Re: [pve-devel] qemu-server:add support for hugetlbfs

2014-12-21 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
-devel] qemu-server:add support for hugetlbfs This add support for manually defined hugepages, which can be faster than transparent hugepages for some workload like databases 1.) Is there some edivence that it is faster (under realistic workload)? 2.) Where do we free/dealloc those hugepages

Re: [pve-devel] qemu-server:add support for hugetlbfs

2014-12-21 Thread Dietmar Maurer
On December 21, 2014 at 1:23 PM Alexandre DERUMIER aderum...@odiso.com wrote: 1.) Is there some edivence that it is faster (under realistic workload)? I known that transparent hugepage can be really a problem with a lot of database (oracle,mysql,redis,..) I never bench it myself, but

Re: [pve-devel] qemu-server:add support for hugetlbfs

2014-12-21 Thread Cesar Peschiera
@pve.proxmox.com Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014 9:23 AM Subject: Re: [pve-devel] qemu-server:add support for hugetlbfs 1.) Is there some edivence that it is faster (under realistic workload)? I known that transparent hugepage can be really a problem with a lot of database (oracle,mysql,redis,..) I

Re: [pve-devel] qemu-server:add support for hugetlbfs

2014-12-20 Thread Dietmar Maurer
This add support for manually defined hugepages, which can be faster than transparent hugepages for some workload like databases 1.) Is there some edivence that it is faster (under realistic workload)? 2.) Where do we free/dealloc those hugepages? Are the associated with the KVM process

[pve-devel] qemu-server:add support for hugetlbfs

2014-12-18 Thread Alexandre Derumier
This add support for manually defined hugepages, which can be faster than transparent hugepages for some workload like databases ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel