Re: [PVE-User] unable to add turnkey container as root

Hello, see https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/cannot-create-new-container-from-turnkey-image.52468/ br, Martin On 3/25/19 5:33 PM, Adam Weremczuk wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm using the latest available: > > pve-kernel-4.15  5.3-3 > pve-manager  5.3-11 > >

Re: [PVE-User] CEPH and huge pages

I back huge page from always to madvise and everything is ok... --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 3025-5907 (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Skype: gilberto.nunes36 Em ter, 26 de mar de 2019 às 16:07, Gilberto Nunes < gilberto.nune...@gmail.com> escreveu: > Hi there > > I have 3

[PVE-User] CEPH and huge pages

Hi there I have 3 Proxmox servers which is a ceph cluster as well. This morning I change the huge_pages from madvise to always and get a lot of trouble with pg inconsistence... Is there any knowing issue with huge pages and Ceph? All servers has more than 100 GB of memory. Proxmox 5-2.2. Use

Re: [PVE-User] [PATCH container 1/1] Signed-off-by: Hugo Lecourt

On 3/26/19 9:43 AM, Hugo Lecourt via pve-user wrote: I used git-send-mail However, i'm not accustom to post in mailing list, so i fail this post Will you, I re-post this in pve devel? I have believe i'm not able to post in this list sorry about the part about git-send-mail, our mailing list

Re: [PVE-User] [PATCH container 1/1] Signed-off-by: Hugo Lecourt

--- Begin Message --- I used git-send-mail However, i'm not accustom to post in mailing list, so i fail this post Will you, I re-post this in pve devel? I have believe i'm not able to post in this list Yes, the second fix is crappy I've been test again, and there is no bug... It's make no sense!

Re: [PVE-User] Boot disk corruption after Ceph OSD destroy with cleanup

On 3/22/19 3:17 PM, Eneko Lacunza wrote: > Hi Alwin, > > El 22/3/19 a las 15:04, Alwin Antreich escribió: >> On Fri,On a point release, a ISO is generated and the release info is needed >> On a point release, a ISO is generated and the release info is needed >> for that. >> >> The volume of

Re: [PVE-User] [PATCH container 1/1] Signed-off-by: Hugo Lecourt

hi, a few things to your patch: * please use the developer list instead of the user list * please send the patch directly as mail (e.g. with git-send-email) instead of as eml * use a meaningful subject this information is all available in our developer-documentation[0] to the patch itself:

Re: [PVE-User] why ;-]

On 3/26/19 8:09 AM, lord_Niedzwiedz wrote: > root@ave:~# apt upgrade > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Calculating upgrade... Done > The following packages have been kept back: >   zfs-initramfs zfsutils-linux > 0 upgraded, 0 newly

Re: [PVE-User] why ;-]

On Tue, 2019-03-26 at 08:09 +0100, lord_Niedzwiedz wrote: > root@ave:~# apt upgrade > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Calculating upgrade... Done > The following packages have been kept back: >zfs-initramfs zfsutils-linux > 0

[PVE-User] why ;-]

root@ave:~# apt upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following packages have been kept back:   zfs-initramfs zfsutils-linux 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded. Proxmox, why ?