Hello,
À 2016-03-10T11:15:09+0100,
Jonas Borgström écrivit :
> The only workaround I've found so far(from some proxmox forum) is:
> $ iptables -t raw -A PREROUTING -i fwbr+ -j CT --zone 1
>
> But that only works if I manually run it _after_ the firewall and the
> container
> Hi Stefan
>
> SQL Server is known to be picky about the filesystem.
>
> Is the problem repeatable if you use the qemu-img command as it
> displayed above ?
>
> If Yes can you try it again by using the switch -t writethrough instead
> of writeback ?
> This should be slower but safer.
>
> It
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:49:06AM +, James Bailey wrote:
...
>
> You could use extended ACLs to allow the ceph user read access to that file
> only.
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/Permissions#Access_Control_Lists_in_Linux
have you tried it in this case?b
i'm not shure if the filesystem used
On 2016-03-10 10:30, Florent B wrote:
On 03/10/2016 11:25 AM, Alessandro Briosi wrote:
Il 10/03/2016 11:11, Florent B ha scritto:
Hi everyone,
I think there's a little problem with ceph.conf permissions on
Proxmox.
With Infernalis release, all ceph processes are running under
"ceph" user.
Il 10/03/2016 11:11, Florent B ha scritto:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I think there's a little problem with ceph.conf permissions on Proxmox.
>
> With Infernalis release, all ceph processes are running under "ceph" user.
>
> root user starts processes, then changes user to ceph. All is fine.
>
> But
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out if pve-firewall and NAT is a supported
configuration or not.
The pve-firewall wiki [1] page does not mention NAT.
The NAT section of the Network model wiki page [2] does not mention
anything about pve-firewall.
I've been testing proxmox 4.1 with the following
On 03/09/2016 07:14 PM, Stefan Plattner wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I used the "Move Disk" function in the "Hardware" tab of a
> stopped/offline Windows-VM. After the process was finished, I re-started
> the VM and the Guest greeted me with the following, in this cas
> SQLServer related,