Re: [PVE-User] pve-zsync processes

On 3/21/18 1:51 PM, Wolfgang Link wrote: > >> So does this mean that all those processes are sitting in a "queue" waiting >> to execute? wouldn't it be more sensible for the script to terminate if a >> process is already running for the same job? >> > No because as I wrote 15 is default, but we

Re: [PVE-User] pve-zsync processes

> So does this mean that all those processes are sitting in a "queue" waiting > to execute? wouldn't it be more sensible for the script to terminate if a > process is already running for the same job? > No because as I wrote 15 is default, but we have many user which have longer intervals like

Re: [PVE-User] pve-zsync processes

Hi Wolfgang, So does this mean that all those processes are sitting in a "queue" waiting to execute? wouldn't it be more sensible for the script to terminate if a process is already running for the same job? Regards, Mark On 21 March 2018 at 12:40, Wolfgang Link wrote: >

Re: [PVE-User] pve-zsync processes

Hi, this indicates that the sync time is to low. cron fork every (default) 15 minutes a pve-zsync process. If the former pve-zsync process is not finished, it will wait until the former process is done. You should rise your sync interval this can be done in the /etc/cron.d/pve-zsync. Best

[PVE-User] pve-zsync processes

Hi All, I've been using pve-zsync for a few months - it seems to work pretty well. However, I have just noticed it doesn't seem to be terminating itself correctly. at present I have around 800 pve-zsync processes (sleeping) which all seems to be duplicates. (I would expect 1 per VMID?) Has