Re: [PVE-User] bug in pve kernel

2013-07-22 Thread Simone Piccardi
On 20/07/2013 01:25, Fábio Rabelo wrote: Honestly i hope proxmox will drop openvz support in favour of LXC. This is a very good idea, by the way !!! I don't thinks so. Until some month ago LXC had insufficient privilege separation, and still is quite far from OpenVZ features. Simone --

Re: [PVE-User] bug in pve kernel

2013-07-22 Thread Diaolin
Il 2013-07-22 16:15 Simone Piccardi ha scritto: On 20/07/2013 01:25, Fábio Rabelo wrote: Honestly i hope proxmox will drop openvz support in favour of LXC. This is a very good idea, by the way !!! I don't thinks so. Until some month ago LXC had insufficient privilege separation, and still

Re: [PVE-User] bug in pve kernel

2013-07-19 Thread Patryk Benderz
[cut] Maybe it is time to change the kernel from extremely old REDHAT 2.6 to Wheezy 3.2, at least to the one that do not use OpenVZ, like myself ?!? I am looking forward to it. I am waiting for Debian kernel long enough. -- Patryk LeadMan Benderz Linux Registered User #377521 () ascii

Re: [PVE-User] bug in pve kernel

2013-07-19 Thread Fábio Rabelo
I´ve tryed 2.6.32-20, 2.6.32-21 and 2.6.32-22 all the same ... Fábio Rabelo 2013/7/19 Patryk Benderz patryk.bend...@esp.pl [cut] Maybe it is time to change the kernel from extremely old REDHAT 2.6 to Wheezy 3.2, at least to the one that do not use OpenVZ, like myself ?!? I am looking

Re: [PVE-User] bug in pve kernel

2013-07-19 Thread CoolCold
May be you are hitting the same issue - http://wiki.hetzner.de/index.php?title=Installation_des_r8168-Treibers/enredirect=no . This may be useful for you too - http://mytechspam.livejournal.com/15630.html . On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Fábio Rabelo fa...@fabiorabelo.wiki.br wrote: I´ve tryed

Re: [PVE-User] bug in pve kernel

2013-07-19 Thread Fábio Rabelo
Thanks for the tip, i will try in the next opportunity . For this system, I do not have time to wait, so I install Debian Squeeze, then the debian backports kernel ( 3.2.0-4-amd64 ) and then PVE 2.3 over it . I have this solution running in another system, extremely stable ( over 4 months up and

Re: [PVE-User] bug in pve kernel

2013-07-19 Thread Martin Maurer
But my real question remains, why keep using 2.6 redhat old and dirty kernel ?!?!? Our kernel is not old (and not dirty, whatever you mean with this), why do you think so? It’s based on the current RHEL64 kernel, most used kernel around the world. Martin

Re: [PVE-User] bug in pve kernel

2013-07-19 Thread Lex Rivera
RHEL kernel is not old. 2.6.32 RHEL != vanilla 2.6.32. Take a diff and compare it yourself, they backport shitload of features, patches, etc from newer kernels. RHEL kernel is more like separate fork from vanilla kernel. Nothing stops you from installing and running with wheezy kernel, but you

Re: [PVE-User] bug in pve kernel

2013-07-19 Thread Fábio Rabelo
Honestly i hope proxmox will drop openvz support in favour of LXC. This is a very good idea, by the way !!! Fábio Rabelo ___ pve-user mailing list pve-user@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Re: [PVE-User] bug in pve kernel

2013-07-19 Thread Dietmar Maurer
Honestly i hope proxmox will drop openvz support in favour of LXC. This is a very good idea, by the way !!! And you are 100% sure this is a good idea? You testest LXC? My feeling is that not everybody understand the whole issue. Besides, newer vzctl also run on vanilla kernel (with same

Re: [PVE-User] bug in pve kernel

2013-07-18 Thread Dietmar Maurer
What kernel do you use exactly? From: pve-user-boun...@pve.proxmox.com [mailto:pve-user-boun...@pve.proxmox.com] On Behalf Of Fábio Rabelo Sent: Donnerstag, 18. Juli 2013 21:09 To: pve-user@pve.proxmox.com Subject: [PVE-User] bug in pve kernel Just installed PVE3 on a gigabyte board