: 3.5.2-2+deb8u2
lxc-pve: 1.1.5-7
lxcfs: 2.0.0-pve2
cgmanager: 0.39-pve1
criu: 1.6.0-1
Met vriendelijke groeten,
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
pve:/> get /cluster/resources -type=vm
?
Met vriendelijke groeten,
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
Van: IMMO WETZEL <immo.wet...@adtr
t; : "4.3"
}
Met vriendelijke groeten,
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
Van: Kevin Lemonnier <lemonni...@ulrar.net>
Aan: <pve
Nobody?
Met vriendelijke groeten,
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
Van: Mark Schouten <m...@tuxis.nl>
Aan: <pve-user@pve.pr
Hi,
> On 15 Mar 2017, at 00:22, Mark Schouten <m...@tuxis.nl> wrote:
> So, I finally stumbled upon
> https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/pve-firewall-drop-traffic.32290/
> <https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/pve-firewall-drop-traffic.32290/>, and
> tried to do a sy
On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 11:36 +1200, Andrew Thrift wrote:
> Why is the rate of multicast so high from Corosync ? e.g. is it by
> design ?
> Is there anyway to reduce this ?
I think it's rrd files being updated quit a lot?
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark
ch causes things
to skew more than 0.5 seconds. I've 'fixed' this by doing
minpoll 4 maxpoll 6
Which causes ntp to check more often (instead of every 1024 seconds).
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http:/
Hi,
> On 13 Mar 2017, at 18:43, lists wrote:
> We are seeing occasional slow requests on our three-node pve ceph 0.94.9
> cluster. I've seen it happening after ceph deep-scrubs start. Googling this,
> refers me to this page on lowering ceph scrub I/O priority:
>
>
decloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
o build stuff like vzdump -> S3. But good to
know you are interested, we can definitely work together on this!
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 2
is still active?
I've done this from NFS to Iscsi and from iscsi to Ceph. No issues
encountered. Was scary every time, but still not sure why because it
never failed me. :)
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://
Create a single disk setup. Later on, type zpool attach..
Met vriendelijke groeten,
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
Van: Nils Privat <gis
issues, because it feels the routed
traffic has state invalid.
Everything starts working as soon as I do a `iptables -D PVEFW-FORWARD 1`. Am
I misinterpreting stuff, doing something wrong, or is this something else?
Thanks,
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark
n the interface settings
of the VM?
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-u
l /etc/ceph/ceph.conf
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Apr 25 11:21 /etc/ceph/ceph.conf ->
/etc/pve/ceph.conf
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 031
se advise.
—
Mark Schouten
Tuxis Internet Engineering <m...@tuxis.nl <mailto:m...@tuxis.nl>>
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
ything.
Thanks for your support.
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
r status
> # pvecm status
> # cat /etc/pve/corosync.conf
Output in the attachment. Because the misbehaving node also is the
master, output of ha-manager is identical on all nodes.
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 615
Thomas, pretty please? :)
On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 09:45 +0200, Mark Schouten wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 09:05 +0200, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> > Can you control that the config looks the same on all nodes?
> > Especially the difference between working and misbehaving
You cannot just LACP over different switches. It should be a stack of switches.
Met vriendelijke groeten,
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
Van
.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
elijke groeten,
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
migration though. Not sure why, I don't mind
that very much while upgrading a full cluster.
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl__
If you want to wget, do wget -O /dev/null so you're not suffering from
diskperformance..
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl___
up-and-recovery-for-proxmox
I don't know it. But please share your experiences, as we might be
interested as well. :)
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T:
. Am I right?
Regards,
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
https
in which you
can 'mount' the vzdump-image and extract files from it, that would be a
nice feature.
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 2
On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 11:32 +0300, Dmitry Petuhov wrote:
> Also it may affect live-migration of running machines.
Affect as in 'break', or affect as in 'update the new situation'? :)
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
-198-disk-1
I'm pretty sure I can just delete the Unused disk at the VM level, and
that it won't delete the base-disk. But I'd rather be completely sure.
Can anyone confirm? :)
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076
://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
Hi,
I've reported Bug 1823 [1] last week. Is anyone else seeing this? If
so, maybe you can confirm the bug in bugzilla?
[1]: https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076
Hi,
On Wed, 2018-06-27 at 15:09 +0200, Mark Schouten wrote:
> I have a VM that remains in snap-delete state. I'm wondering what the
> safest way is to proceed. I think I can do a qm unlock, and click
> remove again, but I'm not sure. Please advise. See current qm config
> below:
be
happy with three.
Just my 2 cts.
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl___
pve-user mailing list
ource and target node around the time of the
> same failed migration
>
> did all VMs with disks mapped via KRBD fail to migrate, or just some?
Sent this info off-list.
I tried a few, that failed. And then stopped trying. So I'm not sure.
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.ke
Hi,
Is anyone actively using CephFS served by a Proxmox cluster. AFAICS there is
no technical problem to configure a Proxmox cluster to serve CephFS, but I'm
looking for pros and cons.
Thanks,
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet
but
complete crashes
are new. The cluster in this case was just upgraded to PVE 5.x
Does anybody have tips or tricks on how to improve stability during backups?
Please let me
know.
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK
Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
Van: Alexandre DERUMIER <aderum...@odiso.com>
Aan: proxmoxve <pve-user@pve.proxmox.com>
Verzonden: 2-1-2018 17:49
Onderwerp: R
bug?
Met vriendelijke groeten,
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
Van: dORSY <dors...@yahoo.com>
Aan: PVE User List <pve-user@pve.proxmox.com&
e used is relevant for migrating local
storage, but just the name of the storage.. You can create images on
ZFS, you don't need LVM to be able to create VM's with storage.
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http
bout why you would want to do that..
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve
ke I said, I think you should be able to rename 'local-zfs' in
'local-lvm' in /etc/pve/storage.cfg, and not worry about LVM anymore.
But maybe we're misunderstanding each other.
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK
ure about the commands, check before executing)
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve
from writing
your own qemu-guest-agent script to configure the IP address on the VM,
I think.
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i
dy installed om
them. So this would not be an issue for me, personally.
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 12:55 +0200, Ralf Storm wrote:
> manually remove the snapshot and the lock from the config - file and
> proceed
Yes. Also, check if Ceph has no snapshots left that you think you
deleted :)
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten |
* Done
Regards,
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
https
vzdump_$timstamp | rbd import
I think we are allow to do rbd export to STDOUT and into vma? Proxmox
developers?
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
Proxmox do the same?
[1]:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/6/html/virtualization_tuning_and_optimization_guide/chap-virtualization_tuning_optimization_guide-memory-backing
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis
I’ve been able to migrate VM’s between upgraded and ‘old’ nodes. Not all VM’s
survived it without crashing, but I’m not sure what caused it (might be Ceph
client stuff as well).
> On 4 Sep 2018, at 18:29, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
>
>
> I've upgraded some standalone PVE installation with
Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
ply to a 'regular' proxmox install? We are managing
> the
> cluster (and installed it) using the regular proxmox 4 installer.
> (this
> gave us hammer at the time, which we have upgraded to jewel)
A default Proxmox setup runs as admin, doesn't it? With all caps?
--
Kerio Operator in de C
On Mon, 2018-07-09 at 16:32 +0200, lists wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On 9-7-2018 15:57, Mark Schouten wrote:
> > A default Proxmox setup runs as admin, doesn't it? With all caps?
>
> I think the answer to #1 is yes, but I'm not sure how to tell about
> the
> second caps
not in sync with any other experience I
hear/read.
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl___
pve-user mailin
this is functional, it doesn't prevent anyone
from spoofing a neighbours address, so it's not completely functional.
Am I missing something?
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i
Hi,
Wouldn't it make sense to include Ceph services in the default
local_network firewalling rules?
Regards,
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i
th another round of nftables testing.
It's not really MAC filtering I'm looking for. But wouldn't this be
fixed if the connection inbound would be filtered as well as outbound?
So add the ipfilter-rules to $interface-IN as well?
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schout
On Fri, 2018-04-13 at 10:08 +0200, Mark Schouten wrote:
> It's not really MAC filtering I'm looking for. But wouldn't this be
> fixed if the connection inbound would be filtered as well as
> outbound?
> So add the ipfilter-rules to $interface-IN as well?
Like so:
diff --git a/src/PVE
guru, I have the feeling that increasing the ruleset is
more resourcehungry.
Either way, it would be great if this would be fixed!
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 031
whichever IP they want. The description of the ipfilter-
function makes you suspect that that is prevented.
(I don't mind testing/spending time on speeding this up)
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www
Hi,
> On 23 Mar 2018, at 18:11, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
>
> Thanks for your script, I was looking for something like that.
>
> I'll try it next week and try to debug.
I have it working now. I’ll post the working version tomorrow.
> I'm seeing 2 improvements:
>
> -
, Zabbix, Sensu) makes more
sense than emailing.
I'm using the scripts attached to monitor via Sensu.
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl__
.nl/index.php/s/JzH3cz2wGdY8QXs
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
https://
brary provided by Proxmox.
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
ould lower usage of proxmox2-3 by: 15% to reach 34%
V: 15 of 67524956160 = 10128743424 bytes
V: proxmox2-1 will receive the VM
V: Looking for migratable VMs on proxmox2-3
500 proxy not allowed
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engin
On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 16:01 +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> My config was ok and it's working like a charm after both servers
> have
> been rebooted.
> For some reason "systemctl restart networking" wasn't enough.
This is not working anymore, unfortunatly...
--
Mark Scho
n how to get that solved?
HA Detects outages between the Proxmox Nodes. Not if storage is
reachable.
--
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
___
pve-user mailing l
Hi,
We've noticed some performance wins on using writeback for Ceph RBD
devices, but I'm wondering how we should project risks on using
writeback. Writeback isn't very unsafe, but what are the risks in case
of powerloss of a host?
Thanks,
--
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK
afamiglia.it/index.php/it/sostienici/5x1000
(cf 00307430132, categoria ONLUS oppure RICERCA SANITARIA)
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
--
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet
e had invalid entries in that file once. Was because my /etc/hosts
file was broken. Restarting pve-cluster (with the correct hosts file)
helped.
--
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
___
eo.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Fast-Cheap-Good-Triangle.jpg
--
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
https://pve.proxmox.co
more efficient to do just place a 4Tb and a 8Tb disk in
each server?
Changing weight will not cause the available space counters to drop
accordingly, I think. So it's probably confusing..
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
ght potentially cause degraded performance.
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-u
t; time..? (and HOW?)
I think you can't prevent it. Removing an OSD changes the CRUSH-map,
and thus rebalances. However, there is no nood to wait for it to finish
rebalancing again.
You can add the new OSD directly after removing the old one.
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioind
Other than limited throughput, I can’t think of a problem. But limited
throughput might cause unforeseen situations.
Mark Schouten
> Op 22 nov. 2018 om 19:30 heeft Frank Thommen
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Please excuse, if this is too basic, but after reading
> https://
tach rpool /dev/sdb2 /dev/sda2
--
Mark Schouten
Tuxis, Ede, https://www.tuxis.nl
T: +31 318 200208
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
change in Proxmox settings to make this possible?
Thanks!
--
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi
a backup for 7 days. I queues all the VM's needing a backup and
create a lockfile on the cluster filesystem. So you can run pmrb on all
nodes concurrently, but only one backup will run at the time. It will
also stop starting backups after a set time, to prevent load issues
during the day.
--
Great! Thanks.
Mark Schouten
> Op 12 apr. 2019 om 17:49 heeft Thomas Lamprecht het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On 4/12/19 4:41 PM, Mark Schouten wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm in the process of upgrading some older 4.x clusters with Ceph to current
on https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Ceph_Jewel_to_Luminous
and/or https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_4.x_to_5.0 is possible?
--
Mark Schouten
Tuxis, Ede, https://www.tuxis.nl
T: +31 318 200208
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
Hi,
Is it possible to configure defaults for diskio limits somewhere? I
cannot find it in documentation, but the term 'Default' in the GUI
suggests a default can be set somewhere :)
--
Mark Schouten | Tuxis B.V.
KvK: 74698818 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: +31 318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
)
We must indeed make assumptions. Are there ways we can assume better? :)
> The list trims attachments, could you please send them directly to my
> address? I'd really like to see those.
Attached again, so you should receive it now.
--
Mark S
fingers, I would like to discuss how we can
improve these kind of faulty situations.
In the attachment, you can find a log with dpkg, pmxcfs, pve-ha-(lc)rm
from all nodes. So maybe someone can better asses what went wrong.
[1]: https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823
--
Mark Schouten
np!
--
Mark Schouten
Tuxis, Ede, https://www.tuxis.nl
T: +31 318 200208
- Originele bericht -
Van: Thomas Lamprecht (t.lampre...@proxmox.com)
Datum: 25-06-2019 10:31
Naar: PVE User List (pve-user@pve.proxmox.com), Mark Schouten (m...@tuxis.nl)
Onderwerp: Re: [PVE-User] pve
cceeded. How does it determine that?
--
Mark Schouten | Tuxis B.V.
KvK: 74698818 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: +31 318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 01:30:15PM +0200, Mark Schouten wrote:
> > From a quick look at the code: That seems true and is definitively the
> > wrong behavior :/
>
> Ok, I'll file a bug for that.
https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245
--
Mark Schouten | Tuxis
his customer. They'll be thrilled to know I'm going to work on it
;)
--
Mark Schouten | Tuxis B.V.
KvK: 74698818 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: +31 318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin
need to take a close look here to ensure this has no non-intended
> side effects.
Great, thanks.
--
Mark Schouten | Tuxis B.V.
KvK: 74698818 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: +31 318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmo
sider it to set this in pve-firewall, which seems a good default if
you ask me.
--
Mark Schouten | Tuxis B.V.
KvK: 74698818 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: +31 318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
https://pve.prox
https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2206
--
Mark Schouten
Tuxis, Ede, https://www.tuxis.nl
T: +31 318 200208
- Originele bericht -
Van: Mark Schouten (m...@tuxis.nl)
Datum: 09-05-2019 10:11
Naar: PVE User List (pve-user@pve.proxmox.com)
Onderwerp: Re: [PVE-User] Ceph
Hi,
I was playing around with pvesm export, but I cannot find it for Ceph backed
images. Is that unsupported? I'm thinking it might be more efficient than
vzdump ...
--
Mark Schouten
Tuxis, Ede, https://www.tuxis.nl
T: +31 318 200208
___
pve
:amd64 2.3.3-1+deb9u4 2.3.3-1+deb9u6
2019-05-08 02:10:20 upgrade publicsuffix:all 20181003.1334-0+deb9u1
20190415.1030-0+deb9u1
2019-05-08 02:10:20 upgrade ruby2.3:amd64 2.3.3-1+deb9u4 2.3.3-1+deb9u6
--
Mark Schouten
Tuxis, Ede, https://www.tuxis.nl
T: +31 318 200208
Hi,
`ceph features` will list all connected daemons and clients. Probably, there is
still a client connected that runs a Jewel version. Maybe a Kernel CephFS mount
somewhere that needs a reboot?
--
Mark Schouten
Tuxis, Ede, https://www.tuxis.nl
T: +31 318 200208
- Originele
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 03:02:36PM +0700, Igor Podlesny wrote:
> On Mon, 6 May 2019 at 14:33, Mark Schouten wrote:
> > `ceph features` will list all connected daemons and clients.
> > Probably, there is still a client connected that runs a Jewel version.
>
> Can't be anyth
I think udev is making them 'disappear'.
Do you have anything in /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persisent-net ? That sometimes
renames interfaces..
--
Mark Schouten
Tuxis, Ede, https://www.tuxis.nl
T: +31 318 200208
- Originele bericht -
Van: David Lawley (da...@upilab.com)
Datum: 09
Might also be the number of nfsd started on your Synology.
--
Mark Schouten
Tuxis, Ede, https://www.tuxis.nl
T: +31 318 200208
- Originele bericht -
Van: Gerald Brandt (g...@majentis.com)
Datum: 25-04-2019 14:51
Naar: pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
Onderwerp: Re: [PVE-User] NFS
. Is there a
way to enable 2FA, and disable the GUI for users without 2FA? Perhaps by
revoking a rolepermission?
--
Mark Schouten
Tuxis, Ede, https://www.tuxis.nl
T: +31 318 200208
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi
.
API-users and API-client-addresses would be the best fix, if you ask me. But
since the GUI just uses the API, I guess that is more difficult than you'd
expect. :/
--
Mark Schouten
Tuxis, Ede, https://www.tuxis.nl
T: +31 318 200208
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Lamprecht
https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187
Thanks.
--
Mark Schouten
Tuxis, Ede, https://www.tuxis.nl
T: +31 318 200208
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Lamprecht (t.lampre...@proxmox.com)
Date: 24-04-2019 13:38
To: Mark Schouten (m...@tuxis.nl), Dominik Csapak (d.csa
?
Because at HTTP-level, that would completely disable the GUI, which you
obviously don't want. Or do you mean in the permissions for the user?
Thanks,
--
Mark Schouten
Tuxis, Ede, https://www.tuxis.nl
T: +31 318 200208
- Originele bericht -
Van: Dominik Csapak (d.csa...@proxmox.com
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo