Re: [PVE-User] pve-firewall and NAT

2016-03-10 Thread Yannick Palanque
Hello, À 2016-03-10T11:15:09+0100, Jonas Borgström écrivit : > The only workaround I've found so far(from some proxmox forum) is: > $ iptables -t raw -A PREROUTING -i fwbr+ -j CT --zone 1 > > But that only works if I manually run it _after_ the firewall and the > container

Re: [PVE-User] V4.1: "Move Disk" function leads to file system corruption

2016-03-10 Thread Claudiu Popescu
> Hi Stefan > > SQL Server is known to be picky about the filesystem. > > Is the problem repeatable if you use the qemu-img command as it > displayed above ? > > If Yes can you try it again by using the switch -t writethrough instead > of writeback ? > This should be slower but safer. > > It

Re: [PVE-User] ceph.conf permissions

2016-03-10 Thread Albert Dengg
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:49:06AM +, James Bailey wrote: ... > > You could use extended ACLs to allow the ceph user read access to that file > only. > > https://wiki.debian.org/Permissions#Access_Control_Lists_in_Linux have you tried it in this case?b i'm not shure if the filesystem used

Re: [PVE-User] ceph.conf permissions

2016-03-10 Thread James Bailey
On 2016-03-10 10:30, Florent B wrote: On 03/10/2016 11:25 AM, Alessandro Briosi wrote: Il 10/03/2016 11:11, Florent B ha scritto: Hi everyone, I think there's a little problem with ceph.conf permissions on Proxmox. With Infernalis release, all ceph processes are running under "ceph" user.

Re: [PVE-User] ceph.conf permissions

2016-03-10 Thread Alessandro Briosi
Il 10/03/2016 11:11, Florent B ha scritto: > Hi everyone, > > I think there's a little problem with ceph.conf permissions on Proxmox. > > With Infernalis release, all ceph processes are running under "ceph" user. > > root user starts processes, then changes user to ceph. All is fine. > > But

[PVE-User] pve-firewall and NAT

2016-03-10 Thread Jonas Borgström
Hi, I'm trying to figure out if pve-firewall and NAT is a supported configuration or not. The pve-firewall wiki [1] page does not mention NAT. The NAT section of the Network model wiki page [2] does not mention anything about pve-firewall. I've been testing proxmox 4.1 with the following

Re: [PVE-User] V4.1: "Move Disk" function leads to file system corruption

2016-03-10 Thread Emmanuel Kasper
On 03/09/2016 07:14 PM, Stefan Plattner wrote: > Hello everyone! > > I used the "Move Disk" function in the "Hardware" tab of a > stopped/offline Windows-VM. After the process was finished, I re-started > the VM and the Guest greeted me with the following, in this cas > SQLServer related,