Hi,
On 26/01/15 18:36, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
I usually change it to soft because eventually this kind of problems happen.
You just have to accept that using soft mounts does not guaranty
against data loss.
True, but this prevents the nodes using that NFS share to become unstable.
If
On 26/01/15 18:21, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
I usually change it to soft because eventually this kind of problems happen.
Maybe it would be helpful to be able to set soft mount on GUI storage
configuration, this would help not to forget it ;)
Somebody wants to provide a patch?
Will try to do
Will try to do so, seems a simple enough change for a first contribution.
GUI and API would need to be patched?
The API is already complete:
# pvesh help /storage/local -v
so you need to implement the GUI.
___
pve-devel mailing list
Will try to do so, seems a simple enough change for a first contribution.
Also read:
http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Developer_Documentation
before you start.
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
I usually change it to soft because eventually this kind of problems happen.
Maybe it would be helpful to be able to set soft mount on GUI storage
configuration, this would help not to forget it ;)
On 26/01/15 16:59, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
Is it really expected to mount the nfs with hard
Hi,
today i had some problems with a nfs share used for cdisoimages not
being available anymore to pve.
Somebody else tried to reboot one of the pve nodes but they seem to hang
on shutdown no beeing able to reach the nfs share.
Also some requests to pveapi seem to hang.
Is it really expected
Is it really expected to mount the nfs with hard instead of soft?
You can also set the 'soft' option if you want - that is up to you.
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
Am 26.01.2015 um 16:59 schrieb Dietmar Maurer:
Is it really expected to mount the nfs with hard instead of soft?
You can also set the 'soft' option if you want - that is up to you.
Where or do you mean by edit the PVE code?
Stefan
___
pve-devel
Stefan Priebe s.pri...@profihost.ag hat am 26. Januar 2015 um 19:54
geschrieben:
Am 26.01.2015 um 16:59 schrieb Dietmar Maurer:
Is it really expected to mount the nfs with hard instead of soft?
You can also set the 'soft' option if you want - that is up to you.
Where or do you mean
I usually change it to soft because eventually this kind of problems happen.
Maybe it would be helpful to be able to set soft mount on GUI storage
configuration, this would help not to forget it ;)
Somebody wants to provide a patch?
___
pve-devel
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:06:26 +0100
Eneko Lacunza elacu...@binovo.es wrote:
I usually change it to soft because eventually this kind of problems happen.
You just have to accept that using soft mounts does not guaranty
against data loss.
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my public GnuPG
11 matches
Mail list logo