> Sure enough, I can't find an LXC.pm
Seems your installation is broken. Try to fix that with
# apt-get update
# apt-get dist-upgrade
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
Any help guys ?
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan
wrote:
> i have recently installed debian 8.x LXC container on my 4.x Proxmox
> server. however i found a strange problem. my container can ping local net
> without any problem. like my container ip is
Mandi! Alwin Antreich
In chel di` si favelave...
> As it's a cluster after all, why not try to reboot the host and see if it
> goes away? Well, it's using the hammer instead
> of the screw driver, but it may fix it faster.
Hammer worked! Now the RBD storage are available. ;-)
Boh...
--
> https://www.pictshare.net/cb2c08d9ca.png
Seems you try to display lists of Nodes/Guests in:
Offline Nodes:
Guest with errors:
IMHO such lists can be quite long, so how do you plan to display
a long lists here?
___
pve-user mailing list
>
> do you mean the resources from each node?
>
No, I mean for the cluster. Would be great to have those values
(cpu, ram, maybe IO ..) for the whole cluster monitored, I think.
Monitoring each node individually is nice, but that doesn't tell
you that you are almost out of ram on the cluster
On 10/17/2016 04:52 PM, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
https://www.pictshare.net/cb2c08d9ca.png
Seems you try to display lists of Nodes/Guests in:
Offline Nodes:
Guest with errors:
IMHO such lists can be quite long, so how do you plan to display
a long lists here?
as it is now, it would simply
Hi all,
i am currently working on a cluster dashboard,
and wanted to get feedback from you all.
please be aware that this is a mockup only, no functionality yet,
so no patches for now
i will also post it on the forum (maybe tomorrow) to get
additional feedback
please discuss :)
ps: for
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:58:35 +0200
Dominik Csapak wrote:
> so cpu is the node average
Why average on not total? If this is supposed to be a cluster wide
dashboard average gives no mening.
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael rasmussen
On 10/17/2016 04:19 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:17:48 +0200
Michael Rasmussen wrote:
I would say 5 out of 6 cores is in use so 83,33 % CPU usage in the
cluster.
Forgot to mention: For people coming from VmWare this makes sense since
that is how
Hi,
I miss a Ceph Server status summary if it is being used, maybe at
Datacenter Health box - it should reflect ceph status (OK, WARN, etc.)
Cheers
Eneko
El 17/10/16 a las 15:58, Dominik Csapak escribió:
Hi all,
i am currently working on a cluster dashboard,
and wanted to get feedback from
>
> https://www.pictshare.net/cb2c08d9ca.png
>
Looks good, it would be great to be able to get each values separatly
for monitoring purposes. Right now we monitor each nodes independently,
I would be happy to add a "cluster check" on top of that though !
Would help knowing when it's time to
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:14:37 +0200
Dominik Csapak wrote:
> On 10/17/2016 04:04 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:58:35 +0200
> > Dominik Csapak wrote:
> >
> >> so cpu is the node average
> > Why average on not total? If this
On 10/17/2016 04:04 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:58:35 +0200
Dominik Csapak wrote:
so cpu is the node average
Why average on not total? If this is supposed to be a cluster wide
dashboard average gives no mening.
i agree, but with cpu usage it
i have recently installed debian 8.x LXC container on my 4.x Proxmox
server. however i found a strange problem. my container can ping local net
without any problem. like my container ip is 10.51.100.134 so i can
10.51.100.8 and other nodes successfully. however when i try to ping google
i can not
CTs are one of the best features of Proxmox for me. With such technology
it becomes a powerfull contestant.
I use now Proxmox 4.2.
First question:
I can't find an ideal storage for containers. A shared storage that
supports snapshot too (To migrate and to do live backups).
Second one:
On
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:17:48 +0200
Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> I would say 5 out of 6 cores is in use so 83,33 % CPU usage in the
> cluster.
>
Forgot to mention: For people coming from VmWare this makes sense since
that is how vSphere cluster client displays it.
--
Hello all,
Has anyone else also had trouble with this on the pve-no-subscription
repository? It's occurred on two machines I've tried on two separate
clusters.
Setting up pve-firewall (2.0-31) ...
Job for pve-firewall.service failed. See 'systemctl status
pve-firewall.service' and 'journalctl
17 matches
Mail list logo