Re: [Pvfs2-developers] patches: karma

2006-05-23 Thread Robert Latham
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 05:10:34PM +0200, Phil Carns wrote: > perf-mon.patch: > > karma1.patch: > -- > karma2.patch: > -- > karma3.patch: > -- > karma4.patch: > -- > karma5.patch: > --- Looks good. Comitted all of them (e

Re: [Pvfs2-developers] patches: karma

2006-05-23 Thread Phil Carns
Robert Latham wrote: On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 05:10:34PM +0200, Phil Carns wrote: Index: pvfs2_src/src/server/perf-mon.sm === --- pvfs2_src/src/server/perf-mon.sm(revision 1541) +++ pvfs2_src/src/server/perf-mon.sm(revision

Re: [Pvfs2-developers] patches: karma

2006-05-22 Thread Robert Latham
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 05:10:34PM +0200, Phil Carns wrote: > Index: pvfs2_src/src/server/perf-mon.sm > === > --- pvfs2_src/src/server/perf-mon.sm (revision 1541) > +++ pvfs2_src/src/server/perf-mon.sm (revision 1542) > @@ -86,6 +86,

Re: [Pvfs2-developers] patches: karma

2006-05-22 Thread Robert Latham
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 05:10:34PM +0200, Phil Carns wrote: > perf-mon.patch: > > In > addition, the metdata counts were supposed to be cumulative, but they > had been set to restart at zero on each interval. Sorry, never mind that last question. Your approach makes sense to me

Re: [Pvfs2-developers] patches: karma

2006-05-22 Thread Robert Latham
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 05:10:34PM +0200, Phil Carns wrote: > perf-mon.patch: > > In addition, the metdata counts were supposed to be cumulative, but > they had been set to restart at zero on each interval. Hi phil are you sure the metadata was supposed to be cumulative? I guess

[Pvfs2-developers] patches: karma

2006-05-18 Thread Phil Carns
Whoops- that was a little big for the mailing list. This one has gzip'd patches. Original Message Subject: patches: karma Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 17:10:34 +0200 From: Phil Carns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: PVFS2-developers perf-mon.patch: This fixes two bugs in t