Re: [PVE-User] Ceph - Better understanings

Its pretty straight forward. If you have 6TB and you are using size = 3 in ceph - you have 2TB (give or take) of usable storage. On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Daniel Eschner wrote: > Hi all, > > i am playing with Ceph and some thinks i dont understand. > The Proxmox

[PVE-User] Ceph - Better understanings

Hi all, i am playing with Ceph and some thinks i dont understand. The Proxmox docu tells how to setup easily - everthinks is working. But i want to understand how the Recplication and Redundancy works. I Setup 3 SSD OSDs ans created a Pool with Size 3 and Mn Size 2 Proxmox tells me the

Re: [PVE-User] HA Problem

seems to be :-( but should not be a big deal to copy all files ;) > Am 27.05.2016 um 13:34 schrieb David Lawley : > > seen that too, I would appear that it is not implemented yet in LXC? > > > > On 5/26/2016 5:39 PM, Daniel Eschner wrote: >> Mhh, >> >> it seems i dont

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4.2 and HA/Thin provision

LVM on it's own has nothing to do with HA. You are right, you can put LVM on top of DRBD, but this doesn't make it easier to create and maintain a cluster. You just use a different storage technique for your VMs. But as you sure may know, do not create a two node cluster, as you need three

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4.2 and HA/Thin provision

Actually, I need to know if with LVM-Thin is easier to make two node HA, or if this is not to do with HA at all If I am not wrong, I remember that with DRBD9 we can build a two node cluster HA Perhaps this is the case with LVM-Thin... 2016-05-27 11:40 GMT-03:00 Alwin Antreich

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4.2 and HA/Thin provision

Hi Gilberto, do you mean LVM-thin? But that has nothing to do with HA or do you think about something else? Cheers, Alwin On 05/27/2016 03:50 PM, Gilberto Nunes wrote: > Hello list > > Forgive me for this newbie question, but with PVE 4.2 was some aditional > features regard HA with two

[PVE-User] PVE 4.2 and HA/Thin provision

Hello list Forgive me for this newbie question, but with PVE 4.2 was some aditional features regard HA with two node??? It's something to do with Thin Provision??? Thanks for any enlitghment -- Gilberto Ferreira +55 (47) 9676-7530 Skype: gilberto.nunes36

Re: [PVE-User] Containers and DHCP

Hi Lindsay, in case you didn't think about this already. ;-) Are there any container config differences between the ubuntu and the debian containers? The default timeout and retry for dhclient is 60sec, how long do you wait til you connect to the prompt? How does your bridge setup (network

Re: [PVE-User] HA Problem

seen that too, I would appear that it is not implemented yet in LXC? On 5/26/2016 5:39 PM, Daniel Eschner wrote: Mhh, it seems i dont have that Option: https://www.dropbox.com/s/l1wml72jvd9k074/Screenshot%202016-05-26%2023.38.25.png?dl=0 Maybe it depends on LXC/KVM image? I just use lxc at

Re: [PVE-User] Containers and DHCP

On 27/05/2016 5:40 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: Have you tried changing the MAC? I've recreated the CT several times, I presume that would have done it. -- Lindsay Mathieson ___ pve-user mailing list pve-user@pve.proxmox.com

Re: [PVE-User] Containers and DHCP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Have you tried changing the MAC? On May 27, 2016 9:03:48 AM GMT+02:00, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: >On 27 May 2016 at 00:56, Alwin Antreich >wrote: >> may you please post your CT config, as I

Re: [PVE-User] Containers and DHCP

On 27 May 2016 at 00:56, Alwin Antreich wrote: > may you please post your CT config, as I use the debian8 proxmox templates > without these issues? arch: amd64 cpulimit: 1 cpuunits: 1024 hostname: ctest0 memory: 512 net0: