In future, we can now also add additional mount entries like:
rootfs: local:101/subvol-101-disk-1.raw,size=4
mount0: faststore:101/subvol-101-disk-1.raw,size=1,mp=/mnt/faststore
mount1: slowbigstore:101/subvol-101-disk-1.raw,size=1024,mp=/mnt/slowbigstore
I wonder if we could use something
1) Does the new fix something currently broken?
2) Does the new provide something useful to us which is currently not
available?
I the coreboot case the answers to the above to questions is:
1) No
2) No
OK ;-) Thanks for testing!
___
pve-devel
Setting these doesn't make much sense as the interfaces are
attached to bridges (this is old cruft from VZ venet).
(Hotplugging already leaves them be at their default.)
---
src/lxcnetaddbr | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/lxcnetaddbr b/src/lxcnetaddbr
index
---
PVE/AccessControl.pm | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/PVE/AccessControl.pm b/PVE/AccessControl.pm
index 955e143..bfee816 100644
--- a/PVE/AccessControl.pm
+++ b/PVE/AccessControl.pm
@@ -708,6 +708,7 @@ sub parse_user_config {
userconfig_force_defaults($cfg);
+
---
src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm | 2 +-
src/PVE/LXCCreate.pm | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm b/src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm
index 17cb0a6..93ab537 100644
--- a/src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@
there was the allocation missed
---
src/PVE/LXC.pm | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/src/PVE/LXC.pm b/src/PVE/LXC.pm
index 21f03a4..bf084ba 100644
--- a/src/PVE/LXC.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/LXC.pm
@@ -643,6 +643,7 @@ sub parse_ct_mountpoint {
if ($p =~
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 07:23:53 +0200 (CEST)
Dietmar Maurer diet...@proxmox.com wrote:
I have successfully make a boot rom with coreboot using seabios as
payload;-)
So what is the advantage if that still uses seabios?
I have asked myself the same question;-)
The other possible payloads, as
I wonder if we could use something generic like
hdd0: local:101/subvol-101-disk-1.raw,size=4,mp=/
I prefer 'rootfs' instead, because 'rootfs' has fixed mp '/', and is a required
option.
hdd1: faststore:101/subvol-101-disk-1.raw,size=1,mp=/mnt/faststore
hdd2:
I have successfully make a boot rom with coreboot using seabios as
payload;-)
So what is the advantage if that still uses seabios?
I have asked myself the same question;-)
The other possible payloads, as I see it, will not be sufficient for
proxmox since they all miss iscsi and
Ok.
I'll try to work on mountpoints next week.
- Mail original -
De: dietmar diet...@proxmox.com
À: aderumier aderum...@odiso.com
Cc: pve-devel pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
Envoyé: Vendredi 7 Août 2015 10:40:22
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] use our own format for LXC containers
I wonder if we
if the packet on the opt list is not installed, it will not shown.
---
PVE/API2/APT.pm | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/PVE/API2/APT.pm b/PVE/API2/APT.pm
index 2eac330..b665a5b 100644
--- a/PVE/API2/APT.pm
+++ b/PVE/API2/APT.pm
@@ -536,9 +536,12 @@
---
src/PVE/VZDump/ConvertOVZ.pm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/PVE/VZDump/ConvertOVZ.pm b/src/PVE/VZDump/ConvertOVZ.pm
index 72f1c0d..dedd640 100644
--- a/src/PVE/VZDump/ConvertOVZ.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/VZDump/ConvertOVZ.pm
@@ -304,9 +304,9 @@ sub
I applied a slightly modified patch:
https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-container.git;a=commitdiff;h=ef241384c684dcb1bbd0f537ab1c58e676ddf530
Does that work for you?
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
This is necessary if we use Container because they use subvol.
subvol has no size but a quota.
if return is 0 there is no quota set.
---
PVE/Storage/ZFSPoolPlugin.pm | 16
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/PVE/Storage/ZFSPoolPlugin.pm
---
src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm b/src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm
index 93ab537..8823ae4 100644
--- a/src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm
@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ __PACKAGE__-register_method({
my $code = sub {
I think it should work.
I'll have more time for testing next week, I was very busy this week.
- Mail original -
De: dietmar diet...@proxmox.com
À: aderumier aderum...@odiso.com, pve-devel pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
Envoyé: Vendredi 7 Août 2015 11:47:55
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH]
16 matches
Mail list logo