Re: [pve-devel] training week : students features requests

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: > > - implement a gui/tool to manage multiple clusters > That would be awesome! ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com

Re: [pve-devel] training week : students features requests

I forgot 2 others requests: - add an option to usbX, to allow migration. (2 physical node with same usb device (usb dongle for example) - allow migration to another proxmox cluster (different cluster with different storage, I think it could be done by extending my live storage patches)

Re: [pve-devel] training week : question about HA and service in error

> We were just surprised that the vm stay in error and that we can't start it > manually. > (maybe manual start should reset the HA error ?) This is the default mechanism we copied from rgmanager. The reasoning is that the admin needs to make sure that the VM is really down, and not running

[pve-devel] training week : students features requests

Hi, here some request from students from this training week. (BTW, we don't have found any bug) - add a qm command to import disks from other hypervisors (create vm, volumes, and qemu-img mirror). I think some patches have been sent in the mailing last year but never finished - installer

Re: [pve-devel] training week : question about HA and service in error

>>But I do not really understand why you want such setup? That was just a test during the training. We were just surprised that the vm stay in error and that we can't start it manually. (maybe manual start should reset the HA error ?) BTW, the new gui for HA with priorities is very good !

Re: [pve-devel] training week : question about HA and service in error

> > Is it a bug ? > > What you describe is expected behavior. > > IMHO it makes not much sense to define a > Ha group with only one node ...? Well, you could set max_restart to a very high value, so that it tries until that node is up again. Maybe we can even makes this a special case, and

Re: [pve-devel] training week : question about HA and service in error

> Is it a bug ? What you describe is expected behavior. IMHO it makes not much sense to define a Ha group with only one node ...? ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

[pve-devel] training week : question about HA and service in error

Hi, we are currently testing HA with last proxmox from no subscription repository, and I think we have a bug for a specific case. we defined an HA group with only 1 server : kvmformation1, with restricted. vm106 is in the hagroup and run in kvmformation1. when kvmformation1 is crashing, the