[pve-devel] Live migration should check for host compatibility?

2015-03-21 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
Hi all, Martin has kindly redirected me to the list as the appropriate place to ask / discuss this: I noticed that, even though a kvm guest is set to CPU type 'host', the live migration feature does not check for compatibility with the destination host. E.g. Moving from a Opteron 6366 to an

Re: [pve-devel] criu for lxc news on criu.org

2015-03-29 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
Am 29.03.2015 um 20:18 schrieb Daniel Hunsaker danhunsa...@gmail.com: There's Gentoo, which seemed pretty solid and stable while I was using it, but I haven't looked at their kernels lately to see how they are faring... But being a rolling-release OS, would that be at all suitable? Martin

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] qemu-img convert : use default cache=unsafe instead writeback

2016-08-01 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
> Am 01.08.2016 um 09:44 schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER : > >>> Answering myself, 'close' does not issue flush/fsync. > > close send a flush > > It's was introduce by this commit > > [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] qemu-img: let 'qemu-img convert' flush data >

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] qemu-img convert : use default cache=unsafe instead writeback

2016-08-01 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
> Am 01.08.2016 um 09:26 schrieb Dominik Csapak : > > On 08/01/2016 08:51 AM, Alexandre Derumier wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Derumier >> --- >> PVE/QemuServer.pm | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git

Re: [pve-devel] Suggest VirtIO drivers as default when creating a Linux VM

2016-07-19 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
> Am 19.07.2016 um 13:00 schrieb Emmanuel Kasper : > > Hi > > This patch series adds capabilities to store Qemu Wizard Defaults, and > use these capabilities > to set virtio by default for Linux machines. Sounds like a really good idea. But why not go a step further and

Re: [pve-devel] MAC address generation

2016-07-08 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
> Am 07.07.2016 um 17:26 schrieb Andreas Steinel : > > Hi, > > I currently only have one big 3.4 install (>150 VMs), on which I compared > the generated MACs and found out that they are completely random. Are there > plans or probably is there already an implementation to

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] rbdplugin : disable debug_ms to increase performance

2016-11-06 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
> Am 05.11.2016 um 15:43 schrieb Alexandre Derumier : > > This increase iops and decrease latencies by around 30% Alexandre, apart from debug_ms = 0/0, what are the currently suggested defaults for these performance tweaks? ___

[pve-devel] HW driver / DKMS

2017-01-13 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
Hi there, Can I use the dkms infrastructure with proxmox kernels? I ask because there is a newer driver for current Microsemi / Adaptec RAID adapters: http://download.adaptec.com/raid/aac/linux/aacraid-linux-src-1.2.1-52011.tgz (or for dkms)

Re: [pve-devel] HW driver / DKMS

2017-01-14 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
> Am 14.01.2017 um 10:29 schrieb Dmitry Petuhov : > > Yes, you can. Just install pve-headers package corresponding to your running > kernel. Also you will have to manually install headers on every kernel update. > Or you can just wait for next PVE kernel release. It

Re: [pve-devel] upgrade for openvswitch takes node offline?

2016-12-02 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
> Am 02.12.2016 um 20:04 schrieb Michael Rasmussen <m...@datanom.net>: > > On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 19:54:20 +0100 > Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH <serv...@waschbuesch.it> wrote: > >> >> Any ideas how that could be avoided? Like, at all. :-/ >> > Coul

[pve-devel] upgrade for openvswitch takes node offline?

2016-12-02 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
Hi all, I just upgraded a current node running PVE 4.3 to the latest updates available on the enterprise repo. Things work ok until apt gets to: Preparing to unpack .../proxmox-ve_4.3-72_all.deb ... Unpacking proxmox-ve (4.3-72) over (4.3-71) ... Preparing to unpack

[pve-devel] VM config: User Interface <-> Online Help mismatch

2017-01-05 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
Hi all, I just stumbled across the following: When configuring memory for a VM, you can choose between the options 'Use fixed size memory' and 'Automatically allocate memory within this range'. The online help explains the ballooning feature quite nicely, but there is a mismatch: Under the

Re: [pve-devel] VM config: User Interface <-> Online Help mismatch

2017-01-06 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
Hi Dietmar, > Am 06.01.2017 um 12:39 schrieb Dietmar Maurer : > >> The online help explains the ballooning feature quite nicely, but there is a >> mismatch: >> Under the 'Use fixed size memory' option, I can set the memory size and there >> is a checkbox 'Ballooning'. >> I

[pve-devel] megaraid interrupts

2017-04-20 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
Hi all, In case this is helpful to anyone else: I just installed PVE 4.4 on a box with a megaraid controller (9261-8i). For some reason, the device's interrupts where not distributed among CPU cores. After digging a little, I found that the version of the megaraid driver that comes with the

[pve-devel] Ceph OSD latency changes

2017-08-14 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
Hi all, In API2/Ceph.pm osd latency information are read from the output of $get_osd_usage sub by running the monitor command 'pg dump'. I don't know if this used to contain the latency information for each osd, but it does not in the current (luminous) tree. I guess the information needs to

Re: [pve-devel] Ceph OSD latency changes

2017-08-14 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
Solved! > Am 14.08.2017 um 22:34 schrieb Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH > <serv...@waschbuesch.it>: > > Be that as it may, the problem I have which lead me to have a look at it is: > in the UI *all* my osds show a latency of 0. > Using the shell, they don't. I was on t

Re: [pve-devel] Ceph OSD latency changes

2017-08-14 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
> Am 14.08.2017 um 20:39 schrieb Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH > <serv...@waschbuesch.it>: > > Hi all, > > In API2/Ceph.pm > > osd latency information are read from the output of $get_osd_usage sub by > running the monitor command 'pg dump'. > I don't know

[pve-devel] AMD EPYC

2017-10-05 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
Hi all, Since several times I read both on this list and on the forum that AMD based servers are rarely used for development / testing, I'd like to offer the following: I just ordered a dual socket EPYC system (Supermicro AS-1123US-TR4 with dual EPYC 7351) and if any of the core developers

Re: [pve-devel] AMD EPYC

2017-10-17 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
: > > Hi, > > yes, sounds interesting. please contact me directly as soon as you can > provide access for testing, > > Martin > > On 05.10.2017 09:56, Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH wrote: >> Hi all, >> Since several times I read both on this list and on the

[pve-devel] [PATCH manager] Reflect changed output for 'ceph pg dump -f json'.

2017-08-23 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
Reflect changed output for 'ceph pg dump -f json'. Signed-off-by: Martin Waschbüsch --- Without this patch, all osds will show a latency of 0. Sadly, that is not true. :-) PVE/API2/Ceph.pm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Re: [pve-devel] AMD EPYC

2017-11-03 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
: > > Hi, > > yes, sounds interesting. please contact me directly as soon as you can > provide access for testing, > > Martin > > On 05.10.2017 09:56, Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH wrote: >> Hi all, >> Since several times I read both on this list and on the

Re: [pve-devel] Updated qemu pkg needed for Meltdown and Spectre?

2018-01-05 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
> Am 05.01.2018 um 11:25 schrieb Fabian Grünbichler > : > > On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 09:08:32PM +0100, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: >> >> Here we go - attached is the relevant patch - extracted from the >> opensuse src.rpm. > > this will most likely not be

Re: [pve-devel] Updated qemu pkg needed for Meltdown and Spectre?

2018-01-06 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
> Am 05.01.2018 um 21:41 schrieb Fabian Grünbichler > <f.gruenbich...@proxmox.com>: > > On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 06:50:33PM +0100, Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH wrote: >> >> AFAIK Meltdown is only affecting Intel (& ARM), but not AMD - see 'Forcing >>

[pve-devel] 'Advanced' checkbox in web gui

2018-08-30 Thread Waschbüsch IT-Services GmbH
Hi there, is there a way to enable the 'Advanced' view by default? I do not, for myself, see any benefit in hiding config options. It only means additional clicks for me. If not, perhaps there could be a flag in datacenter.cfg? Best, Martin Waschbüsch