e
no evidence so far, this is only speculation.
The IO-Load is constantly around ~25% and the load is rising linear. SSH
and HTTPS are hung. The only possibility to regain access is to reboot
the server.
[0] https://pastebin.com/5GzhfCyJ
On 01/29/2018 01:05 PM, Elias wrote:
> dmesg was full of said l
dmesg was full of said logs. Logins and package updates didn't work either.
The load-average rose in a linear fashion to ~1700, the IO-load was at a
constant ~17 before I rebooted.
Again, this did not affect VM performance.
Since the update to pve-manager/5.1-43/bdb08029 this issue did not
appear
nks,
Elias
[68423.721417] systemd[1]: Starting Journal Service...
[68430.428008] systemd[1]: Started Session 66 of user root.
[68513.966147] systemd[1]: systemd-journald.service: Start operation
timed out. Terminating.
[68604.214629] systemd[1]: systemd-journald.service: State
'stop-final-sigt
-lxc.24858/
Regards,
Elias Werberich
Am 27.06.2017 um 16:48 schrieb Gilberto Nunes:
> This is so sad!
> With LXC my server doesn´t pain to run 2 containers both with 2 G of memory
> ( each one).
> The memory available in my home server is 8 GB..
> When run only containers, the iostat
minimal overhead.
Regards,
Elias Werberich
On June 27, 2017 15:12:04 Dietmar Maurer <diet...@proxmox.com> wrote:
I don't think docker works inside LXC.
On June 27, 2017 at 2:28 PM Gilberto Nunes <gilberto.nune...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi list
I am trying install collabora cod
server providers use an install service in the background if you rent
a server and want to install Proxmox on it. They also use the manual method
which can be found in the Proxmox wiki.
Regards,
Elias Werberich
On June 26, 2017 17:10:48 Gilberto Nunes <gilberto.nune...@gmail.com> wrote
Hi Gilberto,
simply run a Debian Jessie installer script which adds PVE's repositories
and installs all needed packages.
Regards,
Elias Werberich
On June 26, 2017 17:04:58 Gilberto Nunes <gilberto.nune...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi list
Is that possible make a PVE Unattended installati
Hello,
It does not bypass the rules, but you have to keep in mind that
"ip_forward" may be dangerous.
Regards,
Elias Werberich
Am 22.06.2017 um 10:04 schrieb Yannick Palanque:
> Hello,
>
> On my server, it doesn't bypass the rules.
> But you should test yourself and tel
Hello,
thank you, it works.
But it will not bypass any firewall rules?
Regards,
Elias Werberich
Am 21.06.2017 um 21:12 schrieb Yannick Palanque:
> Le 2017-06-21 18:26, Elias Werberich a écrit :
>> Using SNAT instead of MASQUERADE does not solve the problem.
>> In a pve-devel th
'10.0.0.0/24' -i vmbr12 -j CT
--zone 1
post-up iptables -t raw -A PREROUTING -d '10.0.0.0/24' -i vmbr12 -j CT
--zone 1
Using NAT "and" PVE Firewall is not an unusal scenario. It looks like some kind
of "pvefw bug".
Yours sincerely,
Elias Werberich
-
[1]:
https://
sion:
# pveversion
pve-manager/4.4-5/c43015a5 (running kernel: 4.4.35-2-pve)
Cya,
Elias
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
11 matches
Mail list logo