Michael Rohaly wrote:
Just casting my vote. I've been using Swiki for work for a few years and
it's been terrific, so I want to see more development (specifically some
sort of GUI).
How about SqueakSource (http://www.squeaksource.com) instead? It
supports Squeak Smalltalk development
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/03/2008 09:42:45 AM:
How about SqueakSource (http://www.squeaksource.com) instead? It
supports Squeak Smalltalk development better than SourceForge would,
IMHO.
Can't hurt to do both.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/squeak/
anyone aware of squeak-based projects hosted on sourceforge?
i know the vm and plugins have a presence there, but as david points
out, it may not be suited to squeak development processes, but that
may just be my ignorance.
actually, the swiki development process may not be all that well
