On 07/22/2013 05:04 AM, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
Does it help if you restart service ' rrdcached' (and maybe 'pve-cluster')?
Working with rrdcached directly, you might gain some traction flushing
the data:
rrdcached -P FLUSH
--
Paul Gray -o)
314
On 07/22/2013 05:11 AM, Paul Gray wrote:
On 07/22/2013 05:04 AM, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
Does it help if you restart service ' rrdcached' (and maybe 'pve-cluster')?
Working with rrdcached directly, you might gain some traction flushing
the data:
rrdcached -P FLUSH
... perhaps
Using the latest release's GUI to create a bridge, I needed to
troubleshoot an issue where the bridge wasn't passing traffic.
It appears to be a bug in the GUI's bridge creation script,
comma-separating the interfaces being added to the bridge.
The GUI bridge creation scripts added this:
On 07/22/2013 06:15 AM, Paul Gray wrote:
Using the latest release's GUI to create a bridge, I needed to
troubleshoot an issue where the bridge wasn't passing traffic.
It appears to be a bug in the GUI's bridge creation script,
comma-separating the interfaces being added to the bridge.
On 20/07/2013 01:25, Fábio Rabelo wrote:
Honestly i hope proxmox will drop openvz support in favour of LXC.
This is a very good idea, by the way !!!
I don't thinks so. Until some month ago LXC had insufficient privilege
separation, and still is quite far from OpenVZ features.
Simone
--
Il 2013-07-22 16:15 Simone Piccardi ha scritto:
On 20/07/2013 01:25, Fábio Rabelo wrote:
Honestly i hope proxmox will drop openvz support in favour of LXC.
This is a very good idea, by the way !!!
I don't thinks so. Until some month ago LXC had insufficient privilege
separation, and still
