On 03/03/2016 11:14 PM, Ilya Konyakhin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Frank Thommen
> wrote:
What do you mean by "the previous generated 32 bit templates"?
Should additional templates be downloadable
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Frank Thommen <
frank.thom...@uni-heidelberg.de> wrote:
> What do you mean by "the previous generated 32 bit templates"? Should
> additional templates be downloadable somewhere? I couldn't find them on
> linuxcontainers.org
>
Frank, I suggest that Thomas said
> So the reason that there are no 32 bit ones at our template host is
> unknown to me
This simply duplicates building, testing and maintenance
effort on our side. I want to avoid that.
You can still build and use such templates yourselves.
___
Hi,
thanks for the quick answer.
On 03/03/2016 04:11 PM, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
Hi,
no no reason at all, LXC and so we is able to run 32bit Containers fine.
You can use the one provided by lxc (at least those which distro we
support (debian, ubuntu, arch, centos, alpine, suse are the ones
Hi,
no no reason at all, LXC and so we is able to run 32bit Containers fine.
You can use the one provided by lxc (at least those which distro we
support (debian, ubuntu, arch, centos, alpine, suse are the ones if I
did not miss anything) and you normally also should be able to run the
previous
Hello,
is there a reason, why there are no 32bit container templates provided
for PVE 4.x? With PVE 3.x I used the 32bit openvz templates, as I'm
mostly running small services and I want to keep the memory and disk
footprints as small as possible. However for PVE 4.x all offered
templates