>>>
>>> Emmanuel
>>>
>> Hi Emmanuel,
>>
>> host102 is an old node, which is not displaying the last one host107 :
>>
>> root@host102:~# pvecm nodes
>>
>> Membership information
>> --
>> Nodeid Votes Name
>> 3 1 10.109.0.101
>> 2 1
On 12/29/2016 11:09 AM, Emmanuel Kasper wrote:
>>
>> On 12/29/2016 10:57 AM, Florent B wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Today I added a new node to my PVE cluster (every node up-to-date).
>>>
>>> When I connect to one of my 3 old nodes, the new node is not displayed
>>> (at all, not in the list)
Le 03/01/2017 à 13:59, Dominik Csapak a écrit :
> On 01/03/2017 11:33 AM, Dhaussy Alexandre wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I just spotted something strange with storage cache mode.
>>
>> I set cache=none on all my VMs (i believe this is the default), however
>> qm monitor says "writeback, direct".
>>
>>
On 01/03/2017 11:33 AM, Dhaussy Alexandre wrote:
Hello,
I just spotted something strange with storage cache mode.
I set cache=none on all my VMs (i believe this is the default), however
qm monitor says "writeback, direct".
Am i missing something ?
from the kvm manpage:
The host page cache
On 3/01/2017 6:38 PM, Kevin Lemonnier wrote:
I'll be very interested in what you think compared to gluster !
I've been looking at it too.
Interesting so far, performance a lot better than the last time I
looked, not on a par with gluster but getting there. Pretty stable to.
Different replica
Did some playing around with LizardFS and used keepalived to setup a HA
solution for it - floating IP plus promote/demote scripts. The IP was
bound to a linux bond on two ethernet cards per node (balance-alb). The
proxmox cluster uses a thrid card per node with is a simple bridge onn a
sperate
Hello,
I just spotted something strange with storage cache mode.
I set cache=none on all my VMs (i believe this is the default), however
qm monitor says "writeback, direct".
Am i missing something ?
root@proxmoxt20:~# qm monitor 198
Entering Qemu Monitor for VM 198 - type 'help' for help
qm>
> Am wanting to trial multiple sheepdog nodes with out proxmox cluster
> and they need to be part of it for that.
I'll be very interested in what you think compared to gluster !
I've been looking at it too.
--
Kevin Lemonnier
PGP Fingerprint : 89A5 2283 04A0 E6E9 0111
signature.asc