* Frank Thommen [191217 22:10]:
> I probably don't understand the question correctly: One has the IP traffic
> to the server/hypervisor, the other has IP traffic for the attached VMs and
> containers. Is there no need for a gateway if the bridge only provisions
> VMs and containers with network
On 17.12.19 21:42, Chris Hofstaedtler | Deduktiva wrote:
* Frank Thommen [191217 20:29]:
(how) can I connect two virtual bridges to the same network (using the same
gateway)?
Our currently-being-built-up PVE server has four Linux network bonds
connecting to two three networks. One is being
* Frank Thommen [191217 20:29]:
> (how) can I connect two virtual bridges to the same network (using the same
> gateway)?
>
> Our currently-being-built-up PVE server has four Linux network bonds
> connecting to two three networks. One is being used for the PVE server
> itself (administration,
Hello,
(how) can I connect two virtual bridges to the same network (using the
same gateway)?
Our currently-being-built-up PVE server has four Linux network bonds
connecting to two three networks. One is being used for the PVE server
itself (administration, web ui ecc), the other three for
--- Begin Message ---
Il 15/12/19 12:51, Frédéric MASSOT ha scritto:
Ben Hutchings answered this about the non transmission of discard by
LVM: "This seems to be incorrect. LVM normally uses dm-table, which
supports discard if the underlying device(s) do".
I do not know what to think. Mdadm,
