I then tried to add the 2nd node which just hangs:
# pvecm add 10.255.0.10
executed on node2 (not node1)?
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 20:01:34 +0100
Stefan Priebe s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote:
Ports Bound: 0
Should you not see two ports here for a 1-node cluster?
0 and some port 0
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael at rasmussen dot cc
Hi,
i wanted to setup a new proxmox dev cluster of 3 nodes. I already had a
single pve machine i want to extend.
So i used that one as a base.
# pvecm create pve-dev
Restarting pve cluster filesystem: pve-cluster[dcdb] notice: wrote new
cluster config '/etc/cluster/cluster.conf'
.
solved. Ugly switch had a special parameter for jumbo frames *gr*
Stefan
Am 23.03.2015 um 22:25 schrieb Stefan Priebe:
Also tried:
transport=udpu
But it doesn't change anything ;-( same problem. 2nd node does not join
first node already running vms.
Stefan
Am 23.03.2015 um 20:01 schrieb
Also tried:
transport=udpu
But it doesn't change anything ;-( same problem. 2nd node does not join
first node already running vms.
Stefan
Am 23.03.2015 um 20:01 schrieb Stefan Priebe:
Hi,
i wanted to setup a new proxmox dev cluster of 3 nodes. I already had a
single pve machine i want to
Hi Stefan
I had tested in two brands of switches that if i change the jumbo frames
configuration to the max, the switches also accept MTUs of minor values by
part of the servers, so i have as custom always configure the switches at
max value (one less worry for me).
Also, with that
